Ignite Accelerator FAQs
The standard way that government operates: People think they have a good idea and then they go get a multi-million dollar contract to implement that idea. This is certainly an over-simplification, but it’s meant to prove a point: We think that ideas should be tested and validated. We believe that implementation of an idea is just as important — if not more important — than the idea itself.
So Ignite is about testing the idea and also testing the implementation of an idea. Selected teams go through phases of prototyping and may build towards what is called a Minimally Viable Product (MVP).
Here are some types of projects that could be supported by Ignite include:
- Simplifying an existing processes
- Modernizing a product or service being delivered
- Testing out new tools and technologies
- Improving internal policies and procedures
- Making something
- Experimenting with a new management style or organizational structure
- Trying something completely new
We’ve had a number of people mention that they think Ignite is about technology. It’s not! In fact, we believe that most problems are not technology oriented and thus most Ignite projects are not technology oriented. Tech becomes a red herring where really the processes and larger systems are the issue. Technology can be useful for sure, but it’s rarely the “solution”. With that said, parts of the government are behind in adopting modern technologies. So, as the third bullet above would suggest, projects that want to test the use of certainly technologies are certainly encouraged.
Yes, a project could already be underway or ongoing.
Sure! Though of course, an employee can’t be — or at least is highly unlikely to be allowed to be — the Project Lead on more than one selected project.
We only require the approval of the supervisor of the Project Lead.
All Staff/OpDiv heads are notified if — and only if — a proposal involving their staff are being strongly considered for the Ignite Accelerator. This is the last step in our selection process. This gives the leadership an opportunity to ask questions, seek clarifications, and provide any additional information they think we might need in order to make the best selection of teams.
Some ideas submitted are fairly disruptive in nature. And by definition, disruptive innovations go against the status quo, they run against existing processes behind which are staff and contractors that get paid to do their jobs.
But this is exactly why the IDEA Lab exists: To provide a safe place for experimentation outside of the normal operating environment. The American tax-payers are looking for a more modern and effective government so we encourage disruptive ideas. If it’s a good idea, and during Ignite you demonstrate viability of that idea, then it will sell itself.
During Ignite, we work with all the teams to help them run a meaningful test of their idea. This is to flesh out the idea itself and to help build evidence supporting it.
At the end of Ignite, we play the role of convener and help teams — at least the ones that are ready — to get in front of the right people to present their project idea. We’ll put the team there, but it’s up to the team to make the sell.
In aggregate, about a third of all teams have received the funding they wanted to take their effort to the next level; about a third received the ok from their leadership to continue working on their idea though without funds; and about a third ended up not really moving forward.