Exhibit 300 (BY2010) for Centers for Disease Control (CDC) CCID Vaccine Tracking System (VTrckS)

1. Date of Submission:

2009-04-10

2. Agency:

009

3. Bureau:

20

4. Name of this Capital Asset:

CDC CCID Vaccine Tracking System (VTrckS)

5. Unique Project Identifier:

009-20-01-03-01-0278-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2010?

Full-Acquisition

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?

FY2002

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.

The Vaccine Tracking System (VTrckS) is a critical component of the Vaccine Management Business Improvement Project (VMBIP), an HHS initiative to improve current vaccine management processes around public purchased vaccine at the federal, state, and local levels. VTrckS will provide capabilities to allow the CDC to manage over $3 billion of vaccines associated with the Vaccines for Children (VFC) and Section 317 grantee funded programs. It is an enterprise system that will replace several legacy systems used by CDC and state/local grantees immunization grantees. The business of vaccine purchase, ordering, inventory management, and distribution has evolved significantly since the VFC program began in 1994, necessitating changes and enhancements to the IT systems and processes currently being used to support the program. VTrckS will significantly improve and enhance operations in the following areas: 1) more efficient management of CDC's vaccine purchase contracts, in terms of matching between vaccine orders, good receipts, and invoices and reconciliation of contract balances; 2) provision of a national, web-based vaccine ordering system that can be used directly by the tens of thousands of vaccine providers enrolled in the VFC program (this ordering is currently carried out by state and local immunization program on behalf of more than 40,000 immunization providers); 3) tools and automated processes for state immunization programs to manage provider vaccine orders within their jurisdictions; 4) improved internal efficiencies for CDC in terms of program management and oversight (e.g., provision of data to monitor distributor performance; grantee ordering trends; accountability, etc); and 5) an IT system to support a public health response for emergency situations in which widespread distribution of public purchased vaccine would be necessary, such as an influenza pandemic.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?

yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?

2008-07-11

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?

yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?

Waiver Issued

11.b. When was the Program/Project Manager Assigned?

2007-09-03

11.c. What date did the Program/Project Manager receive the FACP/PM certification? If the certification has not been issued, what is the anticipated date for certification?

2009-07-31

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.

yes

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?

yes

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)

no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?

yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Budget Performance Integration
Expanded E-Government
Financial Performance

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)

VTrckS will: support CDC's management of the Immunization Program and centralized distribution activities, by providing data that can be used to assess grantee and provider ordering patterns and accountability efforts; enable CDC to monitor vaccine purchase funds and will support grantees' vaccine budget monitoring; and provide electronic access to vaccine ordering to 40,000+ public and private immunization providers and allows grantees to electronically review and manage orders.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?

no

15. Is this investment for information technology?

yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?

Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?

no

19. Is this a financial management system?

no

19.a.2. If no, what does it address?

VTrcks supports direct provider ordering; grantee management of provider orders; information about vaccine inventory levels; and monitoring of CDC's vaccine contract purchases and balances.

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	3
Software	17
Services	70
Other	10

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?

n/a

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	Felicia Kittles
Phone Number	770.488.8919
Title	IT Security Project Manager
Email	ice8@cdc.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?

no

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?

no

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.

All amounts represent Budget Authority

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).

Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2007	PY 2008	CY 2009	BY 2010
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.560	0.160	0.125
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	15.578	7.050	17.800	13.926
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Government FTE Cost	0.540	0.240	0.340	0.720
# of FTEs	2	2	4	4

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?

no

3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.

VTrckS was re-basedlined in 12/2008 due to increase in scope and complexiity. This has also caused the project costs to increase. Estimates will increase for FY 2010- $26.6 (M), FY2011-$21.6(M), FY2012-$16.5(M), FY2013-$12.4 (M). Updates will be submitted to HHS and OMB during the Mid-Session Review.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2005	S.O. 3.2 - Protect the safety and foster the well-being of children and youth	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 4 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	5-7 business days to re-distribute vaccine from one coverage area to another
2	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 4 business days the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area
3	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by manufacturer	54.66M doses of vaccine shipped	95% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the manufacturers	99% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers
4	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	7 minutes to research account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to < 3 minutes per funding type	Decreased research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type
5	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4 work days to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle
6	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	2 Work days
7	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	1% of all vaccines ordered annually	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually
8	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of data is processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface
9	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	Reduce 54 grantee depot systems used for vaccine distribution	Reduce grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 10%	Reduced 54 grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 0%
10	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduced to 3 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area
11	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	95% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	91.5% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers and distributor
12	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 3 minutes per funding type	Decreased research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type
13	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle
14	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	2 Work days
15	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually
16	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrcKs processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface
17	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	Reduced 54 grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 0%	45% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots
18	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business days the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	4 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area
19	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	96% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers and distributor	96 of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers and distributor
20	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 2 minutes per funding type	Decreased research time to <2 min
21	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	3-5 workdays to complete the order shipment distribution cycle
22	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	2 Workdays
23	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	.059 rejected vaccines
24	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface
25	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	65% reduction in the number of vaccine depots in 2007	72% reduction in the number of vaccine depots
26	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
27	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
28	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to 1 minutes per funding type	N/A
29	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
30	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
31	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
32	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
33	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	85% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
34	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
35	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributorer as determined in 2009	N/A
36	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minute per funding type	N/A
37	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
38	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
39	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually in 2009	N/A
40	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
41	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	>=95% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
42	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
43	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
44	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minutes per funding type	N/A
45	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
46	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
47	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
48	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
49	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	>= 95% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
50	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
51	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
52	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minute per funding type	N/A
53	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
54	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor / manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
55	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
56	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
57	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	>= 95% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
58	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
59	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
60	2013	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minute per funding type	N/A

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?

yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.

CDC Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS)

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?

no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.

Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.

Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.

Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Reused Component Name	Reused UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Supply Chain Management	Ordering / Purchasing			No Reuse	5
2	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Customer Relationship Management	Contact and Profile Management			No Reuse	2
3	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Management of Processes	Quality Management			No Reuse	5
4	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Knowledge Management	Information Retrieval			No Reuse	5
5	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Business Intelligence	Demand Forecasting / Mgmt			No Reuse	5
6	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Help			No Reuse	2
7	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Business Intelligence	Decision Support and Planning			No Reuse	10
8	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Tracking and Workflow	Process Tracking			No Reuse	10
9	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving			No Reuse	5
10	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Tutorials			No Reuse	2
11	Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS) (278)	The system processes orders from immunization providers for vaccines using Federal funds. Orders are captured by PC software in state health departments, transmitted electronically to CDC, funds are obligated & orders are sent to vendors via EDI.	Investment Management	Strategic Planning and Mgmt			No Reuse	5

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.

Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Ordering / Purchasing	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
2	Contact and Profile Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
3	Quality Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
4	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Microsoft SQL Server by: Microsoft Corporation
5	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Dependent Platform	z/OS by: International Business Machines Corp.
6	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Visual FoxPro 9.0 by: Microsoft Corporation
7	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer 6.0 by: Microsoft Corporation
8	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	VeriSign SSL Certificates by: Verisign
9	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	User Presentation / Interface	Static Display	Hyper Text Markup Language by: International Organization for Standardization
10	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Microsoft Visual Basic .Net by: Microsoft Corporation
11	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Open Database Connectivity by: Microsoft Corporation
12	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
13	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Adabas by: Software AG
14	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	User Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Active Server Pages by: Microsoft Corporation
15	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T1 Carrier by: ANSI
16	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	HP ProLiant by: Hewlett-Packard Corporation
17	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Microsoft SQL Server 2005 by: Microsoft Corporation
18	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	Synchronous Optical Networking by: ANSI
19	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T3 Carrier by: ANSI
20	Demand Forecasting / Mgmt	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
21	Online Help	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer 6.0 by: Microsoft Corporation
22	Decision Support and Planning	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	Java by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
23	Process Tracking	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
24	Loading and Archiving	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
25	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 by: World Wide Web Consortium
26	Online Tutorials	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG
27	Strategic Planning and Mgmt	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	SAP Supply Chain Management by: SAP AG

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?

yes

6.a. If yes, please describe.

This system will align with the federal health architecture as it is defined.

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?

2008-07-30

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?

yes

1.c. If yes, describe any significant changes:

The risk management plan has been updated to include the work for the configuration of the replacement COTS system during the technology refresh of VTrckS.

3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:

Risk are mostly transferred to the vendor through use of a fixed price contract and mitigated in their operations, though room has been left in the investment schedule to incorporate any timing delays.

1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?

no

2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?

no

3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?

yes

3.a. If yes, when was it approved by the agency head?

2008-12-05