Exhibit 300 (BY2009) for FDA Financial Enterprise Solutions (FES)
PART ONE
OVERVIEW
- 1. Date of Submission:
- 2008-02-04
- 2. Agency:
- 009
- 3. Bureau:
- 10
- 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
- FDA Financial Enterprise Solutions (FES) (FY09)
- 5. Unique Project Identifier:
- 009-10-01-01-01-7068-00
- 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?
- Mixed Life Cycle
- 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
- FY2005
- 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.
- MISSION SUPPORT: DHHS and FDA missions depend upon efficient and effective use of public funds. Financial management ensures control and accounting of public funds, enforces administrative spending controls and standardizes transactions. FES integrates with the HHS Unified Financial Management System (UFMS) and supports over 10,000 FDA employees. FES is Mission Critical. PART remediation and financial performance gaps addressed are: Improve Financial Performance - FES ensures that allocated public funds support the FDA mission with fiduciary integrity in compliance with applicable laws, accounting standards and federal guidelines through administrative spending controls while reducing costs and improving efficiency of financial management processes. Process automation replaces or eliminates many manual tasks. Eliminate redundancies and increase collaboration - FDA 2002 & 2003 eGovernment strategy reviews identified duplicate IT systems in FDA Centers. Example: National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) had a Contracts and Procurement Support System (CAPSS) to generate task orders and delivery orders similar to FES PRISM. Other Centers had duplicate manual processes for the same purpose. Use of FES PRISM as a standard procurement document generator and workflow manager eliminated redundancies and fostered collaboration across Centers. Bring Technology to Bear to Improve Services to Citizens - Financial systems are enablers for delivery of Services to Citizens. Example: FES PRISM provides faster, less costly automated processing of procurement orders for medical research supplies critical to public health research. HHS UFMS supports the production of financial statements and financial reporting. FES works with UFMS bringing technology to bear in financial systems that enable and, ultimately, result in improved health-related services to citizens. GOAL SUPPORT: FES reduced requirements for an estimated 22 full-time staff and supports the DHHS Strategic Goal to Achieve Excellence in Management Practices, the FDA Strategic Goal - A Strong FDA, and Outcome Goal - Reduce administrative overhead by reducing the number of administrative staff. Currently development (Financial Reporting, User Fees) and maintenance (AMS, Financial Reporting, PRISM) projects managed by the FDA Office of Financial Management (OFM) are included. FDA funding for HHS global financial IT are not funded by FES.
- 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
- yes
- 9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?
- 2007-06-23
- 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
- yes
- 11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?
- Senior/Expert-level
- 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.
- yes
- 12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?
- yes
- 12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)
- no
- 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?
- yes
- If yes, select the initiatives that apply:
Initiative Name Financial Performance
- 13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)
- FES provides FDA organizations with financial controls, oversight, management and reporting. FES aligns with the Financial Performance initiative by integrating financial data with performance information, improving the quality and timeliness of Federal financial data and providing summary financial data that is auditable at the transaction level for FDA. Through FES, FDA has received clean audit opinions for seven years and zero reportable material weaknesses in financial reporting to HHS.
- 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?
- yes
- 14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?
- no
- 14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?
- 2005: FDA - Overall FDA
- 14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?
- Moderately Effective
- 15. Is this investment for information technology?
- yes
- 16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?
- Level 2
- 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)
- (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment
- 18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?
- no
- 19. Is this a financial management system?
- yes
- 19.a. If yes, does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?
- yes
- 19.a.1. If yes, which compliance area:
- Financial Systems and Processes
- 19.b. If yes, please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A11 section 52.
- Financial Enterprise Solutions (FES)
- 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)
Area Percentage Hardware 0 Software 13 Services 70 Other 17
- 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
- n/a
- 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.
Name Betty Dorsey Phone Number 301 827 6567 Title FDA Privacy Act Officer Email betty.dorsey@fda.hhs.gov
- 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?
- yes
- 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?
- no
SUMMARY OF SPEND
- 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
All amounts represent Budget Authority
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented. Cost Type Py-1 & Earlier
-2006PY
2007CY
2008BY
2009Planning Budgetary Resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Acquisition Budgetary Resources 4.756 3.474 0.150 0.000 Maintenance Budgetary Resources 42.038 12.989 7.925 5.559 Government FTE Cost 9.676 0.752 0.593 0.463 # of FTEs 4 4 4 4
- 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?
- no
- 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
- Additions of approved DME activities and shifts in planned work to earlier fiscal periods for the FDA Financial Enterprise Solutions (FES), Major IT investment have resulted in changes to the investment phase from Steady State to Mixed-Life Cycle for FY2007 and FY2008. Changes are documented in a pending rebaseline request with approval expected in August 2007 and result in the following updates to spending plans for the investment: FY2007 increased spending of 52% ($ 5.897M) . FY2008 decreased spending of 15% ($ 1.567M). FY2009 decreased spending of 48% ($ 5.638M).
PERFORMANCE
- Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.
Row Fiscal Year Strategic Goal Supported Measurement Area Measurement Grouping Measurement Indicator Baseline Planned Improvement to the Baseline Actual Results 1 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 0 2 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 80 78 3 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness qualifiers resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 0 4 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 - prior to UFMS deployment on April 25, 2005 -2 0 5 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 0 estimated as of 7/31/2007 6 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 82 79 estimated as of 7/31/2007 7 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 0 estimated as of 7/31/2007 8 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -2 -5 estimated as of 7/31/2007 9 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 10 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 81 TBD at end of the period. 11 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 12 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -3 TBD at end of the period. 13 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 14 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 83 TBD at end of the period. 15 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 16 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -4 TBD at end of the period. 17 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 18 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 84 TBD at end of the period. 19 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 20 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -5 TBD at end of the period. 21 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 22 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 85 TBD at end of the period. 23 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 24 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -6 TBD at end of the period. 25 2012 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 26 2012 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 86 TBD at end of the period. 27 2012 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 28 2012 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -7 TBD at end of the period. 29 2013 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Mission and Business Results Reporting and Information Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 30 2013 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Customer Results Customer Satisfaction % user fee customer satisfaction with online service 75 87 TBD at end of the period. 31 2013 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Processes and Activities Financial Management Number of weakness citations (qualified opinions) resulting from annual external audit of FDA finanical books. 0 0 TBD at end of the period. 32 2013 Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources Technology Overall Costs % decrease in FDA financial transaction IT unit costs 0 -8 TBD at end of the period.
Enterprise Architecture
- 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
- yes
- 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
- yes
- 2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
- FDA Financial Enterprise Solutions
- 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?
- no
- 4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.
Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service. Row Agency Component Name Agency Component Description Service Type Component Reused Component Name Reused UPI Internal or External Reuse? Funding % 1 Activity-Based Management Defines the set of capabilities that support a defined, specific set of finance-related tasks for a given objective. Financial Management Activity-Based Management No Reuse 5 2 Expense Management Defines the set of capabilities that support the management and reimbursement of costs paid by employees or an organization. Financial Management Expense Management No Reuse 25 3 Billing and Accounting Defines the set of capabilities that support the charging, collection and reporting of an organization's accounts. Financial Management Billing and Accounting No Reuse 25 4 Revenue Management Defines the set of capabilities that support the allocation and re-investment of earned net credit or capital within an organization. Financial Management Revenue Management No Reuse 5 5 Auditing Defines the set of capabilities that support the examination and verification of records for accuracy. Financial Management Auditing No Reuse 15 6 Internal Controls Support the methods and procedures used by the organization to safeguard its assets, produce accurate accounting data and reports, contribute to efficient operations, and encourage staff to adhere to management policies and mission requirements Financial Management Internal Controls No Reuse 25
- 5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.
FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.
Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. Row SRM Component >Service Area Service Category Service Standard Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) 1 Activity-Based Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Hosting Sun Microsystems 2 Activity-Based Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Legislative / Compliance Web Access 3 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Business Objects. 4 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis COBOL 5 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Compusearch 6 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Gelco 7 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Hyperion 8 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Oracle 9 Activity-Based Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis PeopleSoft 10 Auditing Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Sun Servers 11 Auditing Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Cisco Servers 12 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Business Objects 13 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis COBOL 14 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Compusearch 15 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Gelco 16 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Hyperion 17 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Oracle 18 Auditing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis PeopleSoft 19 Billing and Accounting Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Oracle Financials 9i 20 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent PeopleSoft 21 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Business Objects 22 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis COBOL 23 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Compusearch 24 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Gelco 25 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Hyperion 26 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Oracle 27 Billing and Accounting Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis PeopleSoft 28 Expense Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Web Browser MS Internet Explorer 29 Expense Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Other Electronic Channels Ethernet LAN 30 Expense Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Other Electronic Channels PointSec 31 Expense Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Hosting Sun Microsystems 32 Expense Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Sun Servers 33 Expense Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Cisco Servers 34 Internal Controls Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Oracle Financials 9i 35 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Web Browser MS Internet Explorer 36 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications Blackberry 37 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications Email 38 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Delivery Channels Internet Wireless Cards 39 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Delivery Channels Intranet Blackberry 40 Internal Controls Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Hosting Sun Microsystems 41 Internal Controls Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Sun Servers 42 Internal Controls Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Cisco Servers 43 Revenue Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications Email 44 Revenue Management Service Access and Delivery Delivery Channels Internet Wireless Cards 45 Revenue Management Service Access and Delivery Delivery Channels Intranet Blackberry 46 Revenue Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Hosting Sun Microsystems 47 Revenue Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Sun Servers 48 Revenue Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Cisco Servers
- 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?
- no
PART TWO
RISK
Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks.
- 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
- yes
- 1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?
- 2007-06-30
- 1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?
- no
- 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
- Investment risks and opportunity impacts were quantified by multiplying probability of occurence times the project cost impacts in terms of dollars. The resulting factors were used in cost estimates and schedules for the related work breakdown structure elements. As a result, both potential negative risks impacts as well as likely opportunities for improvements have been factored into both investment costs and scheduled.
COST & SCHEDULE
- 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?
- yes
- 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?
- no
- 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?
- no





