HHS Regulations Toolkit
HHS Regulations Toolkit (PDF - 187 KB)
Federal regulation is one of the basic tools the government uses to carry out public policy. Agencies issue regulations (also known as "rules") through the rulemaking process when Congress provides the authority to do so.
INTRODUCTION TO THE RULEMAKING PROCESS
The public plays an extremely important role by commenting on proposed rules and other documents that solicit public input, such as requests for information that sometimes lead to formal rulemaking. These comments can help shape the Department’s decisions.
What is a rule?
Rules are government statements that either:
- Carry out or explain law or policy, or
- Describe an agency's organization or procedures.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issues and enforces rules on a broad range of topics. For example, HHS rules help ensure that:
- The foods we consume are safe.
- Private health information remains confidential.
- Day care centers, hospitals, and other institutions we trust to care for our loved ones operate at high standards.
How does an agency identify the need for a rule?
There are many reasons why an agency decides to begin the rulemaking process. These include:
- Legal (or Statutory) mandate. Congress may specifically require a rule or at least the initiation of the rulemaking process, sometimes with a deadline.
- Agency identification of a problem or potential reform. An agency may decide to either propose a new regulation or modify an existing regulation through a process called “retrospective review.” It does this for a variety of reasons, including:
- Exploring agency reforms that could produce savings or reduce burdens on the public.
- Getting requests for interpretations or exemptions.
- Identifying changes in technology that can improve the agency’s practices.
- Identifying a problem because of an Inspector General report or other agency oversight.
- Having difficulty enforcing existing rules.
- Petition for rulemaking. HHS agencies often hear directly from regulated groups and other stakeholders regarding rules that they would like the Department to change. The public may ask or petition an agency to issue, modify, or withdraw a rule. The Department reviews these petitions to decide whether to take action.
- Advisory Committee, Government Accountability Office, or similar recommendations. Suggestions for rules may come from federal advisory committees, the HHS Office of the Inspector General, the Government Accountability Office, special commissions, or other bodies asked by Congress or the President to make recommendations on particular issues.
How does an agency initially determine the best solution to a problem?
An agency looks at different options or alternatives to address a problem before deciding to start the rulemaking process.
Before deciding to start the rulemaking process, an agency looks at different options or alternatives to address a problem. The Department explores whether it could fix the problem without issuing a rule. For example, could consumer reactions to a problem result in an industry making changes without a regulation? HHS also considers whether there are easier options, such as requiring the disclosure of information or labeling a product, which would achieve the goal.
Agencies use economic analysis to help determine the best option and whether the benefits are greater than its costs.
How do public comments influence the development of a rule?
Public comments play an important role in shaping and revising regulations. Here are a few examples:
- Based on feedback that some of the words used in the Designation Renewal of Head Start Grantees Proposed Rule could be confusing, the Administration for Children and Families’ 2011 Head Start Final Rule clarified and defined several terms. These changes help ensure that Head Start leaders across the country have clear expectations when competing for Head Start grants.
- In the 2012 Hospital Conditions of Participation Final Rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) made over a dozen significant changes based on public comments. For example, CMS revised the proposed definition of “medical staff” to allow hospitals to include non-physician practitioners who would be eligible to receive hospital privileges under state law. CMS focused on reducing burden and costs for Medicare providers to promote more attention and time toward providing quality health care and efficient operations. The final rule saves nearly $5 billion over 5 years for Medicare providers.
For more information about how comments make a difference, check out the handout “Public Comments Make a Difference” on Regulations.gov
How to comment on regulations
You can help shape regulations by commenting on the Department’s proposed rules published in the Federal Register. You can submit comments:
- Online at http://www.Regulations.gov
- By mail, or
- In person at certain locations
The rule published in the Federal Register will provide details on where to send comments.
The most convenient way to submit comments for many people is through Regulations.gov. You can learn more about how to find a regulation open for public comment here. Additional information is also available in the Frequently Asked Questions on Regulations.gov.
Tips for submitting effective public comments
The most helpful comments clearly communicate and support your position, whether you are for or against the proposed action. Here are some tips:
1. Plan Ahead. The comment period closes at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the date comments are due. Planning ahead helps to ensure that you submit your comments well before the deadline.
2. Contact the Agency. If you have questions or do not understand a part of the regulatory document, reach out to the agency contact person listed on the document before submitting your comment.
3. Identify the Issues. In your comment, clearly identify which issues you are commenting on within the regulatory action. Provide the page number, column, and/or paragraph from the Federal Register if you are commenting on a particular word, phrase, or sentence.
4. Selection is Fine. You do not have to comment on every issue in a rule. You may select the issues on which you wish to comment.
5. Address Specific Agency Requests. The Department often requests comments on specific parts of proposed rules. This may be a helpful place to focus your comments.
6. Details, Details. Constructive, detailed comments (whether positive or negative) are most helpful. If you agree with a proposed action, your comments are helpful to show that the public wants or needs the proposed action. If you disagree with a proposed action, suggest an alternative (including not regulating at all) and include an explanation of how the alternative might meet the same objective or be more effective. Evidence-based information is particularly helpful.
For more information about commenting effectively, check out the full list of Tips for Submitting Effective Comments on Regulations.gov.
MORE RESOURCES ABOUT THE RULEMAKING PROCESS
Instructional Videos from Regulations.gov
What Are Regulations? How to Comment on a Regulation:
What Are Regulations?
How to Comment on a Regulation
Additional Web-Based Resources
Social Media, Websites:
- Follow Regulations.gov on Twitter @RegulationsGov
- Visit the Regulations.gov YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/regulationsgov
- Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
- Unified Agenda
- Regulation Map: Graphic Depiction of Regulation Development Process
- Federal Register
Glossary of Rulemaking Terms:
Administrative Procedure Act — The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) outlines the basic requirements that federal agencies must follow when creating rules. Its basic purposes are (1) to help inform the public about agencies’ organization, procedure, and rules; (2) to provide the public with a chance to participate in the rulemaking process; (3) to establish uniform standards for rulemaking across various agencies; and (4) to outline the process for courts to review regulations.
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) — An ANPRM generally describes the regulatory action an agency is considering, explains the underlying issues, and asks for public input on specific questions. Agencies frequently use an ANPRM when it is desirable or advisable to obtain a broad spectrum of public comments early in a regulatory action. Use of an ANPRM is optional.
Comment Period — A comment period is the range of time the public has to submit input before an agency makes a final decision on a proposed rule. Federal agencies typically invite public comments on RFIs, ANPRMs, NPRMs, Direct Final Rules, and Interim Final Rules. In most cases, the comment period is 60 days.
Direct Final Rule — A Direct Final Rule is used occasionally when an agency believes that a rule is not controversial and is unlikely to receive negative comments. An agency publishes an NPRM and a Direct Final Rule in theFederal Register at the same time,with a statement that the rule will be effective as a final rule as of a particular date unless the agency receives a negative comment. If someone files a negative comment, the agency withdraws the final rule and continues under normal notice and comment procedures.
Federal Register — The Federal Register, sometimes described as the “legal newspaper” for the federal government, is the official publication for the U.S. government. An agency must publish any major change in its policies that will affect citizens in the Federal Register, unless the effect is limited to a small number of people. (In that case, those individuals must receive person notification.) The Federal Register publishes daily Monday – Friday, except on holidays.
Final Rule — A Final Rule is a regulation that has completed the notice and public comment process and has been approved for publication by policy officials. The Federal Register publishes final rules in official form, and they generally have a preamble that explains the basis for the rule, responds to comments received, and contains a variety of analyses of the rule’s potential impacts. Economically significant final rules (that is, they are estimated to have an impact of $100 million or more) generally take effect 60 days after publication, after which they have the force of law. Final rules with an impact of less than $100 million are generally effective 30 days after publication and have the force of law.
Interim Final Rule — An Interim Final Rule is a rule that an agency adopts without prior public input that is effective immediately but then invites comment after publication. An agency uses this type of rule when it has a good reason for not following the usual rulemaking process, such as in a time-sensitive situation.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) — An NPRM tells the public that the agency is proposing a new rule or a revision to an existing rule and provides the public with a timeframe to comment. The NPRM includes a “preamble,” which explains the need and authority for the proposed rule and the issues involved.
Request for Information (RFI) — Agencies generally use RFIs when they want public input on how to implement laws passed by congress, whether the agency should issue a new rule, or if there is a need to change an existing rule or policy. Comments also help agencies decide what action to take if it moves forward.
Content last reviewed on July 1, 2014