Exhibit 300 (BY2009) - Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

PART ONE

OVERVIEW

1. Date of Submission:: 2008-02-04

2. Agency:: 009

3. Bureau:: 38

4. Name of this Capital Asset:: CMS Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

5. Unique Project Identifier:: 009-38-01-02-01-1150-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?: Operations and Maintenance

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?: FY2007

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.: This investment is for maintenance of the Medicare Beneficiary Database (MBD). The Medicare Beneficiary Database provides CMS with a singular, authoritative, database of comprehensive data on individuals in Medicare program to support ongoing and expanded program administration, service delivery modalities, and payment coverage options. This collection will contain a complete "beneficiary insurance profile" that reflects the individual's Medicare health insurance coverage and Medicare health plan and demonstration enrollment. This effort requires the integration and standardization of different types of beneficiary data that were previously fragmented and often redundant within isolated CMS legacy systems. Other agencies such as the states, RRB and SSA use MBD data to administer their programs. In addition, MBD data is relied upon by many federal oversight and law enforcement agencies, and hundreds of research projects sponsored by both federal and private research institutions. The MMA legislation significantly expanded the role of the MBD, as well as adding significant changes to the size and functions of the system. The MBD houses current and historical beneficiary data from 2000. MBD data includes beneficiary insurance profile data for over 60M beneficiary, who have been or are currently entitled to Medicare, are disabled and entitled to Medicare, or have End Stage Renal Disease. Maintenance supports continuity for the following fielded system functions: DATA SHARING-MBD centralizes the receipt and storage and protection of large quantities of data, manages entities accessing the data, and provides data to downstream systems. DUAL ELIGIBLES- MBD provides centralized receipt of low income determinations from SSA and the States, deems beneficiary that qualify as dual-eligible according to legislation, ensures low income beneficiaries are covered by identifying those that are uncovered and initiating an automated enrollment into a Plan, and provides critical information to the CMS areas responsible for coordinating the process with the beneficiary and the Plans. GUI/WUI-The MBD user interface provides beneficiary level data for CMS staff to respond to beneficiary issues. QUERY SERVICES-MBD provides online and batch views of Part D data to outside entities within the Part D network of systems.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?: yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?: 2007-06-26

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?: yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?: TBD

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.: yes

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?: no

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only): no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?: yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives
Expanded E-Government

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?): MBD reduces decision time by automating:data sharing, dual-eligible deeming, and data integrity checks. Provides single internet interface to plans & Part D entities for both MBD & payment systems. Centralizes receipt of low income determinations from SSA/States, deems dual-eligible benes, ensures low income benes covered by PartD by auto-enrolling the non-covered into plans.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?: yes

14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?: yes

14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?: 2003: CMS - Medicare Program

14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?: Moderately Effective

15. Is this investment for information technology?: yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?: Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance): (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?: no

19. Is this a financial management system?: no

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	1
Software	87
Services	1
Other	11

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?: no

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	Maribel Franey
Phone Number	410-786-0747
Title	Director, Division of Privacy Compliance Data Deve (EDG)
Email	maribel.franey@cms.hhs.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?: yes

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?: yes

SUMMARY OF SPEND

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report. All amounts represent Budget Authority Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2006	PY 2007	CY 2008	BY 2009
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	40.587	21.800	22.684	31.184
Government FTE Cost	4.000	1.100	1.100	1.150
# of FTEs	10	5	4	4

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?: no

PERFORMANCE

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Productivity	Expand MBD to support the percentage of MMA Low Income Subsidy and Part D enrollment	MBD supports centralized beneficiary data and Drug Card enrollment functions	Low Income Subsidy support operational by 8/1; Auto-assignment operational by 8/30; Part D enrollment in testing by 9/15	100% complete
2	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Internal Data Sharing	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	100% complete
3	2006	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	Implemented middleware to support query functions
4	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	48 Hours	36 Hours	TBD
5	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	24 Hours	12 Hours	TBD
6	2007	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	90% availability	91% Availability	TBD
7	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	36 Hours	24 Hours	TBD
8	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	12 Hours	4 Hours	TBD
9	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	91%availability	93% Availability	TBD
10	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	24 Hours	20 Hours	TBD
11	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
12	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	93% availability	95% Availability	TBD
13	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
14	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	95% Availability	97% Availability	TBD
15	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
16	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	97% Availability	98% Availability	TBD
17	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	4 Hours	3 Hours	TBD
18	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	98% Availability	98% Availability	TBD
19	2005	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Productivity	Expand MBD to support the percentage of MMA Low Income Subsidy and Part D enrollment	MBD supports centralized beneficiary data and Drug Card enrollment functions	Low Income Subsidy support operational by 8/1; Auto-assignment operational by 8/30; Part D enrollment in testing by 9/15	100% complete
20	2005	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	100% complete
21	2005	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Implement middleware to support number of on-line queries of beneficiary information, including 270/271 transactions and the ability of Customer Service Reps and Community Based Organizations to query MBD in real time	DA/DBA functions support over 400 CMS databases	Implement middleware to support query functions by 5/2005	Implemented middleware to support query functions
22	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	24 Hours	20 Hours	TBD
23	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	20 Hours	19 Hours	TBD
24	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	19 Hours	18 Hours	TBD
25	2008	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	System Maintenance	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	Implement 80% of partners	Implement with 90% of partners by 01/2009	TBD
26	2009	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Enhance user interfaces for internal, external and common medicare environment	Implement 80%	Implement 90%	TBD
27	2010	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Percent increase in Data Archiving	75% increase	85% increase	TBD
28	2011	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	System Maintenance	Attain and maintain consistency in beneficiary data provided to CMS partners	Implement 90% of partners	Implement with 95% of partners by 01/2011	TBD
29	2012	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Percent increase in Data Archiving	85% increase	95% increase	TBD
30	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction in latency time for responding to eligibility queries for entitlement data	18 Hours	17 Hours	TBD
31	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Mission and Business Results	Record Retention	Percent increase in Data Archiving	95% increase	97% increase	TBD
32	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Customer Results	Response Time	Time to respond to a 4Rx inquiry	3 Hours	2.5 Hours	TBD
33	2013	Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources	Technology	Accessibility	Average time the system is fully available to all system users during a 24 hour period (system uptime)	98% Availability	98.5% Availability	TBD

Enterprise Architecture

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?: yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?: yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.: CMS Data Management Operations - Beneficiary

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?: no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/. Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM. Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission. Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government. Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis - Support the identification and monitoring of activities within an application, system, or network.	Security Management	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	No Reuse	5
2	Identification and Authentication	Defines the set of capabilities that support obtaining information about those parties attempting to log on to a system or application for security purposes and the validation of those users.	Security Management	Identification and Authentication	No Reuse	1
3	Access Control	Access Control - Support the management of permissions for logging onto a computer, application, service, or network; includes user management and role/privilege management.	Security Management	Access Control	No Reuse	8
4	System Resource Monitoring	Defines the set of capabilities that support the balance and allocation of memory, usage, disk space and performance on computers and their applications.	Systems Management	System Resource Monitoring	No Reuse	3
5	Process Tracking	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the monitoring of activities within the business cycle.	Tracking and Workflow	Process Tracking	No Reuse	2
6	Standardized / Canned	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of pre-conceived or pre-written reports.	Reporting	Standardized / Canned	No Reuse	9
7	Ad Hoc	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of dynamic reports on an as needed basis.	Reporting	Ad Hoc	No Reuse	9
8	Graphing / Charting	Defines the set of capabilities that support the presentation of information in the form of diagrams or tables.	Visualization	Graphing / Charting	No Reuse	4
9	Data Warehouse	Defines the set of capabilities that support the archiving and storage of large volumes of data.	Data Management	Data Warehouse	No Reuse	6
10	Data Recovery	Defines the set of capabilities that support the restoration and stabilization of data sets to a consistent, desired state.	Data Management	Data Recovery	No Reuse	5
11	Data Classification	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the classification of data.	Data Management	Data Classification	No Reuse	3
12	Data Mart	Defines the set of capabilities that support a subset of a data warehouse for a single department or function within an organization.	Data Management	Data Mart	No Reuse	1
13	Data Cleansing	Defines the set of capabilities that support the removal of incorrect or unnecessary characters and data from a data source.	Data Management	Data Cleansing	No Reuse	8
14	Meta Data Management	Defines the set of capabilities that support the maintenance and administration of data that describes data.	Data Management	Meta Data Management	No Reuse	3
15	Extraction and Transformation	Defines the set of capabilities that support the manipulation and change of data.	Data Management	Extraction and Transformation	No Reuse	7
16	Loading and Archiving	Defines the set of capabilities that support the population of a data source with external data.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving	No Reuse	8
17	Data Exchange	Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered.	Data Management	Data Exchange	No Reuse	6
18	Data Integration	Defines the set of capabilities that support the organization of data from separate data sources into a single source using middleware or application integration and the modification of system data models to capture new information within a single system.	Development and Integration	Data Integration	No Reuse	10
19	Quality Management	Defines the set of capabilities that help determine the level that a product or service satisfies certain requirements.	Management of Processes	Quality Management	No Reuse	1
20	Configuration Management	Defines the set of capabilities that control the hardware and software environments, as well as documents of an organization.	Management of Processes	Configuration Management	No Reuse	1

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment. FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications. Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	COBOL
2	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
3	Data Mart	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
4	Meta Data Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
5	Data Cleansing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
6	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
7	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
8	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	COBOL
9	Data Exchange	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
10	Data Mart	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
11	Meta Data Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
12	Data Cleansing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
13	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
14	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
15	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	COBOL
16	Meta Data Management	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer
17	Data Cleansing	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer
18	Extraction and Transformation	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer
19	Loading and Archiving	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	DbVisualizer
20	Graphing / Charting	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Modeling	ERwin Data Modeler
21	Data Warehouse	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	IBM DB2
22	Data Recovery	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	IBM DB2
23	Process Tracking	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	IBM WebSphere MQ
24	Data Exchange	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
25	Data Mart	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
26	Meta Data Management	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
27	Data Cleansing	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
28	Extraction and Transformation	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
29	Loading and Archiving	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
30	Data Classification	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
31	Data Classification	Service Access and Delivery	Delivery Channels	Intranet	Java 2 Enterprise Edition
32	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity
33	Data Mart	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity
34	Data Classification	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java Database Connectivity
35	System Resource Monitoring	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Office Access
36	Ad Hoc	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Microsoft Office Excel
37	Standardized / Canned	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Microsoft Office Excel
38	Access Control	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project
39	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project
40	Identification and Authentication	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Microsoft Project
41	Configuration Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	MKS Toolkit
42	Access Control	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager
43	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager
44	Identification and Authentication	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Sun Identity Manager
45	Quality Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Test Management	Time Sharing Option
46	Data Integration	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer
47	Data Integration	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?: no

PART THREE

RISK

You should perform a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of the investment's life-cycle, develop a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks.

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?: yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?: 2007-03-22

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?: no

COST & SCHEDULE

1. Was operational analysis conducted?: no

1.a. If yes, provide the date the analysis was completed.: 2007-08-15

What were the results of your operational analysis?: The MBD is meeting, and is expected to continue to meet projected milestones, and the MBD remains within a 10% variance for the planned O&M costs compared to actual O&M costs. We regularly meet with customers on developing expectations. Customers are and will continue to be involved in both refining metrics parameters, and in a feedback loop towards future performance and quality.

1.c. If no, please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future.: Not Applicable.