Raising Immunizations Safely and EffectivelyHealth Care Worker Campaign
RISE-HCWDavid A. Nace, MD, MPH Director, Long Term Care and Flu Programs University of Pittsburgh Institute on Aging July 18, 2008 naceda@upmc.edu ObjectivesReview the background work that led to RISE-HCW Describe the RISE-HCW program Present the RISE-HCW outcomes
Questions from the 1990’s1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater? 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time? 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
BHWP Pilot Community Based Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility1996 – Identified influenza immunization as QI Indicator 1996-98 – flu outbreaks 2002-03 – implemented declination form 2002-03 – Act 95 implemented 2004-05 – national shortage

Organizational Barriers- inadequate vaccine supplies
- general vaccine inaccessibility
- lack of positive incentives for immunization
- requirement of written consent
- limited record keeping
- lack of any feedback or shared learning
Individual Barrierslimited leadership knowledge and support poor staff knowledge about influenza negative staff attitudes about the vaccine and injections
BHWP HCW RatesNace DA, Hoffman EL, Resnick NM, Handler SM. Achieving and Sustaining High Rates of Influenza Immunization Among Long-Term Care Staff. J Am Med Dir Assoc February 2007; 8(2):128-133. 
Questions from the 1990’s- 1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater?
- 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time?
- 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
PLTCVP Promoting LTC Vaccinations Project- AMDA Foundation / Pfizer 2002 QI Award
- 2002-2003 Season
- 6 LTC Facilities in Western PA
- Goals
- Improve resident immunization rates
- Improve HCW immunization rates
PLTCVP Promoting LTC Vaccinations Project- Design
- 3 usual care and 3 collaborative groups
- All facilities
- received the ADMA Immunization Toolkit
- Access to project team for questions/information
- Collaborative group (3)
- Single collaborative training session October 2002
- Email / Phone contacts every 1-2 months Oct – February
PLTCVP Promoting LTC Vaccinations ProjectFacility | Δ HCW Flu % | Δ Resident Flu % | Δ Resident Pneumococcal % |
|---|
UC1 | -10.6 | 12.6 | -33.8 | UC2 | -16.7 | -64.7 | -2.0 | UC3 | 16.9 | -10.3 | -6.0 | C1 | 10.3 | 26.8 | 38.7 | C2 | 21.9 | 5.1 | 20.3 | C3 | 0.4 | -19.9 | 30.6 |
PLTCVP Promoting LTC Vaccinations ProjectFacility | 2002 HCW Flu Rate % | 2003 HCW Flu Rate % | Δ HCW Flu % |
|---|
Non Collaborative 1 | 23.1 | 12.5 | -10.6 | Non Collaborative 2 | 47.1 | 30.3 | -16.7 | Non Collaborative 3 | 17.8 | 34.7 | 16.9 | Collaborative 1 | 56.9 | 67.2 | 10.3 | Collaborative 2 | 14.3 | 36.2 | 21.9 | Collaborative 3 | 46.4 | 46.8 | 0.4 |
Focus Group Evaluation- Usual barriers identified
- Staff turnover problem
- Nursing & CNA turnover of 30-55% average annually
- Nick Castle
- 1996-2004 OSCAR data
- 43% ADM, 39% DON
- Facility UC2 champion team – 200% during study

RISE Program
Raising Immunizations Safely & Effectively

RISE-HCW Raising Immunizations Safely & Effectively-Healthcare Workers- Created 2004-2005 season
- Collaborative effort
- Rx Partners, LTC – a LTC pharmacy
- University of Pittsburgh Institute on Aging
- 9 Western PA LTC facilities
- Pharmacy based program
RISE-HCW Organizational Structure
Facility | Beds *skilled only when multi-level | No Staff (2007) | Urban/Rural | County | Union |
|---|
A | 139* | 356 | Urban | Allegheny | No | B | 59* | 158 | Urban | Allegheny | Yes | C | 100 | 107 | Rural | Venango | No | D | 150 | 199 | Urban | Butler | No | E | 59 | 96 | Rural | Mercer | No | F | 145 | 176 | Urban | Allegheny | No | G | 180 | 243 | Urban | Allegheny | No | H | 60* | 294 | Urban | Butler | Yes | I | 214 | 180 | Rural | Venango | No |
RISE-HCW ObjectivesPrimary - 60% HCW Influenza Immunization Rate
Secondary - 80% HCW Influenza Immunization Rate
Steering Committee Tasks- Spring
- Season activity
- Vaccination rates
- Vaccine supplies & orders
- Summer
- Vaccination rates
- Barrier assessment
- Educational planning
- Communications
- Fall
- 2 meetings
- Early implementation barriers
- Mid-season push
Facility Responsibilities- Leadership Contact Team
- Communication of information
- Accountability
- Leadership buy-in
- Sense of urgency
- Designate Flu Champion
- Coordinate immunizations
- Coordinate education
- Data collection
- Dissemination of outcomes
Pharmacy Responsibilities- Vaccine Supplies
- Defines Immunizations Process
- Policy and Procedures
- Forms
- Data collection
- Vaccination Clinic
- Initial start date at each facility
- Facility is responsible for administration
- Liaison between Steering Committee & Facilities
RISE-HCW Tools Used- Declination Form
- Incentives
- Pizza party for winning facility
- News coverage of positive outcomes
- Education
- Training and reference materials
- Formal training sessions
- AMDA video
- RISE Prevention & Management Network

RISE – Program Influenza Prevention & Management Network18 campuses in Western PA - Distribution list-serve
- Guidance
- Immunization issues
- Surveillance
- Outbreak detection
- Outbreak management
- Policy development
- Regulatory assistance
Questions from the 1990’s- 1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater?
- 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time?
- 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
Models of Mandatory Program Systems
Models of Voluntary Program Systems NRT - Non-respondent tracking
Facility | Rate | Declination | NRT |
|---|
Caring Place | 90% | Yes | Complete | Grove Manor | 88% | Yes | Complete | Cranberry Place | 86% | Yes | Complete | Sugar Creek Station | 83% | Yes | Complete | Asbury Heights | 75% | Yes | Partial | Seneca Place | 70% | Yes | Complete | Sherwood Oaks | 66% | Yes | Partial | Heritage Place | 61% | No | Partial | Canterbury Place | 32% | No | None |
NRT - Non-respondent tracking
Recommendations- Pharmacy Based Program
- Mandatory – Action Based Program
- Explicit declination forms
- Complete non-respondent tracking
- Leadership Accountability
- Require evidence based action if no improvement
- Don’t stipulate specific rate
- Use Care Bundles
2008-2009 Pittsburgh HCW Immunization Plans- UPMC Health System
- President’s Dashboard item
- HCW Immunization Rate
- Declination Return Rate
- UPMC Health Plan
- Use of MyHealth Internet Survey
- Allegheny County Health Department
- Healthcare Facility Reporting of HCW Rates
2007-08 UPMC Flu Vaccination RatesFacility | Immunization Rate Estimates |
|---|
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside ( & WPIC) | 33% | UPMC South Side | 37% | UPMC McKeesport | 44% | UPMC Children’s | 44% | UPMC Magee | 40% | UPMC St. Margaret’s | 48% | UPMC Northwest | 67% | UPMC Horizon | 50% | UPMC Passavant | 42% | UPMC Braddock | 56% | UPMC Bedford | 52% | UPMC Mercy | 44% | Physician Services Division | 30% |
Team Members- RISE Steering Committee
- Sandra Carroll
- Daniel Grant
- Jay Harper
- Steven Handler
- Shikha Iyengar
- Mary Ann Suda
- Mark Tannis
- Barry Young
- Paula Carlock
- Scott Stephens
| - Facilities and their teams
- Asbury Heights
- Canterbury Place
- Caring Place
- Cranberry Place
- Grove Manor
- Heritage Place
- Seneca Place
- Sherwood Oaks
- Sugar Creek Station
|
|