Exhibit 300 (BY2010) - CMS Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

1. Date of Submission:

2008-09-08

2. Agency:

009

3. Bureau:

38

4. Name of this Capital Asset:

CMS Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

5. Unique Project Identifier:

009-38-01-02-01-1150-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2010?

Operations and Maintenance

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?

FY2007

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.

This investment is for maintenance of the Medicare Beneficiary Database (MBD). The Medicare Beneficiary Database provides CMS with a singular, authoritative, database of comprehensive data on individuals in Medicare program to support ongoing and expanded program administration, service delivery modalities, and payment coverage options. This collection will contain a complete "beneficiary insurance profile" that reflects the individual's Medicare health insurance coverage and Medicare health plan and demonstration enrollment. This effort requires the integration and standardization of different types of beneficiary data that were previously fragmented and often redundant within isolated CMS legacy systems. Other agencies such as the states, RRB and SSA use MBD data to administer their programs. In addition, MBD data is relied upon by many federal oversight and law enforcement agencies, and hundreds of research projects sponsored by both federal and private research institutions. The MMA legislation significantly expanded the role of the MBD, as well as adding significant changes to the size and functions of the system. The MBD houses current and historical beneficiary data from 2000. MBD data includes beneficiary insurance profile data for over 60M beneficiary, who have been or are currently entitled to Medicare, are disabled and entitled to Medicare, or have End Stage Renal Disease. Maintenance supports continuity for the following fielded system functions: DATA SHARING-MBD centralizes the receipt and storage and protection of large quantities of data, manages entities accessing the data, and provides data to downstream systems. DUAL ELIGIBLES- MBD provides centralized receipt of low income determinations from SSA and the States, deems beneficiary that qualify as dual-eligible according to legislation, ensures low income beneficiaries are covered by identifying those that are uncovered and initiating an automated enrollment into a Plan, and provides critical information to the CMS areas responsible for coordinating the process with the beneficiary and the Plans. GUI/WUI-The MBD user interface provides beneficiary level data for CMS staff to respond to beneficiary issues. QUERY SERVICES-MBD provides online and batch views of Part D data to outside entities within the Part D network of systems.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?

yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?

2008-04-10

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?

yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?

Waiver Issued

11.b. When was the Program/Project Manager Assigned?

2008-05-01

11.c. What date did the Program/Project Manager receive the FACP/PM certification? If the certification has not been issued, what is the anticipated date for certification?

2009-07-31

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.

yes

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?

no

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)

no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?

yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives
Expanded E-Government

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)

MBD reduces decision time by automating:data sharing, dual-eligible deeming, and data integrity checks. Provides single internet interface to plans & Part D entities for both MBD & payment systems. Centralizes receipt of low income determinations from SSA/States, deems dual-eligible benes, ensures low income benes covered by PartD by auto-enrolling the non-covered into plans.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?

yes

14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?

yes

14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?

10001060 - Medicare

14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?

Moderately Effective

15. Is this investment for information technology?

yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?

Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?

no

19. Is this a financial management system?

no

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	0
Software	3
Services	97
Other	0

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?

no

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	Maribel Franey
Phone Number	410-786-0747
Title	Director, Division of Privacy Compliance Data Deve (EDG)
Email	maribel.franey@cms.hhs.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?

yes

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?

yes

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.

All amounts represent Budget Authority

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).

Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2007	PY 2008	CY 2009	BY 2010
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	21.800	21.784	31.184	20.083
Government FTE Cost	1.100	1.000	1.020	1.040
# of FTEs	5	4	4	4

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?

no

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Productivity	Expand MBD to support the percentage of MMA Low Income Subsidy and Part D enrollment	MBD supports centralized beneficiary data and Drug Card enrollment functions	Low Income Subsidy support operational by 8/1; Auto-assignment operational by 8/30; Part D enrollment in testing by 9/15	100% complete
2	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Internal Data Sharing	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	100% complete
3	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	Implemented middleware to support query functions
4	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	48 Hours	36 Hours	36 hours
5	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	24 Hours	12 Hours	12 hours
6	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	90% availability	91% Availability	91% Availability
7	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	90%	92%	99%
8	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	12 Hours	4 Hours	21 Minutes
9	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	91%availability	93% Availability	92% Availability
10	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	System Maintenance	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	80% of partners	90% of partners	95% of partners
11	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
12	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	93% availability	97% Availability	TBD
13	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	92%	94%	TBD
14	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	90% of partners	95% of partners	TBD
15	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
16	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	97% Availability	99% Availability	TBD
17	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	94%	96%	TBD
18	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Data Archiving	75% increas	78% increase	TBD
19	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	3 Hours	2 hours	TBD
20	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	96%	97%	TBD
21	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	User Satisfaction	Reduce the number of problem reports to ensure customer satisfaction and support the agency mission	Achieve an 82% performance rating	Achieve an 84% performance rating	TBD
22	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Data Archiving	78% increase	82% increase	TBD
23	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	2 Hours	2 Hours	TBD
24	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	97%	98%	TBD
25	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	User Satisfaction	Reduce the number of problem reports to ensure customer satisfaction and support the agency mission	Achieve an 84% performance rating	Achieve an 86% performance rating	TBD
26	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Data Archiving	82% increase	85% increase	TBD
27	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	2 Hours	2 Hours	TBD
28	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	98%	98%	TBD
29	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	User Satisfaction	Reduce the number of problem reports to ensure customer satisfaction and support the agency mission	Achieve an 86% performance rating	Achieve an 88% performance rating	TBD
30	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	System Maintenance	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	18 Hours	17 Hours	TBD
31	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Percent increase in Data Archiving	95% increase	97% increase	TBD
32	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	2 Hours	1 Hour	TBD
33	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	98%	99%	TBD
34	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	User Satisfaction	Reduce the number of problem reports to ensure customer satisfaction and support the agency mission	Achieve an 88% performance rating	Achieve an 90% performance rating	TBD
35	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	95% of partners	97% of partners	TBD
36	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	97% increase	99% of partners	TBD
37	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Data Archiving	85% increase	88% increase	TBD
38	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Data Archiving	85% increase	88% increase	TBD
39	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	60%	50%	TBD
40	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	50%	40%	TBD
41	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	40%	30%	TBD
42	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	30%	20%	TBD
43	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	20%	10%	TBD
44	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	10%	5%	TBD

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?

yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.

CMS Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?

no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.

Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.

Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.

Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Reused Component Name	Reused UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	MBD Standardized / Canned Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of pre-conceived or pre-written reports.	Reporting	Standardized / Canned			No Reuse	9
2	MBD Data Warehouse Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the archiving and storage of large volumes of data.	Data Management	Data Warehouse			No Reuse	6
3	MBD Data Mart Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support a subset of a data warehouse for a single department or function within an organization.	Data Management	Data Mart			No Reuse	1
4	MBD Data Integration Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the organization of data from separate data sources into a single source using middleware or application integration and the modification of system data models to capture new information within a single system.	Development and Integration	Data Integration			No Reuse	10
5	MBD Quality Management Service	Defines the set of capabilities that help determine the level that a product or service satisfies certain requirements.	Management of Processes	Quality Management			No Reuse	1
6	MBD Identification and Authentication Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support obtaining information about those parties attempting to log on to a system or application for security purposes and the validation of those users.	Security Management	Identification and Authentication			No Reuse	1
7	MBD Extraction and Transformation Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the manipulation and change of data.	Data Management	Extraction and Transformation			No Reuse	7
8	MBD Process Tracking Service	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the monitoring of activities within the business cycle.	Tracking and Workflow	Process Tracking			No Reuse	2
9	MBD Audit Trail Capture and Analysis Service	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis - Support the identification and monitoring of activities within an application, system, or network.	Security Management	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis			No Reuse	5
10	MBD System Resource Monitoring Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the balance and allocation of memory, usage, disk space and performance on computers and their applications.	Systems Management	System Resource Monitoring			No Reuse	3
11	MBD Data Recovery Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the restoration and stabilization of data sets to a consistent, desired state.	Data Management	Data Recovery			No Reuse	5
12	MBD Graphing / Charting Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the presentation of information in the form of diagrams or tables.	Visualization	Graphing / Charting			No Reuse	4
13	MBD Data Exchange Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered.	Data Management	Data Exchange			No Reuse	6
14	MBD Access Control Service	Access Control - Support the management of permissions for logging onto a computer, application, service, or network; includes user management and role/privilege management.	Security Management	Access Control			No Reuse	8
15	MBD Loading and Archiving Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the population of a data source with external data.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving			No Reuse	8
16	MBD Ad Hoc Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of dynamic reports on an as needed basis.	Reporting	Ad Hoc			No Reuse	9
17	MBD Data Classification Service	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the classification of data.	Data Management	Data Classification			No Reuse	3
18	MBD Meta Data Management Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the maintenance and administration of data that describes data.	Data Management	Meta Data Management			No Reuse	3
19	MBD Data Cleansing Service	Defines the set of capabilities that support the removal of incorrect or unnecessary characters and data from a data source.	Data Management	Data Cleansing			No Reuse	8
20	MBD Configuration Management Service	Defines the set of capabilities that control the hardware and software environments, as well as documents of an organization.	Management of Processes	Configuration Management			No Reuse	1

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.

Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Standardized / Canned	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Microsoft Office Excel by: Microsoft Corporation
2	Data Warehouse	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	IBM DB2 by: International Business Machines Corp.
3	Data Mart	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
4	Data Mart	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
5	Data Mart	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
6	Data Mart	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
7	Data Integration	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer by: Microsoft Corporation
8	Quality Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Test Management	Time Sharing Option by: International Business Machines Corp.
9	Identification and Authentication	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project by: Microsoft Corporation
10	Identification and Authentication	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
11	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
12	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
13	Extraction and Transformation	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer by: Minq Software AB
14	Extraction and Transformation	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
15	Process Tracking	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	IBM WebSphere MQ by: International Business Machines Corp.
16	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project by: Microsoft Corporation
18	System Resource Monitoring	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Office Access by: Microsoft Corporation
19	Data Recovery	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
20	Graphing / Charting	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Modeling	ERwin Data Modeler by: TBD
21	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	COBOL by: TBD
22	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
23	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
24	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
25	Access Control	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project by: Microsoft Corporation
26	Access Control	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
27	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
28	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
29	Loading and Archiving	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer by: Minq Software AB
30	Loading and Archiving	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
31	Ad Hoc	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Microsoft Office Excel by: Microsoft Corporation
32	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
33	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
34	Data Classification	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
35	Data Classification	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
36	Meta Data Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
37	Meta Data Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
38	Meta Data Management	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer by: Minq Software AB
39	Meta Data Management	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
40	Data Cleansing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL by: TBD
41	Data Cleansing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL by: TBD
42	Data Cleansing	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer by: Minq Software AB
43	Data Cleansing	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
44	Configuration Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	MKS Toolkit by: MKS Inc.

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?

no

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?

2008-03-20

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?

no

1. Was operational analysis conducted?

yes

1.a. If yes, provide the date the analysis was completed.

2008-08-05

What were the results of your operational analysis?

The MBD is meeting, and is expected to continue to meet projected milestones, and the MBD remains within a 10% variance for the planned O&M costs compared to actual O&M costs. We regularly meet with customers on developing expectations. Customers are and will continue to be involved in both refining metrics parameters, and in a feedback loop towards future performance and quality.

1.c. If no, please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future.

Not Applicable.