|
|
|
|
|
Why
- Concepts |
|
When -
Applicability |
|
What
- Process |
|
How
- Resources |
|
Who
- Human Assistance |
|
Wow
- Things That Can Go Wrong |
|
|
|
|
Volunteers - Human Subjects |
|
Permission - Informed Consent |
|
Oversight - Institutional Review Boards |
|
Documentation - Assurance and Records |
|
Self-Interest - What’s it to you? |
|
|
|
|
Other people and their private information don’t
belong to the PI |
|
The sheer value of the research does not
automatically trump rights of people |
|
Ask before you take unless IRB approves |
|
Definition of a human subject |
|
|
|
|
Human subject means a living individual about
whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research
obtains: |
|
data
through intervention or interaction with the individual, or |
|
identifiable
private information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Nuremberg Code on, the right to say
“no” is the first right of a subject |
|
Permission of a duly informed volunteer is
required unless the IRB says otherwise |
|
Volunteers who are not of legal age for the
intended procedure must also grant permission (if they’re able to do so) |
|
Definitions of consent and assent |
|
|
|
|
Consent - legally effective agreement of the subject
or the subject's legally authorized representative based on information
that is given to the subject or the representative in language that is understandable |
|
Assent - child’s affirmative agreement to
participate in research |
|
Permission - agreement of parent(s) or guardian
to the participation of their child or ward in research |
|
|
|
|
An objective review panel under 45 CFR 46 |
|
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.102) |
|
Competent for review of science & ethics |
|
Adequate in number and composition |
|
Voting members are free of conflict |
|
Suitably composed for involved human subjects |
|
Sufficient knowledge of local context |
|
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/local.htm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior written promise to meet minimum Federal
standards to protect subjects |
|
IRB minutes in required detail |
|
Ongoing IRB certification and enduring records
of all required reportable events |
|
If it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen |
|
Definitions of Assurance and Records |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assurance - a legally binding written document
that commits a public or private entity to compliance with applicable Federal
minimum standards for the protection of human subjects prior to engagement
in Department or Agency conducted or supported research (i.e., prior
binding promise to follow applicable rules) and includes citation of ethical
principles, designated IRB, list of IRB members, IRB procedures, and
institutional and investigator responsibilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Records - An institution, or when appropriate an
IRB, shall prepare and maintain: |
|
|
|
Copies of all research proposals reviewed, any scientific
evaluations, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted
by investigators, and reports of injuries to subjects |
|
Minutes of IRB meetings which shall be in
sufficient detail to show attendance; actions taken; the vote on these
actions; the basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; and a
written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their
resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
Records - An institution, or when appropriate an
IRB, shall prepare and maintain: |
|
|
|
Records of continuing review activities |
|
Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and
the investigators |
|
A list of IRB members in the same detail as
described in §46.103(b)(3) |
|
Written procedures for the IRB in the same
detail as described in §46.103(b)(4) and §46.103(b)(5). |
|
|
|
|
Defensible research must be ethical research |
|
Rules that protect subjects protect the PI |
|
PI integrity is measured by compliance |
|
The reputation of the PI’s institution is at
stake |
|
Future funding can be jeopardized |
|
Funding authority credibility can be questioned |
|
As goes the public’s trust, so goes research |
|
|
|
|
Research - a systematic investigation, including
research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or
contribute to generalizable knowledge (regardlesss of what it might be
called) (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.102) |
|
|
|
45 CFR 46 applies if Human Subjects + DHHS Research - Exemptions (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/decisioncharts.htm) |
|
|
|
Awardees of DHHS-supported human subject
research and all entities that interact with, intervene upon, or have
potential access to private identifiable information of living persons are engaged
and are required to possess an applicable Assurance prior to human subjects
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/assurance/engage.htm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preparation - it’s never too early to consult
with the population, institutions, and IRB Chair(s) when planning the
research design |
|
Pre-application - Assurance and IRB approvals
are not required (needed prior to any award) |
|
PHS 398 Application – complete instructions |
|
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIR/STTR Application Instructions - don’t miss: |
|
I.C.1 Face Page - Item 4 - Human Subjects |
|
No Human Subjects |
|
Human Subjects Involved |
|
Exemptions from Regulations |
|
Human Subject Assurance Number |
|
NIH-Defined Phase III Clinical Trial* |
|
I.C.1 Face Page - Item 15 - Organization
Certification |
|
Human Subjects |
|
Transplantation of Human Fetal Tissue |
|
NIH Women and Minority Inclusion Policy* |
|
NIH Inclusion of Children Policy* |
|
Use of Embryonic Stem Cells |
|
I.C.8 Research Plan – 8.e - Human Subjects
Research |
|
Note: These are policies to which questions are
best addressed to NIH |
|
|
|
|
|
SBIR/STTR Application Highlights - don’t miss: |
|
|
|
I.C.1. Item 4 - Face Page – enter “yes” or “no”
for human subjects and exemptions; if yes for both, then enter E1-6 (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/section_1.html#e_humansubs)
-see footnote to 46.101(b) for limitations to exemptions |
|
I.C.1. Item 4 - Face Page - do not enter
Assurance number for the institution with the designated IRB (enter
“None”); if applicant possesses a Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) or
Federalwide Assurance (FWA), then enter number - check OHRP Website if not
sure |
|
(select link to MPA or FWA from http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIR/STTR Application entries - don’t miss: |
|
Research Plan/Item 8e – Human Subjects Research* |
|
|
|
Follow PHS 398 instructions carefully to avoid
your application from being designated incomplete: |
|
Human Subject/Exemption/Clinical/Clinical Trial
Status |
|
Exemption Categories – 1 through 6 (select as
applicable) |
|
Risks/Protections/Benefits/Importance |
|
Certificates of Confidentiality (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/index.htm
and |
|
http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/cert-con.htm) |
|
Collaborating Sites |
|
Engagement of sites in human subject research (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/assurance/engage.htm) |
|
*Note: Scenarios are given in the instructions
to assist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assurance to Comply with 45 CFR 46 Before Award |
|
Applicant will be notified by NIH in writing of
award |
|
Award conditioned on Assurances to OHRP from: |
|
Awardee |
|
All
sites engaged in human subject research |
|
Funding authority identifies the need for and
seeks Assurances through the awardee for all engaged sites |
|
Each site without a Federal-wide Assurance files
an FWA, designates a registered IRB; sends to OHRP (see instructions
at http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm) |
|
OHRP advice required for options other than FWA |
|
Awardee/PI may but need not contact OHRP |
|
|
|
|
|
OHRP Web-based FWA Filing and IRB Registration;
review in detail and act when timely (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm) |
|
Options to finding an IRB to designate: |
|
Establish your own (potential conflicts) |
|
Rely on suitable IRB of a collaborating site |
|
Locate willing MPA institution near subjects (http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/asearch.asp) |
|
Identify suitable independent IRB (see next
slide) |
|
Designated IRB must perform “local” review (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/local.htm) |
|
|
|
|
|
OHRP Website |
|
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/index.htm) - seek,
find, and fill needs |
|
Belmont Report (ethical principles) |
|
IRB Guidebook and Investigator 101 CD |
|
Training Videotapes and Workshops |
|
Common Findings in Noncompliance |
|
Links to Other Websites |
|
Independent Institutional Review Boards (for a
listing see http://www.advamed.org/solutions/reviewboards.shtml) - |
|
Note: URL not endorsed by OHRP - provided
solely as a courtesy; not all listed IRBs necessarily conform to OHRP
“local” IRB and conflict-free requirements (see previous slide) |
|
|
|
|
|
IRB Chair |
|
Pre-protocol planning to enhance and prevent
problems |
|
Arrange for investigator training to preserve
integrity |
|
Advice on exemptions and expedited review |
|
Expertise on human subject issues |
|
Referral to other sources of expertise |
|
OHRP Assurance Staff |
|
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpa-staff.htm#Table1) |
|
General SBIR/STTR questions - Assurance
Coordinators* |
|
IRB Registration questions - Helen Gordon |
|
Federalwide Assurance negotiations - Assurance
Coordinators* (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpa-staff.htm#Table2) |
|
*Note: Click on geographic location of
awardee for correct AC |
|
|
|
|
Doesn’t see PI and subject interests are same |
|
Investigator waits too long for IRB input |
|
Underestimates the value added by the IRB to the
integrity of the process and reputation of all |
|
PI’s unaware of accrual restrictions or is not
informed by funding authority until it’s too late |
|
PI falls victim to miscellaneous investigator
shortcomings (e.g., special protections, protocol revisions, adverse
events, and progress reports) (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/references/findings.pdf) |
|
|
|
|
Volunteers grant permission with IRB oversight
that is assured in advance |
|
Prepare early for human subject issues |
|
Know when and from where to get help |
|
Prepare your application with confidence |
|
Let the system work for you; know when it isn’t
& confirm with funding authority |
|
What’s good for subjects is good for you! |
|
|
|