SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR A DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS)
MULTIPLE PROJECT ASSURANCE (MPA) FOR COMPLIANCE WITH DHHS REGULATIONS
FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS (45 CFR 46), IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE FEDERAL POLICY (EFFECTIVE AUGUST 19, 1991),
AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE AMENDED.
THIS SAMPLE TEXT IS OFFERED AS A GUIDE TO PREPARERS
*****
For ease of identification, bold and italic entries apply to significant changes since initial introduction of this general MPA format in 1991. Care has been taken to avoid reordering of Part, Section, Category, and Item sequences to enable ready comparison with existing institutional text, whenever possible. This sample MPA text is electronically available by e-mail attachment upon request to cs19n@nih.gov. Use of OPRR’s electronic sample to create revised MPA text will automatically include all editorial changes in the sample.
*****
June 1999
NOTE: Please prepare this document on institutional letterhead and supply all information specific to your institution. All changes and individualized text should be highlighted to facilitate timely review and approval by OPRR.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
On behalf of DHHS, the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR) is responsible for the negotiation of assurances of compliance with Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 46 (45 CFR 46). OPRR has prepared this sample Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) document to assist institutions in developing their Assurances. Numerous Federal departments and agencies, including DHHS, share common basic provisions for the protection of human subjects, effective August 19, 1991. These provisions are known as the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (56FR28003), also referred to as the Common Rule. For DHHS, provisions of the Common Rule are included in 45 CFR 46 as Subpart A. Subparts B, C, and D remain unaltered other than for cross-references to exemptions which have been renumbered in Section 101(b). Citations of CFR titles and parts for each department and agency currently participating in the Common Rule are as follows:
| Central Intelligence Agency | Executive Order 12333 | ||
| Consumer Product Safety Commission | 16 CFR Part 1028 | ||
| Department of Agriculture | 7 CFR Part 1c | ||
| Department of Commerce | 15 CFR Part 27 | ||
| Department of Defense | 32 CFR Part 219 | ||
| Department of Education | 34 CFR Part 97 | ||
| Department of Energy | 10 CFR Part 745 | ||
| Department of Health and Human Services | 45 CFR Part 46 | ||
| Department of Housing and Urban Development | 24 CFR Part 60 | ||
| Department of Justice | 28 CFR Part 46 | ||
| Department of Transportation | 49 CFR Part 11 | ||
| Department of Veterans Affairs | 38 CFR Part 16 | ||
| Environmental Protection Agency | 40 CFR Part 26 | ||
| National Aeronautics and Space Administration | 14 CFR Part 1230 | ||
| National Science Foundation | 45 CFR Part 690 | ||
| Social Security Administration | Public Law 103-296 |
Citations by section (e.g., Section 110) in the sample document are intended to avoid
confusion over reference to Subpart A of DHHS's regulations (45 CFR
46) as opposed to those of other Federal departments and agencies. Subparts B, C, and D of 45 CFR 46 are explicitly included in the requirements
of any DHHS MPA.
MPA institutions generally elect to comply with all Subparts of 45 CFR 46 for any research conducted under their auspices
(i.e., regardless of the source of support). When an institution has elected to abide by 45 CFR 46, regardless of the source of support, all Subparts
of 45 CFR 46 are applicable to research even if it is not
federally sponsored or sponsored by Federal departments or agencies other than DHHS. This
has been taken into account in wording the sample text.
Federal departments and agencies are obligated to honor a DHHS MPA which has been approved
for Federal-wide use by OPRR. When a DHHS MPA is honored by other Federal departments and
agencies, reports to them which are required by the Common Rule (except certification)
must also be sent to OPRR (see Section 103).
The sample Assurance will, of course, have to be adapted to the organizational
structure of your institution. Additions, deletions, and alterations to the sample text
should be highlighted prior to submission to OPRR.
The sample Assurance can be completed by a single signatory institution or jointly
by two or more signatory institutions when appropriate changes for textual
consistency, signatures, and appendices are included. In addition, some provisions of the
sample MPA have been supplied as examples to illustrate how an institution might elect to
manage its administrative procedures. Also, more than one Office of Research
Administration for human subjects(ORA) may exist where two signatory institutions elect to rely on a common
IRB but otherwise administer research initiatives independently. In such a
situation, each signatory institution would be expected to have the equivalent
of an ORA instead of only one ORA at the primary institution which is relied upon by all
signatory institutions.
The sample DHHS MPA consists of a statement of principles, policies, and applicability
(Part 1), responsibilities (Part 2), provision for signatures of all principal parties
(Part 3), and appendices (Part 4). Any of the appendices that undergo change must
be submitted to OPRR for approval as they occur. The appendices are as follows:
Appendix A lists all components of the signatory institution(s) that may operate under some other name (e.g., "The Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center" is actually a component of the National Institutes of Health). Appendix A includes only inseparable legal components of the signatory institution(s). Of those, only components that might apply for Federal human subject research support in their own names or participate in such research need to be listed in Appendix A. Appendix A does not include legally separate institutions that are merely professionally or contractually affiliated with the signatory institution(s).
Appendix B lists all legally separate institutions that have or qualify for formal affiliation with the signatory institution(s) for the protection of human subjects. Such standing affiliations are entered into through an OPRR-approved Inter-Institutional Amendment (IIA). IIAs assure compliance with the DHHS regulations and acknowledge reliance on the IRB(s) of the signatory institution(s) when the IIA affiliate serves as a performance site for research conducted in the name of the MPA signatory institution(s). Please note that a research activity conducted by an IIA affiliate, when not under the auspices of the MPA institution with which it is affiliated, is not covered by the IIA and a separate Assurance document for that activity would be required. For example, a county hospital with an IIA to an MPA held by a nearby university would be covered by the IIA for federally sponsored research directly awarded to the university but would not be covered if the hospital directly applied for Federal support in its own name (whether or not the university might also be involved).
Appendix C consists of one or more IRB membership lists for all signatory institutions of the MPA. Each such list must be submitted using the sample format (or its retyped equivalent) and must be dated. If there is more than one IRB, it will be necessary to cite all signatory institutions that rely on each and the intended scope (e.g., biomedical, behavioral, both, or otherwise). Changes in membership do not require obtaining a revised signature page for the MPA. However, the list itself (which is basic to the MPA) must be signed by the IRB Chair and forwarded to OPRR as changes in IRB membership occur.
Appendix D consists of a one page abstract of the institutional program of protections (i.e., operational written procedures and reporting responsibilities) which apply to the specific MPA institution or group of institutions and an organizational line diagram that shows the interrelationships between MPA signatory officials, the ORA, the IRB, and significant components from which investigators may be expected to submit human subject proposals.
In preparing the sample, we have attempted to include all of the elements necessary for
compliance with the regulations. We invite you to view this sample Assurance as an aid in
developing your Assurance and would appreciate your comments as to its adequacy in
assisting you in that development. A glossary of terms has been included in this preface
for your convenience to help in interpreting the sample MPA document.
If you have any general questions, please contact the Adjunct
Medical Officer, DHSP at 301/402-5942 (Fax: 301-402-2803; E-mail:
kd41f@nih.gov) or the Chief of the Assurance Branch, DHSP at 301/402-5218
x211 (Fax: 301-402-0527; E-mail: cs19n@nih.gov).
Specific negotiations will be conducted by the OPRR
staff person who is assigned review responsibilities for MPA institutions on the basis
of state or country of location. Staff assignments are available by fax at 301-594-0464.
| * Affiliate | - | an institution or independent investigator which
legally separate from the signatory (s) to an Assurance but has a formal affiliation
with the signatory institution(s) through an OPRR-approved Inter-Institutional Amendment
or Assurance |
| *Agreement | - | a document (e.g., AII or NIA) which assures individual compliance with
45 CFR 46 by an independent non-institutional
investigator |
| *Agreement for an Independent Investigator (AII) | - | an OPRR-approved document entered into between a signatory institution
and a non-institutional affiliate investigator (e.g., private practitioner) which assures
compliance with 45 CFR 46 for specified
activities that are not CPRP in nature |
| *Amendment | - | any formal addition to an approved Assurance (e.g., CA or IIA to an
MPA) |
| * Assurance | - | an OPRR-approved document which assures
institutional compliance with 45 CFR 46(e.g., SPA,
CPA, or MPA) |
| *Collaboration | - | engagement by two or more entities in human subject research by virtue
of subject accrual, transfer of identifiable information, and/or in exchange of something
of value, such as material support (e.g., money, drugs, identifiable specimens),
coauthorship, intellectual property, or credits |
| * Component | - | any entity that is legally inseparable from the
signatory institution(s) |
| *Cooperative Amendment (CA) | - | a document requiring OPRR approval (formerly referred to as a
Cooperative Agreement) which is jointly agreed to by two or more MPA institutions (or
otherwise with prior OPRR consultation) for the purpose of specifying arrangements for
relying on one another's IRBs to avoid duplication of effort |
| * Cooperative Project Assurance (CPA) |
- | an Assurance designed to accommodate CPRP multi-protocol, multi-site
research specifically recognized by OPRR |
| * Cooperative Protocol Research Programs (CPRP) |
- | DHHS multi-site, multi-protocol clinical trials which are explicitly
recognized by OPRR as suited for CPAs (e.g., cooperative oncology trials of the National
Cancer Institute) |
| * Federal | - | departments and agencies of the Federal government that are a party to
the Federal Policy (see 56FR28003 and page I of the Preface to the MPA sample
text) |
| * Federal Policy (56FR28003) |
- | minimum Federal standards for the protection of human research subjects,
effective August 19, 1991 (see FR Volume 56, No. 117, Tuesday, June 18, 1991), and
contained in 45 CFR 46 as Subpart
A - also known as the Common Rule |
| * 45 CFR 46 (DHHS Regulations) |
- | Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, which consists of Subpart A (the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects) and Subparts B, C, and D which apply to
fetuses, pregnant women and in-vitro fertilization of human ova; prisoners; and children
as vulnerable subject populations |
| * Inter-Institutional Amendment (IIA) |
- | an amendment to an MPA for compliance with 45 CFR
46 by affiliate institutions that do not have their own MPA, regularly serve as a
performance site for research conducted by an Multiple Project Assurance signatory
institution(s), and usually do not possess their own Institutional
Review Boards. |
| * Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) |
- | a DHHS Assurance which applies during fixed and renewable periods to a
broad spectrum of unrelated research activities |
| * Noninstitutional Investigator Agreement (NIA) |
- | an OPRR-authorized document entered into between a signatory institution
and a non-institutional affiliate investigator (e.g., private practitioner) which assures
compliance with 45 CFR 46 for OPRR-recognized CPRP
activities (e.g., cooperative oncology group trials) |
| * Office of Research Administration for Human Subject Research (ORA) |
- | the resources maintained by each signatory institution or the primary
signatory institution (if applicable) which provides a central focus for researchers,
IRB(s), and administrators in processing protocols, arranging IRB review, keeping records,
reporting, and communicating pertinent information about human subject research |
| * Performance Site | - | any entity (institution or independent investigator)
where human subjects are involved in research for which an MPA, IIA, SPA, CPA,
AII, or NIA is required |
| * Primary Signatory Institution | - | -where applicable, the signatory institution of two or more
which may be chosen to assume the function of the ORA for all signatory institutions |
| * Signatory Institution | - | an institution which OPRR finds eligible to enter into an Assurance and
which has signed the Assurance |
| * Single Project Assurance (SPA) |
- | an Assurance document which is submitted to OPRR by an
institution, upon request, for a specific DHHS research activity at a
performance site where an MPA, IIA, or CPA, does not apply. |
[Please prepare on institutional letterhead]
SAMPLE MPA TEXT
Multiple Project Assurance of Compliance with DHHS Regulations
for Protection of Human Research Subjects
(Name of Signatory Institution[s]), hereinafter known as the
"institution" (see Appendix A), hereby gives assurance, as specified below, that
it will comply with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations for the
protection of human research subjects, 45 CFR Part 46, as amended to include provisions of
the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (56FR28003) as Subpart A, and as
may be further amended during the approval period for this Assurance.
PART 1 - PRINCIPLES, POLICIES, AND APPLICABILITY
| I. | Ethical Principles |
|
| A. | This institution is guided by the ethical
principles regarding all research involving humans as subjects, as set forth in the report
of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and
Behavioral Research (entitled: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of
Human Subjects of Research [the "Belmont Report"]),
regardless of whether the research is subject to Federal regulation or with whom conducted
or source of support (i.e., sponsorship). |
|
| B. | All institutional and non-institutional
performance sites for this institution, domestic or foreign, will be obligated by this
institution to conform to ethical principles which are at least equivalent to those of
this institution, as cited in the previous paragraph or as may be determined by the DHHS
Secretary. |
|
| II. | Institutional Policy |
|
| A. | All requirements of Title 45, Part 46, of the
Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR 46) will be met for all federally-sponsored
research, and all other human subject research regardless of sponsorship
(1),
except as otherwise noted in this Assurance. Federal (all departments and agencies bound
by the Federal Policy) funds for which this Assurance applies may not be expended for
research involving human subjects unless the requirements of this Assurance have been
satisfied. |
|
| B. | Except for those categories specifically exempted
or waived under Section 101(b)(1-6) or 101(i), all research covered by this Assurance will
be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) which has been established
under a Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) with OPRR or as may be otherwise
agreed to by OPRR (see Part 1, II, G). The involvement of human subjects in
research covered by this Assurance will not be permitted until an appropriate IRB has
reviewed and approved the research protocol and informed consent has been obtained
from the subject or the subject's legal representative (see Sections 111, 116, and 117), unless
properly waived by the IRB under Section 116(c),(d) or by any applicable waiver under
Section 101(i). |
|
| C. | This institution assures that before human subjects are involved in nonexempt research covered by this Assurance, the IRB(s) will give proper consideration to: | |
|
||
| D. | Certification of IRB review and approval for all
Federally-sponsored research involving human subjects will be submitted to the Office of
Research Administration (ORA) for forwarding to the appropriate Federal department or
agency. Compliance will occur within the time and in the manner prescribed for forwarding
certifications of IRB review to DHHS or other Federal departments or agencies for which
this Assurance applies. |
|
| As provided for under section 118,
applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects will
not require IRB review and approval prior to award. However, except for research exempted
or waived under Section 101 (b) or (i), no human subjects may be involved in any project
supported by such awards until IRB review and approval has been certified to the
appropriate Federal department or agency. |
||
| As required under Section 119, the IRB will
review proposed involvement of human subjects in Federal research
activities undertaken without prior intent for such involvement,
but will not permit such involvement until certification of the IRB's review and approval
is received by the appropriate Federal department or agency. |
||
| E. | Institutions that are not direct signatories to
this Assurance are not authorized to cite this Assurance. This institution will ensure
that such other institutions and investigators not bound by the provisions of this
Assurance will satisfactorily assure compliance with 45 CFR 46,
as required (see Part 2, I, D and II, K), as a prior condition for involvement in DHHS-sponsored
human subject research which is under the auspices of this institution (see
Part 1, III, A). Institutions that have entered into an Inter-Institutional Amendment
(IIA) to this Assurance must submit a Single Project Assurance (SPA) to the Office for
Protection from Research Risks (OPRR) for DHHS-sponsored research, when that research is
not conducted under the auspices of a signatory institution to this Assurance. |
|
| F. | This institution will ensure that any collaborating
entities (i.e., those entities engaged in human subject research by virtue of subject
accrual, transfer of identifiable information, and/or in exchange of something of value,
such as material support [e.g., money, drugs, or identifiable specimens], coauthorship,
intellectual property , or credits) materially engaged in the conduct of
non-federal sponsored research involving human subjects will possess mechanisms to protect
human research subjects that are at least equivalent to those procedures provided for in
the ethical principles to which this institution is committed (see Part 1, I). |
|
| G. | This institution will comply with the
requirements set forth in Section 114 of the regulations regarding cooperative research
projects. When research covered by this Assurance is conducted at or in cooperation with
another entity, all provisions of this Assurance remain in effect for that research. This
institution may accept, for the purpose of meeting the IRB review requirements, the review
of an IRB established under another DHHS MPA. Such acceptance must be (a) in writing, (b)
approved and signed by an official of this institution's Office of Research
Administration(s), and (c) approved and signed by correlative officials of each of the
other cooperating institutions (i.e., a Cooperative Amendment to this MPA).
The original of the signed understanding will serve as an addendum to this Assurance and
will be forwarded to the OPRR of DHHS by the ORA(s) for OPRR approval. |
|
| H. | This institution will exercise appropriate
administrative overview to ensure that the institution's policies and procedures designed
for protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects are being effectively applied in
compliance with this Assurance. |
|
| I. | Description of this institution's policy for
the protection of human subjects is contained in its internal written procedures which are
available to OPRR and other Federal departments or agencies, upon request. Appendix D to
this Assurance abstracts pertinent organizational, personnel, and reporting procedures
sufficient to describe the substance and relative prominence conferred upon the protection
of subjects. |
|
| III. | Applicability
|
|
| A. | Except for research in which the only involvement of humans is in one or more of the categories exempted or waived under Section 101(b)(1-6) or 101(i), this Assurance applies to all research involving human subjects, and all other activities which even in part involve such research, regardless of sponsorship1, if one or more of the following apply: | |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| B. | All human subject research which is exempt under
Section 101(b)(1-6) or 101(i) will be conducted in accordance with: (1) the Belmont
Report, (2) this institution's administrative procedures to ensure valid claims of
exemption, and (3) orderly accounting for such activities. |
|
| C. | Components of this institution are bound by the
provisions of this Assurance. Those components which can be expected to participate in
human subject research sponsored by DHHS or other Federal departments or agencies for
which this Assurance applies are identified in Appendix A. Appendix A will be revised as
changes occur and revisions forwarded to OPRR. |
|
| D. | This Assurance must be accepted by other Federal
departments or agencies that are bound by the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects when appropriate for the research in question and therefore applies to all human
subject research so sponsored.1 Research that is neither
conducted nor supported by a Federal department or agency but is subject to regulation as
defined in Section 102(e) must be reviewed and approved, in compliance with Sections 101,
102, and 107 through 117. |
1 Note to Preparers:
Compliance with 45 CFR 46 regardless of
sponsorship is a choice elected by most institutions for internal consistency of
operations. Election will require compliance with all requirements of 45 CFR 46 (Subparts
A through D) and
acceptance by other Federal departments and agencies without the need for preparing
separate and additional Assurances.
PART 2 - RESPONSIBILITIES2
| I. | Institution |
| A. | This institution acknowledges that it bears full
responsibility for the performance of all research involving human subjects, covered by
this Assurance, including complying with Federal, state, or local laws as they may relate
to such research. |
|
| B. | This institution will require appropriate additional
safeguards in research that involves: (1) fetuses, pregnant women, or human ova invitro
fertilization (see 45 CFR 46 Subpart
B), (2) prisoners (see 45 CFR 46 Subpart C), (3)
children (see 45 CFR 46 Subpart D), (4) the cognitively
impaired, or (5) other potentially vulnerable groups. |
|
| C. | This institution, including all its named components (see
Appendix A), acknowledges and accepts its responsibilities for protecting the rights and
welfare of human subjects of research covered by this Assurance. |
|
| D. | This institution is responsible for acquiring appropriate
Assurances or Amendments, when requested, and certifications of IRB review and approval
for federally sponsored research from all its standing affiliates (see Appendix B) and
Assurances or Agreements for all others, domestic or foreign, which may otherwise become
affiliated on a limited basis in such research. |
|
| E. | This institution is responsible for ensuring that no performance
site cooperating in the conduct of federally sponsored research for which
this Assurance applies does so without Federal department or agency approval of
an appropriate assurance of compliance, in whatever appropriate
form, and satisfaction of IRB certification requirements. |
|
| F. | In accordance with the compositional requirements of Section
107, this institution has established the IRB(s) listed in the attached roster(s) (see
Appendix C). Certain research supported by the U.S. Department of Education will be
reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Title 34 CFR Parts 350 and 356 which
require that the IRB(s) include at least one person who is primarily concerned with the
welfare of handicapped children or mentally disabled persons. |
|
| G. | This institution will provide both meeting space and
sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and record-keeping duties. |
|
| H. | This institution recognizes that involvement in research
activities of any OPRR-recognized Cooperative Protocol Research Programs (CPRPs)
will involve additional reporting and record-keeping requirements related to human subject
protections. |
|
| I. | This institution is responsible for ensuring that it and all
its affiliates comply fully with all applicable Federal policies and guidelines, including
those concerning notification of seropositivity, counseling, and safeguarding
confidentiality where research activities directly or indirectly involve the study of
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). |
| II. | Office of Research Administration for Human
Subject Research (ORA) |
[Please complete for each ORA if more
than one signatory institution possesses an ORA] |
| A. | The ORA(s) will receive from investigators,
through their supervisors, all research protocols which involve human subjects, keep
investigators informed of decisions and administrative processing, and return all
disapproved protocols to them. |
|
| B. | The ORA(s) is responsible for reviewing the
preliminary determinations of exemption by investigators and supervisors and for making
the final determination based on Section 101 of the regulations. Notice of concurrence for
all exempt research will be promptly conveyed in writing to the investigator. All
nonexempt research will be forwarded to the appropriate IRB. |
|
| C. | The ORA(s) will make the preliminary
determination of eligibility for expedited review procedures (see Section 110). Expedited
review of research activities will not be permitted where full board review is required. |
|
| D. | The ORA(s) will review all research (whether
exempt or not) and decide whether the institution will permit the research. If approved by
the IRB, but not permitted by the ORA, the ORA will promptly convey notice to the
investigator and the IRB Chair. Neither the ORA nor any other office of the institution
may approve a research activity that has been disapproved by the appropriate IRB. |
|
| E. | The ORA(s) will forward certification of IRB
approval of proposed research to the appropriate Federal department or agency only after
all IRB-required modifications have been incorporated to the satisfaction of the IRB. |
|
| F. | The ORA(s) will designate procedures for the
retention of signed consent documents for at least three years past completion of the
research activity. |
|
| G. | The ORA(s) will maintain and arrange access for
inspection of IRB records as provided for in Section 115. |
|
| H. | The ORA(s) is responsible for ensuring
constructive communication among the research administrators, department heads, research
investigators, clinical care staff, human subjects, and institutional officials as a means
of maintaining a high level of awareness regarding the safeguarding of the rights and
welfare of the subjects. |
|
| I. | The ORA(s) will arrange for and document in its
records that each individual who conducts or reviews human subject research has first been
provided with a copy of this Assurance, as well as with ready access to copies of 45 CFR 46, regulations of other Federal departments or agencies as
may apply, the Belmont Report, and all other pertinent Federal policies and guidelines
related to the involvement of human subjects in research. |
|
| J. | The ORA(s) will report promptly to the IRB(s), appropriate institutional officials, the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR), and any other sponsoring Federal department or agency head: | |
|
||
| K. | The ORA(s) will ensure (a) solicitation
(or confirmation where applicable assurances to comply already exist),
receipt, and management of all assurances of compliance (whatever the appropriate
format), and (b) certifications of IRB review (where appropriate) for all performance
sites to this institution (including those listed in Appendix B) and
subsequent submission of new documents to the proper Federal
department or agency authorities (e.g., OPRR for DHHS)
as a condition for involvement of each site in human subject
research activities sponsored by DHHS or any other Federal department or agency for which
this Assurance applies. |
|
| L. | The ORA will ensure that all affiliated
performance sites that are not otherwise required to submit assurances of compliance with
Federal regulations for the protection of research subjects at least document mechanisms
to implement the equivalent of ethical principles to which this institution is committed
(see Part 1, I). |
|
| M. | When an IRB of this institution accepts
responsibility for review of research which is subject to this Assurance and conducted by
any independent investigator who is not otherwise subject to the provisions of this
Assurance, the ORA will either: (a) obtain and retain an
Noninstitutional Investigator Agreement (NIA) for CPRP activities (with copy to
the investigator and the authorizing CPRP) or (b) obtain an Agreement for an Independent
Investigator (AII) for review and approval by the appropriate Federal department or agency
for non-CPRP activities to document the investigator's commitment to abide:
(1) by the same requirements for the protection of human research subjects as does this
institution(s) and (2) the determinations of the IRB(s). |
|
| N. | The ORA(s) assumes responsibility for ensuring
conformance with special reporting requirements for any OPRR-recognized CPRPs
in which the signatory institution(s) participate(s). |
|
| O. | The ORA(s) will be responsible for procedural and
record-keeping audits not less than once every year for the purpose of detecting,
correcting, and reporting (as required) administrative and/or material breaches in
uniformly protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects as required at least by the
regulations and as may otherwise be additionally required by this institution(s). |
|
| P. | The ORA(s) will ensure compliance with the
requirements set forth in this Assurance and Section 114 regarding cooperative research
projects. In particular, where the IRB of another institution with a DHHS MPA is relied
upon, the ORA(s) will ensure thatdocumentation of this reliance will be (a) in writing,
(b) approved and signed by the ORA(s), (c) approved and signed by the correlative
officials of each of the other cooperating institutions, and (d) retained by the ORA for
at least three years past completion of the research project, if limited in
scope to a specific research project or retained as a permanent
addendum to the MPA if not restricted to a specific project. For
all Cooperative Amendments (CAs), the ORA(s) will forward the original of
the required signed understanding to OPRR for approval and inclusion in this
Assurance as an addendum. |
|
| III. | Institutional Review Board (IRB) |
|
| A. | The IRB(s) will review, and have the authority to
approve, require modification in, or disapprove all research activities, including
proposed changes in previously approved human subject research. For approved research, the
IRB will determine which activities require continuing review more frequently than every
twelve months or need verification that no changes have occurred if there was a previous
IRB review and approval. |
|
| B. | IRB decisions and requirements for modifications
will be promptly conveyed to investigators and the ORA, in writing. Written notification
of decisions to disapprove will be accompanied by reasons for the decision with provision
of an opportunity for reply by the investigator, in person or in writing. |
|
| C. | Initial and continuing convened IRB reviews and
approvals will occur in compliance with 45 CFR 46 and provisions
of this Assurance for each project unless properly found to be exempt (Section 101[b] or [i]) by the Office
of Research Administration. Continuing reviews will be preceded by IRB receipt of
appropriate progress reports from the investigator, including available study-wide
findings. |
|
| D. | The IRB(s) will observe the quorum requirements
of Section 108(b). This institution's IRB(s) has effective knowledge of subject
populations, institutional constraints, differing legal requirements, and other factors
which can foreseeably contribute to a determination of risks and benefits to subjects and
subjects' informed consent and can properly judge the adequacy of information to be
presented to subjects in accordance with requirements of Sections 103(d), 107(a), 111, and
116. |
|
| E. | The IRB(s) will determine, in accordance with the
criteria found at 45 CFR 46.111 and Federal policies and
guidelines for involvement of human subjects in HIV research, that protections for human
research subjects are adequate. |
|
| F. | The IRB(s) will ensure that legally effective
informed consent will be obtained and documented in a manner that meets the requirements
of Sections 116 and 117. The IRB will have the authority to observe or have a third party
observe the consent process. |
|
| G. | Where appropriate, the IRB(s) will determine that
adequate additional protections are ensured for fetuses, pregnant women, prisoners, and
children, as required by Subparts B, C, and D of 45 CFR 46. The
IRB(s) will notify OPRR promptly when IRB membership(s) is modified to satisfy
requirements of 45 CFR 46.304 and when the IRB fulfills
its duties under 45 CFR 46.305(c). |
|
| H. | Scheduled meetings of the IRB(s) for review of
each research activity will occur not less than every 12 months and may be more frequent,
if required by the IRB on the basis of degree of risk to subjects. The IRB may be called
into an interim review session by the Chairperson at the request of any IRB member or
institutional official to consider any matter concerned with the rights and welfare of any
subject. |
|
| I. | The IRB(s) will prepare and maintain adequate
documentation of its activities in accordance with Section 46.115 and in conformance with
Office of Research Administration requirements. |
|
| J. | The IRB(s) will forward to the Office of Research Administration any significant or material finding or action, at least to include the following: | |
|
||
| K. | In accordance with Section 113, the IRB(s) will
have the authority to suspend or terminate previously approved research that is not being
conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with
unexpected serious harm to subjects. |
|
| L. | The IRB(s) for this institution will ensure
effective input (consultants or voting or nonvoting members) for all initial and
continuing reviews conducted on behalf of performance sites where there will be human
research subjects. IRB minutes will document attendance of those other than regular voting
members. The IRB list(s) in Appendix C includes those who are identified as knowledgeable
about any affiliate institution having entered into an Inter-Institutional Amendment or
other institutional performance site for which an Assurance is required when
relying on one or more of the IRBs of this institution. |
|
| M. | The IRB(s) will act with reasonable dispatch,
upon request, to provide full board review of protocols of OPRR-recognized Cooperative
Protocol Research Programs (CPRP). The IRB will not employ expedited review procedures for
CPRP protocols when they are to be entered into for the purpose of research. Although
emergency medical care based on such protocols is permitted without prior IRB approval,
patients receiving emergency care under these conditions will not be counted as research
subjects and resultant data will not be used for research purposes. |
|
| N. | Certifications of IRB review and approval will be
forwarded through the ORA to the appropriate Federal department or agency for research
sponsored by such departments or agencies. |
|
| IV. | Research Investigator |
|
| A. | Research investigators acknowledge and accept
their responsibility for protecting the rights and welfare of human research subjects and
for complying with all applicable provisions of this Assurance. |
|
| B. | Research investigators who intend to involve human
research subjects will not make the final determination of exemption from applicable
Federal regulations or provisions of this Assurance. |
|
| C. | Research investigators are responsible for
providing a copy of the IRB-approved >informed consent document to each subject
at the time of consent, unless the IRB has specifically waived this requirement. All
signed consent documents are to be retained in a manner approved by the Office of Research
Administration. |
|
| D. | Research investigators will promptly report
proposed changes in previously approved human subject research activities to the IRB. The
proposed changes will not be initiated without IRB review and approval, except where
necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subjects. |
|
| E. | Research investigators are responsible for
reporting progress of approved research to the Office of Research Administration, as often
as and in the manner prescribed by the approving IRB on the basis of risks to subjects,
but not less than once per year. |
|
| F. | Research investigators will promptly report to
the IRB any injuries or other unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or
others. |
|
| G. | No research investigator who is obligated by the provisions of this Assurance, any associated Inter-Institutional Amendment, or Noninstitutional Investigator Agreement will seek to obtain research credit for, or use data from, patient interventions that constitute the provision of emergency medical care without prior IRB approval. A physician may provide emergency medical care to a patient without prior IRB review and approval, to the extent permitted by law (see Section 116[f]). However, such activities will not be counted as research nor the data used in support of research.. |
|
| H. | Research investigators will advise the IRB, Office of Research Administration and the appropriate officials of other institutions of the intent to admit human subjects (e.g., into a hospital) who are involved in research protocols for which this Assurance or any related Inter-Institutional Amendment or Noninstitutional Investigator Agreement applies. When such admissions are a planned part of DHHS-supported research, those institutions must possess an applicable OPRR-approved Assurance prior to involvement of such persons as human subjects in those research protocols at those institutions. |
|
| V. | Affiliated Institutions and Investigators (i.e., all performance sites, with or without IIAs) |
|
| A. | Each performance site to
this institution that is involved in federally sponsored research
activities must provide to the Office of Research Administration an appropriate written
assurance of compliance with the Belmont Report and the Federal Policy, to
include Subparts B, C, and D or 45 CFR 46
where appropriate (or equivalent protections if a foreign site),
for review and approval, as specified by the sponsoring Federal department or agency
(e.g., by OPRR for DHHS), prior to involvement of human subjects or expenditure of funds
or other support to do so. |
|
| B. | Each institutional performance site
must respond to a request by the Office of Research Administration of this institution for
an Inter-Institutional Amendment, SPA, or CPA (as appropriate),
whichever is most suited to the circumstances. |
|
| C. | Each non-institutional performance
site (e.g., a private practice physician not otherwise an employee of this
institution or who otherwise would not ordinarily be bound by the provisions of this
Assurance or any other applicable institutional Assurance) who is
involved in human subject research of this institution must respond to a request by the
Office of Research Administration of this institution for either an Agreement
for an Independent Investigator or a Noninstitutional Investigator Agreement,
as appropriate,depending on the nature of the research activity. |
|
| D. | Performance sites that are legally separable from
this institution (whether an institutional or non-institutional performance
site) are not authorized to cite this Assurance. |
|
Footnote 2 Note to Preparers: |
||
********************************************************************************
FOR DHHS USE ONLY
[Please Submit with MPA# and Signatory Institution Names and Resubmit as Changes Occur]
DHHS MPA# ____________
Date: ________________
Appendix A
COMPONENTS WHICH ARE LEGALLY INSEPARABLE FROM EACH DESIGNATED SIGNATORY
INSTITUTION
AND PARTICIPATE IN HUMAN RESEARCH OF THE SIGNATORY
| MPA Signatory Institution #1(i.e., Primary): | |||
| Components that Participate in Human Research | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| MPA Signatory Institution #2: | |||
| Components that Participate in Human Research | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| MPA Signatory Institution #3: | |||
| Components that Participate in Human Research | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| MPA Signatory Institution #4: | |||
| Components that Participate in Human Research | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| MPA Signatory Institution #5: | |||
| Components that Participate in Human Research | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
Please check here if there are no suitable components for entry.
[Please Submit with MPA# and Signatory Institution Names and
Resubmit as Changes Occur]
DHHS MPA #: ________
Date: ________________
Appendix B
STANDING AFFILIATES WHICH ARE LEGALLY SEPARATE FROM EACH DESIGNATED SIGNATORY INSTITUTION AND POSSESS OPRR-APPROVED INTER-INSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
| MPA Signatory Institution #1 (Primary): | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| Affiliate Institutions: | |||
| MPA Signatory Institution #2: | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| Affiliate Institutions: | |||
| MPA Signatory Institution #3: | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| Affiliate Institutions: | |||
| MPA Signatory Institution #4: | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| Affiliate Institutions: | |||
| MPA Signatory Institution #5: | |||
| Name: | City: | State: | |
| Affiliate Institutions: | |||
Please check here if there are no suitable standing affiliates for entry.
Appendix C, Institutional Review Board (IRB) Membership Roster
Appendix D consists of both a one page narrative and an organizational line diagram. It is intended to be an abstract of more complete written procedures that reside at your institution and are available, on a need-to-know request basis, by any Federal department or agency to which this MPA applies.
Please prepare a brief one page description which outlines the salient aspects of institutional policy and procedure for the protection of human subjects. Please includeattention to required operational written procedures (Section 103[b][4]) and reporting responsibilities (Section 103[b][5] and Section103[f]) which apply to your specific MPA institution or group of institutions. An accompanying organizational line diagram will permit showing the vertical and other interrelationships between MPA signatory officials, the ORA, the IRB, and significant components from which investigators may be expected to submit human subject proposals.
The purpose of this abstract is to identify and highlight operational responsibilities and relationships between parties who play a role in ensuring administrative compliance with procedures for review, critical decision-making, approvals, correspondence and record-keeping, and reporting to both institutional personnel and sponsoring officials. Reporting includes: (1) changes in IRB membership or MPA signatory officials, (2) certification of IRB review and approval, and (3) problems, noncompliance, and suspensions or terminations of IRB approval. It is important to include audit and training responsibilities and how they relate to investigators, IRB personnel, and institutional staff in direct support of the IRB and indirect support of human subject protections by all institutional staff. The process of identification and diagramming will help confirm and conceive operational aspects of a sound conceptual program.
The narrative on this page and the accompanying organizational line diagram should be sufficiently detailed to identify: (1) specific persons by name and title who have singularly essential roles (e.g., IRB Administrator), (2) other persons by role where more than one person serves the same function (e.g., Department Heads), and (3) how they organizationally relate (e.g., reporting channels) for at least the following procedures, requirements, and/or responsibilities:
- consideration by investigators of human subject proposals
- submission of appropriate proposals for IRB review
- management of proposals for which IRB review is intended
- written communication of IRB actions
- delineation to investigators of their responsibilities for continuing progress reports
- compliance by all collaborators in federally sponsored human subject research
- timely continuing review
- required record-keeping
- required reporting
- communication with investigators, IRB members, IRB staff, institutional personnel and subjects
- training of investigators, IRB members, IRB staff, and other appropriate institutional personnel, and
- institutional self-audit.
Changes in internal policy and procedures that are abstracted in Appendix D will require an update of this Appendix and forwarding to OPRR, as changes occur.
1.
Note to Preparers: Compliance with 45 CFR 46 regardless of sponsorship is a choice elected by most institutions for internal consistency of operations. Election will require compliance with all requirements of 45 CFR 46 (Subparts A through D) and acceptance by other Federal departments and agencies without the need for preparing separate and additional Assurances.
2.
Note to Preparers: This Part contains several administrative provisions that may be handled differently from one institution to another. Discretionary changes are expected. Please remember to highlight any changes to help speed review and approval.
Policy | Assurances | OHRP Home Page
If you have questions about human subject research, click
ohrp@osophs.dhhs.gov
If you have questions/suggestions about this web
page, click Webmaster
Updated August 26, 2002