Exhibit 300 (BY2009) for ACF GrantSolutions.gov -Grants Administration Tracking Evaluation System (GATES) - Grants Center for Excellence

1. Date of Submission:

2008-02-04

2. Agency:

009

3. Bureau:

70

4. Name of this Capital Asset:

ACF GrantSolutions.gov / Grants Administration Tracking Evaluation System (GATES) - Grants Center for Excellence

5. Unique Project Identifier:

009-70-04-00-01-1356-24

6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?

Multi-Agency Collaboration

7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?

FY2002

8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.

The ACF Grants Center of Excellence (COE) operates GrantSolutions.gov / Grants Administration, Tracking and Evaluation System (GrantsSolutions.gov/GATES). GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES is one of two component systems of the Department's Enterprise-wide Grants Management System. The GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES system enables ACF to function as a full-fledged grants processing organization capable of supporting its expanded customer base of HHS service grant-making OPDIVs; while the NIH IMPAC II system supports research grants. This investment will provide for system enhancements and service delivery improvements as the various grants management and reporting processes currently in use at HHS OPDIVS continue to be unified, streamlined and standardized across the Department. This initiative is pursuant to the Secretary's "One HHS" goal, and is consistent with the HHS Strategic Plan goal to achieve excellence in management practices, and enhances the use of information technology in service delivery and record keeping by improving the accessibility and functionality of the technology. The COE is evolving as a Grants Management Line of Business (GMLoB) consortia provider. Functionally, GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES is used by grants officers and specialists to manage their grant programs and process grant applications from receipt through award. Financial information is exchanged electronically with the HHS UFMS enterprise financial system, and standards are being developed to interface with any financial accounting system. GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES is undergoing some modernization effort by moving from client-server to web based architecture, along with redesigning its data architecture, to enable GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES to support the E-Gov initiatives in the President's Management Agenda. This investment positions the COE to support other PMA strategies e.g. Improved Financial Performance, Budget and Performance Integration, and Strategic Management of Human Capital. ACF will follow the agency's capital programming process and related techniques to determine GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES' effectiveness in supporting the HHS and ACF mission and strategic goals, and to identify and implement needed improvements. Funding for the mixed life-cycle of this project encompasses operations and maintenance of the legacy GATES system, the migration of HHS OPDIVs to GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES, and other improvements in support of the GMLoB, and other PMA initiatives.

9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?

yes

9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?

2007-06-26

10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?

yes

11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?

Senior/Expert-level

12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.

yes

12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?

no

12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)

no

13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?

yes

If yes, select the initiatives that apply:

Initiative Name
Expanded E-Government
Faith Based and Community
Financial Performance

13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)

Expanded E-Gov: GATES successfully consolidated some 40 separate ACF grants programs and was chosen by HHS in 2004 to support other OPDIVS including AoA, CMS, HRSA, IHS, and OPHS. In 2006, OMB chose GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES as a GMLoB consortia provider. USDA was the first non-HHS agency to be supported by GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES, thereby achieving E-Gov performance gains across agency borders in support of the PMA. In 2007 the Denali Commission has signed up to be supported. See Question 8.

14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?

no

15. Is this investment for information technology?

yes

16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?

Level 3

17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)

(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?

yes

19. Is this a financial management system?

yes

19.a. If yes, does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?

yes

19.a.1. If yes, which compliance area:

GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES addresses the following FFMIA compliance areas; federal financial management system requirements, applicable Federal accounting standards, and the Standard General Ledger (SGL) at the transaction level.

19.b. If yes, please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A11 section 52.

GrantsSolutions.gov/GATES - Grants Center of Excellence

20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

Area	Percentage
Hardware	0
Software	0
Services	89
Other	11

21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?

n/a

22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.

Name	David Jenkins
Phone Number	202-690-5802
Title	Senior Privacy Official
Email	david.jenkins@acf.hhs.gov

23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?

yes

24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?

no

1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.

All amounts represent Budget Authority

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).

Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Cost Type	Py-1 & Earlier -2006	PY 2007	CY 2008	BY 2009
Planning Budgetary Resources	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Acquisition Budgetary Resources	1.770	1.022	1.045	1.069
Maintenance Budgetary Resources	7.160	3.590	3.610	3.660
Government FTE Cost	0.664	0.339	0.347	0.355
# of FTEs	3	3	3	3

2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?

no

3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.

New business partner's require additional, unanticipated development efforts. Project was re-baselined in May 2007 to include approximately $3M new development costs.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Row	Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal Supported	Measure- ment Area	Measure- ment Grouping	Measure- ment Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improve- ment to the Baseline	Actual Results
1	2005	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of service grant system funding development contracts	Four Contracts	Reduce to one contract (Enterprise GATES)	Reduced to one contract
2	2005	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of OPDIV-unique grants processes and policies	Three OPDIV-unique systems	Reduce to one system (Enterprise GATES)	Reduced to one system
3	2005	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of HHS social service grants managed through GATES	54%	Increase to 86%	Increased to 86%
4	2005	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of days between submission of grant application to initiation of HHS Review	21 days	Reduce to one day for electronic submission	Reduced to one day
5	2005	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GATES	99.0% scheduled availability	Increase to 99.5% scheduled availability	Increased to 99.5%
6	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of OPDIV grants management system requirements integrated within Enterprise GATES	Four OPDIVs (AoA, ACF, IHS, CMS)	Increase to six OPDIVs	Increased to six OPDIVS (added OPHS and HRSA)
7	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of Enterprise Architecture (EA) framework models completed	One model (As-Is) partially completed	Increase to two models (As-Is and To-Be) completed and integrated	Two models (As-Is and To-Be) completed and integrated
8	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Level of E-Authentication	E-Authentication level 1	Increase to E-Authentication level 2	Increased to E-Authentication level 2
9	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of ACF grants applications processed via Grants.gov	10% of grant applications submitted electronically	Increase to 20% of grant applications submitted electronically	Increased to 30% of grant applications via Grants.gov
10	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants reporting processed via OLDC	10% of grantees reporting via OLDC	Increase to 50% of grantees reporting via OLDC	Increased to 50% of grantees reporting via OLDC
11	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Functionality	Percent alignment of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES OLDC with ACF and HHS Enterprise IT Architecture	60% alignment, excluding some legacy GATES components (e.g., PowerBuilder clients)	Increase to 100% alignment, excluding some legacy GATES components (e.g., PowerBuilder clients)	Increased to 100% alignment, excluding some legacy GATES components (e.g.PowerBuilder clients)
12	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of days between submission of grant application to initiation of HHS review process	one day	Maintain one day	Maintained one day
13	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Number of days to review and approve GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES grant applications	Up to 90 days to review and approve grant applications	Reduce 20%, or up to 72 days, to review and approve grant applications	Reduced 20%, or up to 72 days, to review and approve grant applications
14	2006	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.5% scheduled availability	Increase to 99.9% scheduled availability	Increased to 99.9% scheduled availability
15	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	Six partners	Increase to seven partners	TBD
16	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	30% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 40% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
17	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	50% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 55% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
18	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry for grant applications	100% of 2006 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2006 processing time	TBD
19	2007	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
20	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	Seven partners	Increase to eight partners	TBD
21	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	40% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 45% of grant applications submitted electronically	TBD
22	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	55% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 60% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
23	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2007 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2007 processing time	TBD
24	2008	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
25	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	Eight partners	Increase to nine partners	TBD
26	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	45% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 50% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
27	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	60% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 65% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
28	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2008 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2008 processing time	TBD
29	2009	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
30	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	Nine partners	Increase to ten partners	TBD
31	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	50% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 55% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
32	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	65% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 70% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
33	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2009 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2009 processing time	TBD
34	2010	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
35	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	Ten partners	Increase to 11 partners	TBD
36	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	55% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 60% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
37	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	70% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 75% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
38	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2010 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2010 processing time	TBD
39	2011	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
40	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	11 partners	Increase to 12 partners	TBD
41	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	60% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 65% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
42	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	75% of grant reports submitted electronically	Increase to 80% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
43	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2011 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2011 processing time	TBD
44	2012	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD
45	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Mission and Business Results	Information Management	Number of partner grants management system requirements integrated within GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	12 partners	Increase to 13 partners	TBD
46	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grants applications processed electronically	65% of grant applications processed electronically	Increase to 70% of grant applications processed electronically	TBD
47	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Customer Results	Customer Impact or Burden	Percent of grant reports submitted electronically	80% of grant reports submitted electronically	Maintain 80% of grant reports submitted electronically	TBD
48	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Processes and Activities	Efficiency	Percent reduction of contractor data entry processing time for grant applications	100% of 2012 processing time	Decrease to 95% of 2012 processing time	TBD
49	2013	S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan	Technology	Availability	Percent of time for scheduled availability of GrantSolutions.gov/ GATES	99.9% scheduled availability	maintain 99.9% scheduled availability	TBD

1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?

yes

2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?

yes

2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.

ACF Grants Administration Tracking Evaluation System - Grants Center for Excellence

3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?

yes

3.a. If yes, provide the name of the segment architecture as provided in the agency’s most recent annual EA Assessment.

Grants Management

4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.

Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.

Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.

Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

Row	Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	Service Type	Component	Reused Component Name	Reused UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	Funding %
1	Intrusion Detection	Defines the set of capabilities that support the detection of illegal entrance into a computer system.	Security Management	Intrusion Detection			No Reuse	2
2	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis - Support the identification and monitoring of activities within an application, system, or network.	Security Management	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis			No Reuse	2
3	Cryptography	Support the use and management of ciphers, including encryption decryption processes, to ensure confidentiality and integrity of data.	Security Management	Cryptography			No Reuse	1
4	Digital Signature Management	Defines the set of capabilities that guarantee the unaltered state of a file.	Security Management	Digital Signature Management			No Reuse	0
5	Identification and Authentication	Defines the set of capabilities that support obtaining information about those parties attempting to log on to a system or application for security purposes and the validation of those users.	Security Management	Identification and Authentication			No Reuse	2
6	Access Control	Access Control - Support the management of permissions for logging onto a computer, application, service, or network; includes user management and role/privilege management.	Security Management	Access Control			No Reuse	2
7	System Resource Monitoring	Defines the set of capabilities that support the balance and allocation of memory, usage, disk space and performance on computers and their applications.	Systems Management	System Resource Monitoring			No Reuse	2
8	Software Distribution	Defines the set of capabilities that support the propagation, installation and upgrade of written computer programs, applications and components.	Systems Management	Software Distribution			No Reuse	2
9	Forms Creation	Defines the set of capabilities that support the design and generation of electronic or physical forms and templates for use within the business cycle by an organization and its stakeholders.	Forms Management	Forms Creation			No Reuse	2
10	Forms Modification	Defines the set of capabilities that support the maintenance of electronic or physical forms, templates and their respective elements and fields.	Forms Management	Forms Modification			No Reuse	1
11	Inbound Correspondence Management	Defines the set of capabilities that manage externally initiated communication between an organization and its stakeholders.	Routing and Scheduling	Inbound Correspondence Management			No Reuse	1
12	Outbound Correspondence Management	Defines the set of capabilities that manage internally initiated communication between an organization and its stakeholders.	Routing and Scheduling	Outbound Correspondence Management			No Reuse	1
13	Case Management	Defines the set of capabilities that manage the life cycle of a particular claim or investigation within an organization to include creating, routing, tracing, assignment and closing of a case as well as collaboration among case handlers.	Tracking and Workflow	Case Management			No Reuse	1
14	Process Tracking	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the monitoring of activities within the business cycle.	Tracking and Workflow	Process Tracking			No Reuse	2
15	Content Authoring	Defines the capabilities that allow for the creation of tutorials, CBT courseware, web sites, CD-ROMs and other interactive programs.	Content Management	Content Authoring			No Reuse	1
16	Content Publishing and Delivery	Defines the set of capabilities that allow for the propagation of interactive programs.	Content Management	Content Publishing and Delivery			No Reuse	1
17	Categorization	Defines the set of capabilities that allow classification of data and information into specific layers or types to support an organization.	Knowledge Management	Categorization			No Reuse	1
18	Information Sharing	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of documents and data in a multi-user environment for use by an organization and its stakeholders.	Knowledge Management	Information Sharing			No Reuse	1
19	Information Retrieval	Defines the set of capabilities that allow access to data and information for use by an organization and its stakeholders.	Knowledge Management	Information Retrieval			No Reuse	1
20	Information Mapping / Taxonomy	Defines the set of capabilities that support the creation and maintenance of relationships between data entities, naming standards and categorization.	Knowledge Management	Information Mapping / Taxonomy			No Reuse	1
21	Standardized / Canned	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of pre-conceived or pre-written reports.	Reporting	Standardized / Canned			No Reuse	0
22	OLAP	Defines the set of capabilities that support the analysis of information that has been summarized into multidimensional views and hierarchies.	Reporting	OLAP			No Reuse	0
23	Ad Hoc	Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of dynamic reports on an as needed basis.	Reporting	Ad Hoc			No Reuse	0
24	Modeling	Defines the set of capabilities that develop descriptions to adequately explain relevant data for the purpose of prediction, pattern detection, exploration or general organization of data.	Knowledge Discovery	Modeling			No Reuse	0
25	Data Mining	Defines the set of capabilities that provide for the efficient discovery of non-obvious, valuable patterns and relationships within a large collection of data.	Knowledge Discovery	Data Mining			No Reuse	0
26	Graphing / Charting	Defines the set of capabilities that support the presentation of information in the form of diagrams or tables.	Visualization	Graphing / Charting			No Reuse	0
27	Mapping / Geospatial / Elevation / GPS	Defines the set of capabilities that provide for the representation of position information through the use of attributes such as elevation, latitude, and longitude coordinates.	Visualization	Mapping / Geospatial / Elevation / GPS			No Reuse	0
28	Activity-Based Management	Defines the set of capabilities that support a defined, specific set of finance-related tasks for a given objective.	Financial Management	Activity-Based Management			No Reuse	1
29	Billing and Accounting	Defines the set of capabilities that support the charging, collection and reporting of an organization's accounts.	Financial Management	Billing and Accounting			No Reuse	1
30	Data Warehouse	Defines the set of capabilities that support the archiving and storage of large volumes of data.	Data Management	Data Warehouse			No Reuse	1
31	Data Recovery	Defines the set of capabilities that support the restoration and stabilization of data sets to a consistent, desired state.	Data Management	Data Recovery			No Reuse	1
32	Data Classification	Defines the set of capabilities that allow the classification of data.	Data Management	Data Classification			No Reuse	1
33	Data Mart	Defines the set of capabilities that support a subset of a data warehouse for a single department or function within an organization.	Data Management	Data Mart			No Reuse	1
34	Data Cleansing	Defines the set of capabilities that support the removal of incorrect or unnecessary characters and data from a data source.	Data Management	Data Cleansing			No Reuse	2
35	Meta Data Management	Defines the set of capabilities that support the maintenance and administration of data that describes data.	Data Management	Meta Data Management			No Reuse	1
36	Extraction and Transformation	Defines the set of capabilities that support the manipulation and change of data.	Data Management	Extraction and Transformation			No Reuse	1
37	Loading and Archiving	Defines the set of capabilities that support the population of a data source with external data.	Data Management	Loading and Archiving			No Reuse	1
38	Data Exchange	Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered.	Data Management	Data Exchange			No Reuse	0
39	Enterprise Application Integration	Defines the set of capabilities that support the redesigning of disparate information systems into one system that uses a common set of data structures and rules.	Development and Integration	Enterprise Application Integration			No Reuse	2
40	Legacy Integration	Defines the set of capabilities that support the communication between newer generation hardware/software applications and the previous, major generation of hardware/software applications.	Development and Integration	Legacy Integration			No Reuse	2
41	Data Integration	Defines the set of capabilities that support the organization of data from separate data sources into a single source using middleware or application integration and the modification of system data models to capture new information within a single system.	Development and Integration	Data Integration			No Reuse	2
42	Business Rule Management	Defines the set of capabilities that manage the enterprise processes that support an organization and its policies.	Management of Processes	Business Rule Management			No Reuse	1
43	Program / Project Management	Defines the set of capabilities that manage and control a particular effort of an organization.	Management of Processes	Program / Project Management			No Reuse	1
44	Governance / Policy Management	Defines the set of capabilities that influence and determine decisions, actions, business rules and other matters within an organization.	Management of Processes	Governance / Policy Management			No Reuse	1
45	Quality Management	Defines the set of capabilities that help determine the level that a product or service satisfies certain requirements.	Management of Processes	Quality Management			No Reuse	2
46	Risk Management	Risk Management - support the identification and probabilities or chances of hazards as they relate to a task, decision or long-term goal; includes risk assessment and risk mitigation.	Management of Processes	Risk Management			No Reuse	2
47	Change Management	Defines the set of capabilities that control the process for updates or modifications to the existing documents, software or business processes of an organization.	Management of Processes	Change Management			No Reuse	1
48	Requirements Management	Defines the set of capabilities that gather, analyze and fulfill the needs and prerequisites of an organization's efforts.	Management of Processes	Requirements Management			No Reuse	2
49	Configuration Management	Defines the set of capabilities that control the hardware and software environments, as well as documents of an organization.	Management of Processes	Configuration Management			No Reuse	2
50	Assistance Request	Defines the set of capabilities that support the solicitation of support from a customer.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Assistance Request			No Reuse	1
51	Online Tutorials	Defines the set of capabilities that provide an electronic interface to educate and assist customers.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Tutorials			No Reuse	1
52	Online Help	Defines the set of capabilities that provide an electronic interface to customer assistance.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Online Help			No Reuse	1
53	Reservations / Registration	Defines the set of capabilities that allow electronic enrollment and confirmations for services.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Reservations / Registration			No Reuse	1
54	Self-Service	Defines the set of capabilities that allow an organization's customers to sign up for a particular service at their own initiative.	Customer Initiated Assistance	Self-Service			No Reuse	1
55	Call Center Management	Defines the set of capabilities that handle telephone sales and/or service to the end customer.	Customer Relationship Management	Call Center Management			No Reuse	1
56	Customer / Account Management	Defines the set of capabilities that support the retention and delivery of a service or product to an organization's clients.	Customer Relationship Management	Customer / Account Management			No Reuse	1
57	Customer Feedback	Defines the set of capabilities that are used to collect, analyze and handle comments and feedback from an organization's customers.	Customer Relationship Management	Customer Feedback			No Reuse	2
58	Contact and Profile Management	Defines the set of capabilities that provide a comprehensive view of all customer interactions, including calls, email, correspondence and meetings; also provides for the maintenance of a customer's account, business and personal information.	Customer Relationship Management	Contact and Profile Management			No Reuse	1
59	Partner Relationship Management	Defines the set of capabilities that provide a framework to promote the effective collaboration between an organization and its business partners, particularly members of the distribution chain (e.g., channel and alliance partners, resellers, agents, brokers, and dealers) and other third parties that support operations and service delivery to an organization's customers; includes performance evaluation of partners, if necessary.	Customer Relationship Management	Partner Relationship Management			No Reuse	1
60	Issue Tracking	Defines the set of capabilities that receive and track user-reported issues and problems in using IT systems, including help desk calls.	Systems Management	Issue Tracking			No Reuse	2

5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.

Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

Row	SRM Component	>Service Area	Service Category	Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
1	Online Help	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	TBD
2	Billing and Accounting	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Hosting	TBD
3	Virus Protection	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	CA
4	Content Authoring	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	Documentum
5	Content Review and Approval	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	Documentum
6	Content Publishing and Delivery	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	Documentum
7	Forms Creation	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Java EE
8	Forms Modification	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Java EE
9	Data Exchange	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange	Oracle
10	Information Mapping / Taxonomy	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Oracle
11	Categorization	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Oracle
12	Meta Data Management	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Oracle
13	Data Classification	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Format / Classification	Oracle
14	Information Sharing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	Oracle
15	Data Cleansing	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	Oracle
16	Extraction and Transformation	Service Interface and Integration	Interoperability	Data Transformation	Oracle
17	Data Mart	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Oracle
18	Data Warehouse	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Oracle
19	Loading and Archiving	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Oracle
20	Data Recovery	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Database / Storage	Database	Oracle
21	Legacy Integration	Service Interface and Integration	Integration	Enterprise Application Integration	Oracle iAS
22	Enterprise Application Integration	Service Interface and Integration	Integration	Enterprise Application Integration	Oracle iAS
23	Business Rule Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Independent	Oracle iAS
24	Access Control	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Oracle IDM
25	Data Integration	Service Interface and Integration	Integration	Middleware	Oracle SOA
26	Identification and Authentication	Component Framework	Security	Supporting Security Services	Oracle SOA, IDM
27	Graphing / Charting	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	Oracle, Cognos
28	Mapping / Geospatial / Elevation / GPS	Component Framework	Presentation / Interface	Content Rendering	Oracle, Cognos
29	Audit Trail Capture and Analysis	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Oracle, Cognos
30	Information Retrieval	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Oracle, Cognos
31	Data Mining	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Oracle, Cognos
32	Ad Hoc	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Oracle, Cognos
33	Standardized / Canned	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Oracle, Cognos
34	OLAP	Component Framework	Data Management	Reporting and Analysis	Oracle, Cognos
35	Cryptography	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	PKI
36	Digital Signature Management	Component Framework	Security	Certificates / Digital Signatures	PKI
37	Risk Management	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Prosight
38	Certification and Accreditation	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Prosight
39	FISMA Management and Reporting	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Prosight
40	Governance / Policy Management	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Legislative / Compliance	Prosight, Metis
41	Requirements Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Rational
42	Program / Project Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Rational
43	Software Distribution	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Integrated Development Environment	Rational
44	Modeling	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Modeling	Rational
45	Process Tracking	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	Rational
46	Change Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	Rational
47	Configuration Management	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	Rational
48	Issue Tracking	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Software Engineering	Software Configuration Management	Rational
49	Call Center Management	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	Right Now Customer v7.0
50	Customer / Account Management	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	Right Now Customer v7.0
51	Partner Relationship Management	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	Right Now Customer v7.0
52	Customer Feedback	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	Right Now Customer v7.0
53	System Resource Monitoring	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Servers / Computers	Solaris, Windows Server
54	Online Tutorials	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	TBD
55	Self-Service	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	TBD
56	Reservations / Registration	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	TBD
57	Assistance Request	Service Access and Delivery	Access Channels	Collaboration / Communications	TBD
58	Incident Response	Service Access and Delivery	Service Requirements	Hosting	TBD
59	Intrusion Prevention	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Network Devices / Standards	TBD
60	Intrusion Detection	Service Platform and Infrastructure	Hardware / Infrastructure	Network Devices / Standards	TBD

6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?

no

1. As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

Row	Partner Agency	Joint exhibit approval date
1	009
2	005	2007-03-26
3	015
4	513	2007-04-20

2. Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution; Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B.

Capital Assets within this Investment

Row	Partner Agency	Partner Agency Asset Title	Partner Agency Asset UPI
1	009	ACF - GATES	009-70-04-00-01-1356-24
2	009	HRSA - Electronic Handbooks	009-15-01-06-01-1060-00
3	015	CDFI - Review Module

1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

yes

1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?

2007-06-29

1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?

no

1. Are you using EVM to manage this investment?

yes

1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?

no

1.b. If no, explain plans to implement EVM.

GrantSolutions currently uses EVM to manage this investment and meets all applicable standards.

1.c. If N/A, please provide date operational analysis was conducted and a brief summary of the results?

2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?

no

3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?

no