Exhibit 300 (BY2009) for Centers for Disease Control (CDC) CCID Vaccine Tracking System (VTrckS)

1. Date of Submission:

2008-02-04

2. Agency:

009

3. Bureau:

20

4. Name of this Capital Asset:

CDC CCID Vaccine Tracking System (VTrckS)

5. Unique Project Identifier:

009-20-01-03-01-0278-00

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?

Mixed Life Cycle

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?

FY2002

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.

VTrckS has existed since the initiation of the Vaccines For Children (VFC) program in 1994. It serves to process >$2 billion in vaccine orders from state and local health departments. While the project has served its purpose well, changes in technology and business operations have created new challenges that must be addressed. The business of vaccine ordering and shipping has evolved beyond what was envisioned in 1994 and in order to continue functioning the information technology system will have to be brought in line with current (and anticipated) requirements. The value proposition for this increment of the CDC Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System Project is: 1) Improved program, project and provider financial accountability 2) Responsive delivery of vaccines to public and private providers 3) More effective acquisition and contract management of vaccine manufacturers 4) Enhanced support of immunization project managers The current phase of the VODS Project was initiated to determine how the business process that culminates in the delivery of vaccine materiel to providers who are certified to administer vaccines to eligible children, teens and adults can be supported more effectively and to implement the changes that are necessary. In the past year, the vaccine ordering and delivery business operations at the Corporate level, the Project level, and the Provider level were documented, modeled and analyzed. The information systems requirements were gathered, analyzed and depicted as Use Case Scenarios. Alternative means of addressing the requirements were developed including enhancement and reuse of existing systems support. The project was approved (selected) by the HHS/CDC Investment Review Board and TRB. It is currently in the "Control" phase of CDC's CPIC process.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?

yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?

2007-06-26

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?

yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?

Senior/Expert-level

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.

yes

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?

yes

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)

no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?

yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Budget Performance Integration
Expanded E-Government
Financial Performance

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)

VTrckS supports the initiative Budget Performance Integration by providing data to improve the efficient delivery of vaccines to public and private providers, reduce operating expenses and waste. VTrcks will monitor funds accurately and efficiently at the national as well as the project level supporting the initiative Financial Performance. VTrcks supports Expanded E_Government initiative by providing access to a segment of public electronic access to government programs.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?

no

15. Is this investment for information technology?

yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?

Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?

no

19. Is this a financial management system?

no

19.a.2. If no, what does it address?

Ordering and inventory levels for vaccines

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	3
Software	0
Services	97
Other	1

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?

n/a

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	Alice M. Brown
Phone Number	770-488-8223
Title	IT Security Project Manager
Email	AMBrown1@cdc.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?

no

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?

no

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.

All amounts represent Budget Authority

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).

Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2006	PY 2007	CY 2008	BY 2009
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.380	0.000	0.000	0.000
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	5.831	4.787	1.190	0.050
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	2.669	1.953	1.920	0.200
Government FTE Cost	0.690	0.260	0.140	0.050
# of FTEs	3	2	1	0

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?

no

3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.

FY09 budget decreased due to recent funding decisions.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measurement Area	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2005	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 4 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	5-7 business days to re-distribute vaccine from one coverage area to another
2	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 4 business days the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area
3	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by manufacturer	54.66M doses of vaccine shipped	95% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the manufacturers	99% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers
4	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	7 minutes to research account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to < 3 minutes per funding type	Decreased research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type
5	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4 work days to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle
6	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	2 Work days
7	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	1% of all vaccines ordered annually	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually
8	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of data is processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface
9	2006	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	Reduce 54 grantee depot systems used for vaccine distribution	Reduce grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 10%	Reduced 54 grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 0%
10	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduced to 3 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area
11	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	95% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	91.5% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers and distributor
12	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 3 minutes per funding type	Decreased research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type
13	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle
14	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	2 Work days
15	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually
16	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrcKs processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface
17	2007	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	Reduced 54 grantee depot systems for vaccine distribution by 0%	45% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots
18	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business days the redistribution time from one coverage area to another coverage area	N/A
19	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	96% of doses ordered were actually shipped by manufacturers and distributor	N/A
20	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 2 minutes per funding type	N/A
21	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
22	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
23	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
24	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
25	2008	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	65% reduction in the number of vaccine depots in 2007	N/A
26	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	Reduce to 3 business days the transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
27	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
28	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to 1 minutes per funding type	N/A
29	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
30	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
31	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
32	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
33	2009	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	85% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
34	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
35	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributorer as determined in 2009	N/A
36	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minute per funding type	N/A
37	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	2-4 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
38	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
39	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually in 2009	N/A
40	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
41	2010	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	>=95% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
42	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A
43	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Logistics Management	Percent of vaccine doses ordered versus vaccine doses actually shipped by distributor and manufacturers	73.34M doses of vaccine shipped	97% of doses ordered are actually shipped by the distributor	N/A
44	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Response Time	Amount of time to research project grantee account balances by funding type	Decrease research time to 4-5 minutes per funding type	Decrease research time to < 1 minutes per funding type	N/A
45	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Cycle Time	Number of workdays to complete the vaccine order-shipment-distribution cycle	4-5 workdays to complete the order-shipment-distribution cycle	1-3 workdays to place order, ship, distribute vaccine	N/A
46	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Customer Results	Customer Complaints	Amount of time for distributor/manufacturer to respond to customer inquiry regarding order/shipment	2 work days	2 work days or less	N/A
47	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	Data Reliability and Quality	Number of rejected vaccine orders due to incorrect contracts data (i.e., NDC#, package size, presentation, etc.)	< 1% of all vaccines ordered annually	2% of all vaccines ordered annually	N/A
48	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Technology	External Data Sharing	Percentage of data required by VTrckS processed via direct electronic interface versus file transfer	5% of all processes are currently direct electronic interface	Increase direct electronic interface processes to 95%	N/A
49	2011	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Consolidation of vaccine depots through conversion to direct ship	52% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	>= 95% reduction in the number of vaccine depots	N/A
50	2012	S.O. 2.2 - Protect the public against injuries and environmental threats	Mission and Business Results	Population Health Management and Consumer Safety	Improve redistribution of vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	5-7 business days to redistribute vaccine from one coverage area to another coverage area	3 business days total transfer time from one coverage area to another	N/A

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?

yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.

CDC Vaccine Ordering and Distribution System (VODS)

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?

no

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.

Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.

Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.

Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Reused Component Name	Reused UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Demand Forecasting / Mgmt	Defines the set of capabilities that facilitate the prediction of sufficient production to meet an organization's sales of a product or service.	Business Intelligence	Demand Forecasting / Mgmt			No Reuse	5
2	Ordering / Purchasing	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the placement of request for a product.	Supply Chain Management	Ordering / Purchasing			No Reuse	5
3	Contact and Profile Management	Defines the set of capabilities that provide a comprehensive view of all customer interactions, including calls, email, correspondence and meetings; also provides for the maintenance of a customer's account, business and personal information.	Customer Relationship Management	Contact and Profile Management			No Reuse	2
4	Online Help	Defines the set of capabilities that provide an electronic interface to customer assistance.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Help			No Reuse	2
5	Online Tutorials	Defines the set of capabilities that provide an electronic interface to educate and assist customers.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Tutorials			No Reuse	2
6	Quality Management	Defines the set of capabilities that help determine the level that a product or service satisfies certain requirements.	Management of Processes	Quality Management			No Reuse	5
7	Process Tracking	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the monitoring of activities within the business cycle.	Tracking and Workflow	Process Tracking			No Reuse	10
8	Strategic Planning and Mgmt	Defines the set of capabilities that support the determination of long-term goals and the identification of the best approach for achieving those goals.	Investment Management	Strategic Planning and Mgmt			No Reuse	5
9	Information Retrieval	Defines the set of capabilities that allow access to data and information for use by an organization and its stakeholders.	Knowledge Management	Information Retrieval			No Reuse	5
10	Decision Support and Planning	Defines the set of capabilities that support the analyze information and predict the impact of decisions before they are made.	Business Intelligence	Decision Support and Planning			No Reuse	10
11	Loading and Archiving	Defines the set of capabilities that support the population of a data source with external data.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving			No Reuse	5

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.

Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Online Help	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer 6.0
2	Process Tracking	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
3	Strategic Planning and Mgmt	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
4	Contact and Profile Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
5	Loading and Archiving	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
6	Ordering / Purchasing	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
7	Online Tutorials	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
8	Decision Support and Planning	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	Java
9	Demand Forecasting / Mgmt	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
10	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Java DataBase Connectivity (JDBC)
11	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Data Management	Database Connectivity	Open Database Connectivity
12	Quality Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	SAP Supply Chain Management
13	Loading and Archiving	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1
14	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Dynamic Server-Side Display	Active Server Pages
15	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	ADABAS
16	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Static Display	Hyper Text Markup Language
17	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Microsoft SQL Server
18	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Microsoft SQL Server 2005
19	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Microsoft Visual Basic .Net
20	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	Server Hardware, HP
21	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Wide Area Network (WAN)	SONET, Bellsouth
22	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T1
23	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Service Transport	Supporting Network Services	T3
24	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	VeriSign
25	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Visual FoxPro 9.0
26	Information Retrieval	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Web Browser	Windows Internet Explorer 6.0
27	Information Retrieval	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Support Platforms	Platform Dependent	z/OS

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?

yes

6.a. If yes, please describe.

This investment leverages: Federal Health Architecture (FHA)

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?

2007-08-31

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?

yes

1.c. If yes, describe any significant changes:

The risk management plan has been updated to include the work for the configuration of the replacement COTS system during the technology refresh of VTrckS.

3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:

Risk are mostly transferred to the vendor through use of a fixed price contract and mitigated in their operations, though room has been left in the investment schedule to incorporate any timing delays.

1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?

no

2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?

no

3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?

no