• Text Resize A A A
  • Print Print
  • Share Share on facebook Share on twitter Share

Enforcement Highlights

For information on the history of and details about each of the HIPAA Rules, please visit https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/index.html and click on “Privacy,” “Security,” or “Breach Notification” from the left-hand tool-bar.

Enforcement Results as of March 31, 2018

Since the compliance date of the Privacy Rule in April 2003, OCR has received over 177,854 HIPAA complaints and has initiated over 884 compliance reviews. We have resolved ninety-six percent of these cases (171,470).

OCR has investigated and resolved over 25,797 cases by requiring changes in privacy practices and corrective actions by, or providing technical assistance to, HIPAA covered entities and their business associates. Corrective actions obtained by OCR from these entities have resulted in change that is systemic and that affects all the individuals they serve. OCR has successfully enforced the HIPAA Rules by applying corrective measures in all cases where an investigation indicates noncompliance by the covered entity or their business associate. To date, OCR has settled or imposed a civil money penalty in 55 cases resulting in a total dollar amount of $78,829,182.00. OCR has investigated complaints against many different types of entities including: national pharmacy chains, major medical centers, group health plans, hospital chains, and small provider offices.

In another 11,435 cases, our investigations found no violation had occurred. 

Additionally, in 26,635 cases, OCR has intervened early and provided technical assistance to HIPAA covered entities, their business associates, and individuals exercising their rights under the Privacy Rule, without the need for an investigation.

In the rest of our completed cases, (107,604) OCR determined that the complaint did not present an eligible case for enforcement. These include cases in which:

  • OCR lacks jurisdiction under HIPAA.  For example, in cases alleging a violation by an entity not covered by HIPAA;
  • The complaint is untimely, or withdrawn by the filer.  The activity described does not violate the HIPAA Rules;
  • The activity described does not violate the HIPAA Rules.  For example, in cases where the covered entity has disclosed protected health information in circumstances in which the Privacy Rule permits such a disclosure.  

From the compliance date to the present, the compliance issues investigated most are, compiled cumulatively, in order of frequency:

  • Impermissible uses and disclosures of protected health information;
  • Lack of safeguards of protected health information;
  • Lack of patient access to their protected health information;
  • Lack of administrative safeguards of electronic protected health information.
  • Use or disclosure of more than the minimum necessary protected health information; and

The most common types of covered entities that have been required to take corrective action to achieve voluntary compliance are, in order of frequency:

  • General Hospitals;
  • Private Practices and Physicians;
  • Outpatient Facilities;
  • Pharmacies; and
  • Health Plans (group health plans and health insurance issuers).

Referrals

OCR refers to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal investigation appropriate cases involving the knowing disclosure or obtaining of protected health information in violation of the Rules.  As of the date of this summary, OCR made 677 such referrals to DOJ.

Watch for monthly updates reporting the number of cases received, investigated or resolved.

Content created by Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
Content last reviewed on May 3, 2018