Exhibit 300 (BY2010) - Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service (OCSE)

PART ONE

OVERVIEW

1. Date of Submission:: 2009-04-10

2. Agency:: 009

3. Bureau:: 70

4. Name of this Capital Asset:: ACF Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service (OCSE)

5. Unique Project Identifier:: 009-70-01-04-01-1000-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2010?: Mixed Life Cycle

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?: FY2001 or earlier

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.: FPLS consists of 2 key components: National Directory of New Hires (NDNH), a database of employment data & Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders (FCR), a database of child support cases & orders. FPLS is crucial to helping OCSE fulfill its mission in assisting States to secure the financial support upon which millions of our nation's children depend & has contributed to an increase in the overall effectiveness & performance of the child support program. NDNH data matches resulted in national child support collections of about $516M in FY08. In TY08, the FPLS Federal Offset Program collected $2.85B. The FPLS Passport Denial Program resulted in denial of about 80 passports daily & $40.7M in lump sum payments in CY07. FPLS supports & is aligned with HHS, ACF & OCSE goals & initiatives. Without the FPLS, the program would not be able to accomplish its mission & provide its services. FPLS eliminates traditional barriers between government agencies & promotes data sharing to improve program efficiencies & customer service. State & local CSE agencies use FPLS data to locate noncustodial parents who are delinquent in child support payments & to increase collections. States rely on FPLS to facilitate standardized & centralized communication & data exchanges with employers, multistate financial institutions & other Federal agencies. FPLS data are also used to reduce erroneous payments & overall program costs in Public Assistance & Benefit Programs. FPLS actively supports the PMA by providing authorized programs a centralized source of employment & location data, as well as the One Government initiative through a strong partnership between OCSE & SSA by relying on a consolidated infrastructure, leveraging IT resources & experience, & promoting data exchange efficiencies & program integration. In FY06 SSA estimated benefits of NDNH matching of about $50.4M in prevention of future overpayments & adjustments of incorrect payment amounts in the Supplemental Security Income program. In CY06, IRS used a combination of FCR & other data to recover over $376M in additional taxes owed. In FY07, NDNH data helped Dept of ED recover $1.1B in defaulted student loans. HUD estimated the subsidy error in FY06 for HUD's rental housing assistance programs identified using NDNH data to be about $387M. In CY07, DOL estimated benefits of NDNH & SDNH matching to be about $120M, which includes identification, recovery, and prevention of Unemployment Insurance benefit overpayments.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?: yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?: 2009-03-26

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?: yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?: Waiver Issued

11.b. When was the Program/Project Manager Assigned?: 2003-05-01

11.c. What date did the Program/Project Manager receive the FACP/PM certification? If the certification has not been issued, what is the anticipated date for certification?: 2009-07-31

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.: no

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?: no

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only): no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?: yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives
Budget Performance Integration
Competitive Sourcing
Eliminating Improper Payments
Expanded E-Government
Housing and Urban Development Management and Performance
Human Capital

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?): ELIMINATE IMPROPER PAYMENTS & HUD MGMT: Assists in generating about $2B in savings & revenue in State & Fed programs (incl HUD) by preventing & recouping improper payments & collecting gov't debt. Promotes EXPANDED E-GOV at Fed & State levels via electronic transmission of employment & child support data & real-time access to child support case & financial data & promoting EFT/EDI. Supports COMPETITIVE SOURCING thru performance-based contracts. See Overview Q.8, Performance & Acq Strat Sections.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?: yes

14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?: yes

14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?: 10001054 - Office of Child Support Enforcement

14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?: Effective

15. Is this investment for information technology?: yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?: Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance): (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?: no

19. Is this a financial management system?: no

19.a.2. If no, what does it address?: FPLS, a legislatively mandated investment, consists of 2 key components: National Directory of New Hires (NDNH), a database of employment data & Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders (FCR), a database of child support cases & orders. FPLS is crucial to the OCSE mission in assisting States to secure the financial support upon which millions of our nation's children depend & has contributed to an increase in the overall effectiveness & performance of the child support program.

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	3
Software	2
Services	77
Other	18

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?: n/a

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	David Jenkins
Phone Number	202-690-5802
Title	Director, Division of Operations
Email	david.jenkins@acf.hhs.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?: yes

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?: no

SUMMARY OF SPEND

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report. All amounts represent Budget Authority Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2007	PY 2008	CY 2009	BY 2010
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.842	0.000	0.378	0.378
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	3.878	1.795	0.853	1.741
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	46.183	18.260	17.720	20.200
Government FTE Cost	6.909	2.537	6.643	7.373
# of FTEs	48	16	30	30

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?: no

3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.: Budget estimates for FY2010 through FY2014 have been updated to reflect the revised FPLS Alternatives Analysis that was approved on March 20, 2008. These cost estimates are based on proposed future contracts and interagency agreements that will be awarded beginning in FY2009. The estimated # of FTEs varies from year to year due to SSA resources being used to support the FPLS. Under the current summary, the number of HHS/ACF FTEs (16)remains constant across all fiscal years.

PERFORMANCE

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2007: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2007: 125:1
2	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2008: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2008: 177:1
3	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2009: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2009: TBD
4	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2010: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2010: TBD
5	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2011: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2011: TBD
6	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2012: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2012: TBD
7	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2013: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2013: TBD
8	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio (Annual FPLS-attributable Child Support collections to IT dollars spent).	FY2006 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 126:1	FY2014: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1	FY2014: TBD
9	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2007: $2.191 Billion (includes increased collections from garnishments of SSA benefits that have been recorded since July 2007)	FY2007: $2.465 Billion
10	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2008: $2.853 Billion	FY2008: $3.994 Billion
11	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2009: $2.867 Billion	FY2009: TBD
12	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2010: $2.881 Billion	FY2010: TBD
13	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2011: $2.896 Billion	FY2011: TBD
14	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2012: $2.910 Billion	FY2012: TBD
15	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2013: $2.925 Billion	FY2013: TBD
16	2014	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Social Services	Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, SSA Garnishments and NDNH-Attributable Collections).	FY2006 FPLS attributable collections: $2.180 Billion	0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2014: $2.939 Billion	FY2014: TBD
17	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Percent increase in number of NDNH locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching.	FY2006: 4.6% increase from previous year in NDNH locate data available for matching	FY2007: 1% increase from previous year.	FY2007: 6.4% increase from previous year.
18	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Percent increase in number of NDNH locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching.	FY2006: 4.6% increase from previous year in NDNH locate data available for matching	FY2008: 1% increase from previous year.	FY2008: 3.3% increase from previous year.
19	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2007: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.
20	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2008: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.
21	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2009: TBD
22	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2010: TBD
23	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2011: TBD
24	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2012: TBD
25	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2013: TBD
26	2014	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Availability	Number of FPLS data processing and system availability standards that are met in all four quarters of a fiscal year.	FY2006: 9 of 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards met in all 4 quarters.	Continue to meet all 9 FPLS data processing and system availability standards in all 4 quarters.	FY2014: TBD
27	2007	S.O. 3.4 - Address the needs, strengths and abilities of vulnerable populations	Customer Results	Access	Number of legislatively authorized State and Federal Agencies for which data matches have been implemented to support government-wide cost savings.	FY2006: Conducted data matches with 56 State and Federal Agencies.	Increase number of State and Federal Agencies successfully matching with FPLS data to 57 in FY2007	FY2007: 68 State and Federal Agencies matching with FPLS data.
28	2008	S.O. 3.4 - Address the needs, strengths and abilities of vulnerable populations	Customer Results	Access	Number of legislatively authorized State and Federal Agencies for which data matches have been implemented to support government-wide cost savings.	FY2006: Conducted data matches with 56 State and Federal Agencies.	Increase number of State and Federal Agencies successfully matching with FPLS data to 70 in FY2008	FY2008: 79 State and Federal Agencies matching with FPLS data.
29	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Security	Number of States conducting Secure FTP pilot by September 2007.	0 States using Secure FTP in FY2006.	Conduct 2 State pilots of Secure FTP in FY2007	FY2007: 1 State and 1 employer piloting Secure FTP.
30	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct network for interstate communication.	FY2007 - 0 States using C:D	Increase number of States Using C:D network to 15 by Sept. 2008	FY2008: 0 States using C:D; migration postponed.
31	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct network for interstate communication.	FY2007 - 0 States using C:D	Increase number of States Using C:D network to 30 by Sept. 2009	FY2009: TBD
32	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct network for interstate communication.	FY2007 - 0 States using C:D	Increase number of States Using C:D network to 45 by Sept. 2010	FY2010: TBD
33	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct network for interstate communication.	FY2007 - 0 States using C:D	Increase number of States Using C:D network to 54 by Sept. 2011	FY2011: TBD
34	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2008: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2008: 16.2% increase from previous year.
35	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2009: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2009: TBD
36	2010	S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2010: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2010: TBD
37	2011	S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2011: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2011: TBD
38	2012	S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2012: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2012: TBD
39	2013	S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2013: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2013: TBD
40	2014	S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage	Technology	External Data Sharing	Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States.	FY2007: 19.0 million total FPLS locate and asset records sent to States.	FY2014: 0.5% increase in locate and asset information sent to States.	FY2014: TBD
41	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2008: 10% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2008: 28.1% increase from previous year.
42	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2009: 10% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2009: TBD
43	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2010: 5% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2010: TBD
44	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2011: 5% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2011: TBD
45	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2012: 2% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2012: TBD
46	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2013: 2% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2013: TBD
47	2014	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Service Efficiency	Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically.	FY2007: 19,732 e-IWOs sent to 1 Federal Employer.	FY2014: 2% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers.	FY2014: TBD
48	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States and Employer with access to e-IWO portal for data exchange.	FY2007: 12 States and 19 National Employers using e-IWO.	FY2008: Increase number of e-IWO users to 17 States and 24 National Employers.	FY2008: 13 States and 19 Employers
49	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of States and Employer with access to e-IWO portal for data exchange.	FY2007: 12 States and 19 National Employers using e-IWO.	FY2009: Increase number of e-IWO users to 20 States and 29 National Employers.	FY2009: TBD
50	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Access	Percent increase in number of data exchange agreements between States to increase interstate communication.	FY2007: 13,934 data exchange agreements between States.	FY2008: 10% increase in number of interstate data exchange agreements.	FY2008: 10.6% increase from previous year.
51	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Access	Percent increase in number of data exchange agreements between States to increase interstate communication.	FY2007: 13,934 data exchange agreements between States.	FY2009: 5% increase in number of interstate data exchange agreements.	FY2009: TBD
52	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Access	Percent increase in number of data exchange agreements between States to increase interstate communication.	FY2007: 13,934 data exchange agreements between States.	FY2010: 2% increase in number of interstate data exchange agreements.	FY2010: TBD
53	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Access	Number of States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2007: 6 States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2008: 12 States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2008: 11 States
54	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Access	Number of States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2007: 6 States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2009: 22 States exchanging Child Support data through QUICK.	FY2009: TBD

Enterprise Architecture

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?: yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?: yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.: ACF Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?: no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/. Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM. Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission. Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government. Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Electronic Income Withholding Order	The Electronic Income Withholding Order provides a facility and processes for brokering electronic income withholding orders between State Child Support Enforcement agencies and employer organizations.	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	1
2	Management Information Central Repository System	The Management Information Central Repository System consists of a central relational database and set of reporting interfaces designed to provide access to FPLS and OCSE system and program performance management information.	Reporting	Standardized / Canned	No Reuse	1
3	Electronic Data Exchange - QUICK	Enabling electronic data exchange	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	1
4	Interstate Case Reconciliation	The ICR system facilitates the reconciliation of interstate cases and their date elements by state CSE agencies.	Records Management	Record Linking / Association	No Reuse	0
5	Federal Offset System	The FOS system provides the States/territories with an interface to MSFIDM and to the Treasury's Financial Management System (FMS), the Program Support Center (PSC) and the Department of State (DoS). The system maintains and routes information regarding delinquent child support obligor's to these agencies on behalf of the States/territories. The FMS interfaces effectuate an offset of the tax return or administrative payments being made to an obligor and routes the results of the offset	Routing and Scheduling	Inbound Correspondence Management	No Reuse	6
6	Insurance Match	The Insurance Match system provides the Office of Child Support Enforcement the ability to offer insurers a matching interface and lookup facility in order to identify payments that could be offset for child support obligations.	Search	Query	No Reuse	1
7	Child Support Enforcement Network	CSENet receives, edits and routes valid transactions between States. The application acts as a hub to support the exchange between States of detailed information that is needed for interstate cases processing. It tracks the status of State agreements to exchange data and routes data according to the agreements. CSENet 2000 transactions are routed via the OCSENet	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	7
8	Interstate Referral Guide	The IRG provides child support case processing information from the 54 states and territories to increase the efficiency of interstate case processing	Knowledge Management	Information Sharing	No Reuse	3
9	Multistate Financial Institution Data Match	MSFIDM utilizes the FOP System Case Master File to identify delinquent obligors that are eligible for account matching with financial institutions that operate in multiple states. (i.e., MSFIs). A quarterly inquiry file is sent to the MSFIs for the eligible obligors. The MSFI application receives and edits the MSFI response data. Accepted data is sent to the States/territories via the FCR. Processing statistics are downloaded to the Multi-State Financial Institution Media Tracking Syst	Search	Query	No Reuse	1
10	Federal Case Registry	The FCR serves as a national repository of pointer information for the child support cases from all 50 States and four territories. It accepts child support case updates (includes new case/participants, changes and deletes) and Locate Requests from the States via CONNECT:Direct for daily batch processing. The FCR interfaces daily with the NDNH to proactively match FCR participants and respond to Locate Requests. It accepts MSFIDM matches from the MSFIDM process and routes the responses	Search	Query	No Reuse	29
11	QUICK	QUICK is enables states to electronically exchange financial and basic interstate CSE case information via an OCSE website and/or web service. Other types of data, including case action and support order information, are being considered for future phases of the QUICK project	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	2
12	National Directory of New Hires	The NDNH is a national repository of employment information. It accepts W-4 and Quarterly Wage (QW) information from States, territories and Federal agencies. From States and territories it also receives Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefit information. The application interfaces with the FCR and FPLS legacy system. It also supports access and matching of NDNH data with authorized Federal and State agencies.	Records Management	Record Linking / Association	No Reuse	43
13	Multistate Employer Registry	MSER collects registration information that is received from multi-state employers. Employers may enter the information using the application's web interface or mail/fax the information to the Multi-State Employer Registration Help Desk. The Help Desk enters the data and audits web submissions via an MS Access GUI interface.	Knowledge Management	Information Sharing	No Reuse	1

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment. FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications. Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	Java by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
2	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	Border Gateway Protocol by: Cisco Systems, Inc.
3	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	SSH File Transfer Protocol by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
4	Data Exchange	Component Framework	User Presentation / Interface	Static Display	Hyper Text Markup Language by: International Organization for Standardization
5	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Types / Validation	XML Schema by: World Wide Web Consortium
6	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	36 CFR Part 1194 by: United States Access Board
7	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Eclipse by: Eclipse Foundation
8	Standardized / Canned	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	Lightweight Directory Access Protocol by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
9	Standardized / Canned	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Oracle Database 10g Release 2 Enterprise Edition by: Oracle Corporation
10	Standardized / Canned	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Dependent Technologies	PL/SQL by: Oracle Corporation
11	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	Hypertext Transfer Protocol with SSL by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
12	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	Lightweight Directory Access Protocol by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
13	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	SOAP by: World Wide Web Consortium
14	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Web Services Security (WS-Security) by: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards
15	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) by: World Wide Web Consortium
16	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interface	Service Description / Interface	Web Services Description Language (WSDL) by: World Wide Web Consortium
17	Record Linking / Association	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Virtual Storage Access Method version 1.6 by: International Business Machines Corp.
18	Record Linking / Association	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Internet	Connect:Direct by: Sterling Commerce
19	Record Linking / Association	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Dependent Platform	z/OS by: International Business Machines Corp.
20	Record Linking / Association	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	COBOL Version 3 by: International Business Machines Corp.
21	Record Linking / Association	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	IBM zSeries by: International Business Machines Corp.
22	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Virtual Storage Access Method version 1.6 by: International Business Machines Corp.
23	Inbound Correspondence Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	COBOL Version 3 by: International Business Machines Corp.
24	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Internet	Connect:Direct by: Sterling Commerce
25	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Dependent Platform	z/OS by: International Business Machines Corp.
26	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe by: CA, Inc.
27	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	IBM zSeries by: International Business Machines Corp.
28	Inbound Correspondence Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service by: ANSI
29	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service by: ANSI
30	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Storage	Hierarchical File System by: International Business Machines Corp.
31	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
32	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Dependent Platform	Unix System Services by: International Business Machines Corp.
33	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	File Transfer Protocol (FTP) by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
34	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Storage	Hierarchical File System by: International Business Machines Corp.
35	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	TCP/IP by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
36	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe by: CA, Inc.
37	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	Apache Ant by: Apache Software Foundation
38	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
39	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	IBM zSeries by: International Business Machines Corp.
40	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service by: ANSI
41	Information Sharing	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	JavaScript by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
42	Information Sharing	Component Framework	User Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	XHTML 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language by: World Wide Web Consortium
43	Query	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Resource Access Control Facility by: International Business Machines Corp.
44	Query	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Internet	Connect:Direct by: Sterling Commerce
45	Query	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent Technologies	COBOL Version 3 by: International Business Machines Corp.
46	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Virtual Storage Access Method version 1.6 by: International Business Machines Corp.
47	Query	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	Internet Protocol v4 by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
48	Query	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Service Transport	TCP/IP by: The Internet Engineering Task Force
49	Query	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	IBM DB2 Enterprise Server Edition 8 by: International Business Machines Corp.
50	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 by: Novell, Inc.
51	Data Exchange	Component Framework	User Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Java Server Pages by: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
52	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	XMLSpy by: Altova
53	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Web Servers	Apache HTTP Server by: Apache Software Foundation
54	Data Exchange	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Application Servers	Apache Tomcat by: Apache Software Foundation
55	Record Linking / Association	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe by: CA, Inc.
56	Information Sharing	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Web Servers	Apache HTTP Server by: Apache Software Foundation
57	Information Sharing	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	MySQL by: MySQL AB
58	Information Sharing	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer 6.0 by: Microsoft Corporation
59	Information Sharing	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Delivery Servers	Application Servers	Apache Tomcat by: Apache Software Foundation

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?: yes

6.a. If yes, please describe.: The FPLS facilitates horizontal (cross-Federal) and vertical (Federal, State and local government) integration of IT resources and establishes a line of sight contribution for the IT resources to support the mission and program performance. The FPLS leverages existing Federal agency components (SSA's National Computer Center, Financial Management Service Debt Collection, National Institutes of Health Program Support Center) to support its deliveries of service. Since 1996, OCSE has maintained a strong working relationship with SSA founded in the two agencies' common legislative and business needs; as a result, the two agencies have successfully shared data and processes across agencies. Specifically, OCSE uses the SSA National Computer Center to house the FPLS, using SSA information and applications to improve the quality of its data. In turn, based on legislative authority, SSA uses the National Director of New Hires (NDNH) data for multiple purposes resulting in significant savings and cost avoidance to SSA programs. The FPLS leverages existing Federal agency components to support its deliveries of service. In addition to data center support, FPLS leverages: the SSANet for batch file exchanges; the SSA Government Services Online operation for batch file exchanges via Internet; the SSA SVES for benefit information and the SSA SSN verification routines. The FPLS also leverages the FMS TOPS Program for offset of Federal payments for outstanding debts, and PSC capabilities for the transfer of funds from FMS to States. On an annual basis, OCSE, as a part of its operations and maintenance of existing business applications, assesses the viability and usefulness of the application components. Decisions to enhance and modernize the applications are based on the impact assessment of changing requirements and related evaluations of solutions that leverage resources across government organizations and are consistent with the FEA.

PART TWO

RISK

You should perform a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of the investment's life-cycle, develop a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks.

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?: yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?: 2008-03-24

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?: no

1.c. If yes, describe any significant changes:: Since project start-up, the FPLS Risk Management Plan has been, and will be, reviewed by FPLS project managers on an annual basis; both processes and responsible parties have been, and will be, updated as appropriate.

2.b. If no, what is the strategy for managing the risks?: Not applicable.

3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:: In order to address and quantify the various risks of the alternatives under consideration, sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the effects on total costs and benefits based on changes in individual component cost variables. The results were used to risk-adjust cost and schedule estimates for the projected lifecycle of the FPLS investment under the selected alternative. These analyses were also considered when determining the final risk-adjusted return for each alternative. Cost and benefit estimates were derived using current contract prices for similar work, and current benefit statistics reported by OCSE. In addition, each alternative was measured for mission, schedule, security, risk, and enterprise compliance. Contracts are structured into modules or segments, each with unique deliverables and incentives and with progress reported using an earned value approach. Each individual project has its project plan, cost, and schedule approved by OCSE's Strategic Planning and Oversight Board. These costs and schedules are risk-adjusted using the risks identified during the economic sensitivity analysis, and any new risk that may affect cost and schedule are discussed and incorporated before approval to proceed is granted. Using this approach to contracting, the Government assumes minimal risk for achievement of cost, schedule and performance goals.

COST & SCHEDULE

1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?: yes

2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?: no

3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?: yes

3.a. If yes, when was it approved by the agency head?: 2009-03-26