Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • About HHS
  • Programs & Services
  • Grants & Contracts
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Radical Transparency
  • Big Wins
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. About
  3. Agencies
  4. DAB
  5. Decisions
  6. ALJ Decisions
  7. 2020
  8. In re LCD Complaint: Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine (L35083), DAB CR5506 (2020)
  • Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
  • About DAB
    • Organizational Overview
    • Who are the Judges?
    • DAB Divisions
    • Contact DAB
  • Filing an Appeal Online
    • DAB E-File
    • Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
  • Different Appeals at DAB
    • Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
      • Forms
      • Procedures
    • Appeals to Board
      • Practice Manual
      • Guidelines
      • Regulations
      • National Coverage Determination Complaints
    • Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
      • Forms
      • Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
    • Sharing Neutrals
    • ADR Training
    • Other ADR Services
  • DAB Decisions
    • Board Decisions
    • DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    • Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
  • Stakeholder Feedback
  • Careers
    • Open Career Opportunities
    • Internships & Externships

In re LCD Complaint: Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine (L35083), DAB CR5506 (2020)


Department of Health and Human Services
DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Civil Remedies Division

In re LCD Complaint:
Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine (L35083)

Docket No. C-20-68
Decision No. CR5506
January 8, 2020

DECISION DISMISSING UNACCEPTABLE COMPLAINT

Clinton E. LeForce (the Aggrieved Party), submitted correspondence dated October 17, 2019, which the Civil Remedies Division treated as a challenge to a local coverage determination (LCD); docketed as styled above, C-20-68; and assigned to me for review.

The regulations at 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(b) require that I determine whether an aggrieved party has filed an "acceptable" and "valid" complaint. After reviewing the Aggrieved Party's filing, I concluded that it was not an acceptable and valid LCD complaint under the applicable regulations. Therefore, in an Acknowledgment of Receipt and Order to Aggrieved Party to Amend Unacceptable Complaint, dated November 7, 2019, I informed the Aggrieved Party that he had one opportunity to submit an acceptable complaint. See 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(1).

My November 7 Order listed the information that was required to be included in the Aggrieved Party's LCD complaint to make it acceptable. I specifically directed the Aggrieved Party to provide all of the following information:

  • LCD-identifying information. The specific provision (or provisions) of the LCD adversely affecting [the Aggrieved Party].
  • Aggrieved party statement.  A statement explaining why [the Aggrieved Party] think[s] that the provision(s) of the LCD is (are) not valid under the reasonableness standard.

Page 2

  • Clinical or scientific evidence. Copies of clinical or scientific evidence that support [the Aggrieved Party's] complaint and an explanation for why [the Aggrieved Party] think[s] that this evidence shows that the LCD is not reasonable.

My November 7 Order directed the Aggrieved Party to file the amended complaint by December 9, 2019. I advised the Aggrieved Party that if he did not submit an acceptable amended complaint, then I must issue a decision dismissing the unacceptable complaint. 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(2).

The Aggrieved Party failed to respond to my November 7 Order. Therefore, for the reasons explained in that Order, the October 17, 2019 complaint submitted by the Aggrieved Party remains unacceptable under 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(b). I am required to dismiss the unacceptable complaint. 42 C.F.R. § 426.410(c)(2). Accordingly, I order that the complaint be dismissed.

/s/

Steven T. Kessel Administrative Law Judge

Back to top

Subscribe to Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary and Press Releases.

Subscribe
  • Contact HHS
  • Careers
  • HHS FAQs
  • Nondiscrimination Notice
  • Press Room
  • HHS Archive
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Budget/Performance
  • Inspector General
  • Web Site Disclaimers
  • EEO/No Fear Act
  • FOIA
  • The White House
  • USA.gov
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
HHS Logo

HHS Headquarters

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​

Follow HHS

Follow Secretary Kennedy