Notes
Outline
Slide 1
Introduction and Overview
Why   -  Concepts
When -  Applicability
What  -  Process
How   -  Resources
Who   -  Human Assistance
Wow  -  Things That Can Go Wrong
Concepts
Volunteers - Human Subjects
Permission - Informed Consent
Oversight - Institutional Review Boards
Documentation - Assurance and Records
Self-Interest - What’s it to you?
Volunteers - Human Subjects
Other people and their private information don’t belong to the PI
The sheer value of the research does not automatically trump rights of people
Ask before you take unless IRB approves
Definition of a human subject
Definition of a Human Subject
Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains:
  data through intervention or  interaction  with the individual, or
  identifiable private information
Permission - Informed Consent
From the Nuremberg Code on, the right to say “no” is the first right of a subject
Permission of a duly informed volunteer is required unless the IRB says otherwise
Volunteers who are not of legal age for the intended procedure must also grant permission (if they’re able to do so)
Definitions of consent and assent
Definitions of Consent and Assent
Consent - legally effective agreement of the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative based on information that is given to the subject or the representative in language that is understandable
Assent - child’s affirmative agreement to participate in research
Permission - agreement of parent(s) or guardian to the participation of their child or ward in research
Oversight - Institutional Review Boards
An objective review panel under 45 CFR 46
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.102)
Competent for review of science & ethics
Adequate in number and composition
Voting members are free of conflict
Suitably composed for involved human subjects
Sufficient knowledge of local context
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/local.htm)
Documentation - Assurance and Records - Concepts
Prior written promise to meet minimum Federal standards to protect subjects
IRB minutes in required detail
Ongoing IRB certification and enduring records of all required reportable events
If it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen
Definitions of Assurance and Records
Documentation - Assurance and Records - Definition of Assurance
Assurance - a legally binding written document that commits a public or private entity to compliance with applicable Federal minimum standards for the protection of human subjects prior to engagement in Department or Agency conducted or supported research (i.e., prior binding promise to follow applicable rules) and includes citation of ethical principles, designated IRB, list of IRB members, IRB procedures, and institutional and investigator responsibilities
Documentation - Assurance and Records - Specification of Records
Records - An institution, or when appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and maintain:
Copies of all research proposals reviewed, any scientific evaluations, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted by investigators, and reports of injuries to subjects
Minutes of IRB meetings which shall be in sufficient detail to show attendance; actions taken; the vote on these actions; the basis for requiring changes in or disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controverted issues and their resolution
Documentation - Assurance and Records - Specification of Records
Records - An institution, or when appropriate an IRB, shall prepare and maintain:
Records of continuing review activities
Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and the investigators
A list of IRB members in the same detail as described in §46.103(b)(3)
Written procedures for the IRB in the same detail as described in §46.103(b)(4) and §46.103(b)(5).
Self-Interest - What’s it to you?
Defensible research must be ethical research
Rules that protect subjects protect the PI
PI integrity is measured by compliance
The reputation of the PI’s institution is at stake
Future funding can be jeopardized
Funding authority credibility can be questioned
As goes the public’s trust, so goes research
Applicability
Research - a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (regardlesss of what it might be called) (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm#46.102)
45 CFR 46 applies if  Human Subjects + DHHS Research - Exemptions (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/decisioncharts.htm)
Awardees of DHHS-supported human subject research and all entities that interact with, intervene upon, or have potential access to private identifiable information of living persons are engaged and are required to possess an applicable Assurance prior to human subjects (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/assurance/engage.htm)
Process - Pre-Application
Preparation - it’s never too early to consult with the population, institutions, and IRB Chair(s) when planning the research design
Pre-application - Assurance and IRB approvals are not required (needed prior to any award)
PHS 398 Application – complete instructions
(http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html)
Process - Instructions
SBIR/STTR Application Instructions - don’t miss:
I.C.1 Face Page - Item 4 - Human Subjects
No Human Subjects
Human Subjects Involved
Exemptions from Regulations
Human Subject Assurance Number
NIH-Defined Phase III Clinical Trial*
I.C.1 Face Page - Item 15 - Organization Certification
Human Subjects
Transplantation of  Human Fetal Tissue
NIH Women and Minority Inclusion Policy*
NIH Inclusion of Children Policy*
Use of Embryonic Stem Cells
I.C.8 Research Plan – 8.e - Human Subjects Research
Note: These are policies to which questions are best addressed to NIH
Process - Application Highlights
SBIR/STTR Application Highlights - don’t miss:
I.C.1. Item 4 - Face Page – enter “yes” or “no” for human subjects and exemptions; if yes for both, then enter E1-6 (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/section_1.html#e_humansubs) -see footnote to 46.101(b) for limitations to exemptions
I.C.1. Item 4 - Face Page - do not enter Assurance number for the institution with the designated IRB (enter “None”); if applicant possesses a Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) or Federalwide Assurance (FWA), then enter number - check OHRP Website if not sure
(select link to MPA or FWA from http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm)
Process - Application Entries
SBIR/STTR Application entries - don’t miss:
Research Plan/Item 8e – Human Subjects Research*
Follow PHS 398 instructions carefully to avoid your application from being designated incomplete:
Human Subject/Exemption/Clinical/Clinical Trial Status
Exemption Categories – 1 through 6 (select as applicable)
Risks/Protections/Benefits/Importance
Certificates of Confidentiality (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/index.htm and
http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/cert-con.htm)
Collaborating Sites
Engagement of sites in human subject research (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/assurance/engage.htm)
*Note: Scenarios are given in the instructions to assist.
Process - Pre-Award
Assurance to Comply with 45 CFR 46 Before Award
Applicant will be notified by NIH in writing of award
Award conditioned on Assurances to OHRP from:
 Awardee
 All sites engaged in human subject research
Funding authority identifies the need for and seeks Assurances through the awardee for all engaged sites
Each site without a Federal-wide Assurance files an FWA, designates a registered IRB; sends to OHRP (see instructions at  http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm)
OHRP advice required for options other than FWA
Awardee/PI may but need not contact OHRP
Specific Resources
OHRP Web-based FWA Filing and IRB Registration; review in detail and act when timely (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irbasur.htm)
Options to finding an IRB to designate:
Establish your own (potential conflicts)
Rely on suitable IRB of  a collaborating site
Locate willing MPA institution near subjects (http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/asearch.asp)
Identify suitable independent IRB (see next slide)
Designated IRB must perform “local” review (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/local.htm)
General Resources
OHRP Website
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/index.htm) - seek, find, and fill needs
Belmont Report (ethical principles)
IRB Guidebook and Investigator 101 CD
Training Videotapes and Workshops
Common Findings in Noncompliance
Links to Other Websites
Independent Institutional Review Boards (for a listing see http://www.advamed.org/solutions/reviewboards.shtml) -
Note: URL not endorsed by OHRP - provided solely as a courtesy; not all listed IRBs necessarily conform to OHRP “local” IRB and conflict-free requirements (see previous slide)
Human Assistance
IRB Chair
Pre-protocol planning to enhance and prevent problems
Arrange for investigator training to preserve integrity
Advice on exemptions and expedited review
Expertise on human subject issues
Referral to other sources of expertise
OHRP Assurance Staff
(http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpa-staff.htm#Table1)
General SBIR/STTR questions - Assurance Coordinators*
IRB Registration questions - Helen Gordon
Federalwide Assurance negotiations - Assurance Coordinators*  (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/dpa-staff.htm#Table2)
*Note: Click on geographic location of awardee for correct AC
Things That Can Go Wrong
Doesn’t see PI and subject interests are same
Investigator waits too long for IRB input
Underestimates the value added by the IRB to the integrity of the process and reputation of all
PI’s unaware of accrual restrictions or is not informed by funding authority until it’s too late
PI falls victim to miscellaneous investigator shortcomings (e.g., special protections, protocol revisions, adverse events, and progress reports) (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/references/findings.pdf)
Conclusions
Volunteers grant permission with IRB oversight that is assured in advance
Prepare early for human subject issues
Know when and from where to get help
Prepare your application with confidence
Let the system work for you; know when it isn’t & confirm with funding authority
What’s good for subjects is good for you!