Exhibit 300 (BY2009) - Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service (OCSE), Administration for Children and Families
PART ONE
OVERVIEW
- 1. Date of Submission:
- 2008-02-04
- 2. Agency:
- 009
- 3. Bureau:
- 70
- 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
- ACF Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service (OCSE)
- 5. Unique Project Identifier:
- 009-70-01-04-01-1000-00
- 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?
- Mixed Life Cycle
- 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
- FY2001 or earlier
- 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.
- FPLS consists of 2 key components: National Directory of New Hires (NDNH), a database of employment data & Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders (FCR), a database of child support cases & orders. FPLS is crucial to helping OCSE fulfill its mission in assisting States to secure the financial support upon which millions of our nation's children depend & has contributed to an increase in the overall effectiveness & performance of the child support program. NDNH data matches resulted in national child support collections of approximately $475M in FY2006. In TY2006, the Federal Offset Program of the FPLS collected $1.6B. The Passport Denial Program of the FPLS resulted in denial of about 80 passports daily & over $22M in lump sum payments in CY2006. FPLS supports & is aligned with HHS, ACF, & OCSE goals & initiatives. Without the FPLS, the program would not be able to accomplish its mission & provide its services. FPLS eliminates traditional barriers between government agencies & promotes data sharing to improve program efficiencies & customer service. State & local CSE agencies use FPLS data to locate noncustodial parents who are delinquent in child support payments & to increase collections. States rely on FPLS to facilitate standardized & centralized communication & data exchanges with employers, multistate financial institutions & other Federal agencies. FPLS data are also used to reduce erroneous payments & overall program costs in Public Assistance & Benefit Programs. FPLS actively supports the PMA by providing authorized programs a centralized source of employment & location data, as well as the One Government initiative through a strong partnership between OCSE & SSA by relying on a consolidated infrastructure, leveraging IT resources & experience, & promoting data exchange efficiencies & program integration. The SSA estimates annual savings of approximately $403M in overpayment recovery & future overpayment prevention in the Supplemental Security Income program. SSA reports that the benefit-to-cost ratio for the entire program is estimated to be 11.4:1. Based on combined data from the FCR & SSA, IRS selected & audited Earned Income Tax Credit claims filed by 269,000 taxpayers in TY2003 & froze $713M in refunds. During FY2006, the Department of Education used NDNH data to collect over $1.3B from student loan defaulters. OCSE shared a 2007 IRMCO award for its data match efforts, helping to reduce HUD's improper payments by 73% or $712M.
- 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
- yes
- 9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?
- 2007-06-26
- 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
- yes
- 11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?
- Senior/Expert-level
- 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.
- no
- 12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?
- no
- 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?
- yes
- If yes, select the initiatives that apply:
Initiative Name Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives Budget Performance Integration Competitive Sourcing Eliminating Improper Payments Expanded E-Government Housing and Urban Development Management and Performance Human Capital
- 13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)
- ELIMINATING IMPROPER PAYMENTS & HUD MGMT: Generates more than $1.6B in savings in State & Fed. programs (including HUD) by preventing & recouping improper payments & collecting government debt. Promotes EXPANDED E-GOV at Federal & State levels via electronic transmission of employment data & child support, & real-time access to child support case & financial data, & promoting EFT/EDI. Supports COMPETITIVE SOURCING thru performance-based contracts. See Overview, Q. 8, Perf & Acq Strat Sections.
- 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?
- yes
- 14.a. If yes, does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?
- no
- 14.b. If yes, what is the name of the PARTed program?
- 2003: ACF - Child Support Enforcement
- 14.c. If yes, what rating did the PART receive?
- Effective
- 15. Is this investment for information technology?
- yes
- 16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?
- Level 3
- 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)
- (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment
- 18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?
- no
- 19. Is this a financial management system?
- no
- 19.a.2. If no, what does it address?
- FPLS consists of 2 key components: National Directory of New Hires (NDNH), a database of employment data & Federal Case Registry of Child Support Orders (FCR), a database of child support cases & orders. FPLS is crucial to helping OCSE fulfill its mission in assisting States to secure the financial support upon which millions of our nation's children depend & has contributed to an increase in the overall effectiveness & performance of the child support program.
- 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)
Area Percentage Hardware 3 Software 3 Services 90 Other 4
- 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
- n/a
- 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.
Name David Jenkins Phone Number 202-690-5802 Title Director, Division of Operations Email david.jenkins@acf.hhs.gov
- 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?
- yes
- 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?
- no
SUMMARY OF SPEND
- 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
All amounts represent Budget Authority
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented. Cost Type Py-1 & Earlier
-2006PY
2007CY
2008BY
2009Planning Budgetary Resources 0.842 0.000 0.000 0.000 Acquisition Budgetary Resources 1.961 2.742 1.938 2.035 Maintenance Budgetary Resources 29.221 16.961 18.260 19.299 Government FTE Cost 4.493 4.422 4.542 2.664 # of FTEs 32 24 24 16
- 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?
- no
- 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
- Beginning in February 2006, an Independent Baseline Validation of FPLS IT costs was conducted. The FPLS spending plan that was submitted in the FY2007 Exhibit 300 submission was reviewed by both an independent contractor to the FPLS, and by representatives from the HHS CPIC team. It was determined that many initiatives classified as DME under the previous baseline were actually program analysis projects or O&M enhancements. These initiatives have been reclassified as appropriate. In addition, the development lifecycle has been adjusted to match the scope of the current FPLS development initiative, as reflected in the approved Continuous Service Improvement (CSI) business case. Also, development and future maintenance costs related to legislative mandates have been updated to reflect initiatives that were passed as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. The new FPLS baseline was approved by the HHS ITIRB in May 2006. FPLS submitted a subsequent rebaseline request in April 2007. The changes are much smaller in scale, and reflect a redistribution of funds between work packages based on decisions made upon completion of the analysis phase of the CSI initiative. Also, additional FTEs from SSA have been added to the baseline to reflect a decision to migrate additional FPLS applications to the National Computer Center. This rebaseline request was approved by HHS on July 16, 2007.
PERFORMANCE
- Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.
Row Fiscal Year Strategic Goal Supported Measurement Area Measurement Grouping Measurement Indicator Baseline Planned Improvement to the Baseline Actual Results 1 2005 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2005: Achieve 88:1 Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2005: 146:1 2 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2006: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2006: 126:1 3 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2007: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2007: TBD 4 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2008: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2008: TBD 5 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2009: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2009: TBD 6 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2010: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2010: TBD 7 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio FY2004 FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 100:1 FY2011: Maintain FPLS Benefit-to-Cost Ratio greater than 75:1 FY2011: TBD 8 2005 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2005: $2.015 Billion FY2005: $2.156 Billion 9 2006 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2006: $2.167 Billion FY2006: $2.180 Billion 10 2007 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2007: $2.191 Billion FY2007: TBD 11 2008 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2008: $2.202 Billion FY2008: TBD 12 2009 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2009: $2.213 Billion FY2009: TBD 13 2010 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2010: $2.224 Billion FY2010: TBD 14 2011 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Mission and Business Results Social Services Total FPLS Attributable Child Support Collections (from Federal Offset, Passport Denial, MSFIDM, and NDNH-FCR matching). FY2004 FPLS attributable collections: $2.060 Billion 0.5% Annual Increase in FPLS-Attributable Collections FY2011: $2.235 Billion FY2011: TBD 15 2005 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Data Reliability and Quality Percent increase in number of locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching. FY2004: 6.5% increase from previous year. FY2005: 10% increase from previous year. FY2005: 16.0% increase from previous year 16 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Data Reliability and Quality Percent increase in number of locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching. FY2004: 6.5% increase from previous year. FY2006: 1% increase from previous year. FY2006: 4.6% increase from previous year 17 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Data Reliability and Quality Percent increase in number of locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching. FY2004: 6.5% increase from previous year. FY2007: 1% increase from previous year. FY2007: TBD 18 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Data Reliability and Quality Percent increase in number of locate records with valid SSN information that are available for matching. FY2004: 6.5% increase from previous year. FY2008: 1% increase from previous year. FY2008: TBD 19 2005 S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage Technology External Data Sharing Number of locate records and Federal enforcement actions taken on behalf of States each year through NDNH-FCR matching, MSFIDM account matches, Federal Offsets, and DMDC health insurance match. FY2004 Total FPLS Locate and Enforcement Actions on Behalf of States: 13.4 million FY2005: 13.4 million Locate and Enforcement Actions FY2005: 13.7 million Locate and Enforcement Actions 20 2006 S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage Technology External Data Sharing Number of locate records and Federal enforcement actions taken on behalf of States each year through NDNH-FCR matching, MSFIDM account matches, Federal Offsets, and DMDC health insurance match. FY2004 Total FPLS Locate and Enforcement Actions on Behalf of States: 13.4 million FY2006: 13.7 million Locate and Enforcement Actions FY2006: 14.4 million Locate and Enforcement Actions 21 2007 S.O. 1.1 - Broaden health insurance and long-term care coverage Technology External Data Sharing Number of locate records and Federal enforcement actions taken on behalf of States each year through NDNH-FCR matching, MSFIDM account matches, Federal Offsets, and DMDC health insurance match. FY2004 Total FPLS Locate and Enforcement Actions on Behalf of States: 13.4 million FY2007: 14.4 million Locate and Enforcement Actions FY2007: TBD 22 2005 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2005: Exceptional standards met in 5 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. 23 2006 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2006: Exceptional standards met in 2 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. 24 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2007: TBD 25 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2008: TBD 26 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2009: TBD 27 2010 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2010: TBD 28 2011 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Technology Availability Number of FPLS data processing and system availability measures where exceptional standards are met in all four quarters. FY2004: Exceptional standards met in 4 of 9 categories for all 4 quarters; minimum standards met in all 9 categories. Exceptional standards met in all 9 categories for all 4 quarters. FY2011: TBD 29 2007 S.O. 3.4 - Address the needs, strengths and abilities of vulnerable populations Customer Results Access Number of legislatively authorized State and Federal Agencies for which data matches have been implemented to support government-wide cost savings. FY2006: Conducted data matches with 56 State and Federal Agencies. FY2007: Conduct data matches with 56 State and Federal Agencies. FY2007: TBD 30 2008 S.O. 3.4 - Address the needs, strengths and abilities of vulnerable populations Customer Results Access Number of legislatively authorized State and Federal Agencies for which data matches have been implemented to support government-wide cost savings. FY2006: Conducted data matches with 56 State and Federal Agencies. FY2008: Conduct data matches with 57 State and Federal Agencies. FY2008: TBD 31 2005 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2005: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2005: 27% increase in interstate transactions. 32 2006 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2006: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2006: 12% increase in interstate transactions. 33 2007 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2007: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2007: TBD 34 2008 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2008: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2008: TBD 35 2009 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2009: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2009: TBD 36 2010 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2010: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2010: TBD 37 2011 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Access Percent increase in interstate communication achieved by improving quality of interstate data and facilitating electronic data exchange between States. FY2004: 7.9 million interstate transactions exchanged. FY2011: 3% increase in interstate transactions. FY2011: TBD 38 2007 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Security Number of States conducting Secure FTP pilot by September 2007. 0 States using Secure FTP in FY2006 Conduct 2 State pilots of Secure FTP in FY2007 FY2007: TBD 39 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct-net for interstate communication. FY2007 - 0 States using C:D-net FY2008: 15 States Using C:D-net by September 2008. FY2008: TBD 40 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency Number of States migrated to NCC's Connect:Direct-net for interstate communication. FY2007 - 0 States using C:D-net FY2009: 30 States Using C:D-net by September 2009. FY2009: TBD 41 2008 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Technology External Data Sharing Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States due to implementation of insurance match. FY2006: 14.4 million total FPLS locate and enforcement actions taken on behalf of States. FY2008: 0.5% increase in locate and enforcement actions. FY2008: TBD 42 2009 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Technology External Data Sharing Annual percent increase in locate and asset information returned to States due to implementation of insurance match. FY2006: 14.4 million total FPLS locate and enforcement actions taken on behalf of States. FY2009: 0.5% increase in locate and enforcement actions. FY2009: TBD 43 2008 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Service Efficiency Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically. FY2007: # of e-IWOs sent to DFAS (TBD) FY2008: 10% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers. FY2008: TBD 44 2009 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Customer Results Service Efficiency Annual percent increase in number of IWOs sent electronically. FY2007: # of e-IWOs sent to DFAS (TBD) FY2009: 10% increase in number of e-IWOs sent from States to Employers. FY2009: TBD 45 2008 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency Number of States and Employers with access to e-IWO portal for data exchange. FY2007: # of States (TBD) and 1 National Employer using e-IWO. FY2008: 10 States and 5 national employers using e-IWO. FY2008: TBD 46 2009 Effective Management of Human Capital / Information Technology / Resources Processes and Activities Efficiency Number of States and Employers with access to e-IWO portal for data exchange. FY2007: # of States (TBD) and 1 National Employer using e-IWO. FY2009: 15 States and 10 national employers using e-IWO. FY2009: TBD 47 2008 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Technology External Data Sharing Percent increase in locate information achieved by providing States with data from new locate sources. FY2006: 14.4 million total FPLS locate and enforcement actions taken on behalf of States. FY2008: 3% increase in locate and enforcement actions. FY2008: TBD 48 2009 S.O. 3.1 - Promote the economic independence and social well-being of individuals and families across the lifespan Technology External Data Sharing Percent increase in locate information achieved by providing States with data from new locate sources. FY2006: 14.4 million total FPLS locate and enforcement actions taken on behalf of States. FY2008: 3% increase in locate and enforcement actions. FY2009: TBD
Enterprise Architecture
- 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
- yes
- 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
- yes
- 2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
- ACF Expanded Federal Parent Locator Service
- 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?
- no
- 4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.
Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service. Row Agency Component Name Agency Component Description Service Type Component Reused Component Name Reused UPI Internal or External Reuse? Funding % 1 Data Exchange Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered. Data Management Data Exchange No Reuse 15 2 Ad Hoc Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of dynamic reports on an as needed basis. Reporting Ad Hoc No Reuse 5 3 Record Linking / Association Defines the set of capabilities that support the correlation between logical data and information sets. Records Management Record Linking / Association No Reuse 1 4 Information Sharing Defines the set of capabilities that support the use of documents and data in a multi-user environment for use by an organization and its stakeholders. Knowledge Management Information Sharing No Reuse 5 5 Inbound Correspondence Management Defines the set of capabilities that manage externally initiated communication between an organization and its stakeholders. Routing and Scheduling Inbound Correspondence Management No Reuse 7 6 Query Defines the set of capabilities that support retrieval of records that satisfy specific query selection criteria. Search Query No Reuse 67
- 5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.
FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.
Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. Row SRM Component >Service Area Service Category Service Standard Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) 1 Data Exchange Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Border Gateway Protocol 2 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Format / Classification Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 3 Data Exchange Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport File Transfer Protocol (FTP) 4 Data Exchange Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport TCP/IP 5 Information Sharing Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Apache Tomcat 6 Data Exchange Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Connect:Direct 7 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Integration Enterprise Application Integration Connect:Direct 8 Data Exchange Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange SOAP 9 Information Sharing Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Web Servers Apache HTTP Server 10 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Format / Classification Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) 11 Data Exchange Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment Eclipse 12 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Legislative / Compliance 36 CFR Part 1194 13 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks 14 Query Service Interface and Integration Interface Service Description / Interface Application Program Interface (API) / Protocol 15 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Border Gateway Protocol 16 Query Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe 17 Query Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering Cascading Style Sheets 18 Query Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Java Database Connectivity 19 Query Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Virtual Storage Access Method 20 Query Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 21 Query Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display Hyper Text Markup Language 22 Query Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering XHTML 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language 23 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1 24 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport Hypertext Transfer Protocol with SSL 25 Query Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Java 2 Enterprise Edition 26 Query Component Framework Presentation / Interface Dynamic Server-Side Display Java Server Pages 27 Query Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Lightweight Directory Access Protocol 28 Query Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Secure Sockets Layer 29 Data Exchange Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Oracle Database 10g 30 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe 31 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM DB2 32 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Dependent IBM z/OS- Duplicate 33 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM zSeries 34 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Wide Area Network (WAN) Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service 35 Inbound Correspondence Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Resource Access Control Facility 36 Inbound Correspondence Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport TCP/IP 37 Record Linking / Association Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe 38 Record Linking / Association Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Independent COBOL2 39 Record Linking / Association Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Connect:Direct 40 Record Linking / Association Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Dependent IBM z/OS- Duplicate 41 Record Linking / Association Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM zSeries 42 Ad Hoc Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe 43 Ad Hoc Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Independent COBOL2 44 Ad Hoc Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Connect:Direct 45 Ad Hoc Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Dependent IBM z/OS- Duplicate 46 Ad Hoc Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM zSeries 47 Ad Hoc Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Wide Area Network (WAN) Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service 48 Query Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM DB2 Enterprise Server Edition 8 49 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Transformation XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0 50 Information Sharing Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis MySQL 51 Query Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering Dynamic Hypertext Markup Language 52 Data Exchange Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol 53 Data Exchange Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent JavaScript 54 Data Exchange Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1 55 Data Exchange Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling Unified Modeling Language 56 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interface Service Description / Interface Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 57 Data Exchange Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Web Services Security (WS-Security) 58 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Types / Validation XML Schema 59 Data Exchange Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Transformation C
- 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?
- no
PART TWO
RISK
Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks.
- 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
- yes
- 1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?
- 2007-04-27
- 1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?
- no
- 2.b. If no, what is the strategy for managing the risks?
- Not applicable.
- 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
- In order to address and quantify the various risks of the alternatives under consideration, sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the effects on total costs and benefits based on changes in individual component cost variables. The results were used to risk adjust cost and schedule estimates for the projected lifecycle of the FPLS investment under the selected alternative. These analyses were also considered when determining the final risk-adjusted return for each alternative. Cost and benefit estimates were derived using current contract prices for similar work, and current benefit statistics reported by OCSE. In addition, each alternative was measured for mission, schedule, security, risk, and enterprise compliance. Contracts are structured into modules or segments, each with unique deliverables and incentives and with progress reported using an earned value approach. Each individual project has its project plan, cost, and schedule approved by OCSE's Strategic Planning and Oversight Board. These costs and schedules are risk adjusted using the risks identified during the economic sensitivity analysis, and any new risk that may affect cost and schedule are discussed and incorporated before approval to proceed is granted. Using this approach to contracting, the Government assumes minimal risk for achievement of cost, schedule and performance goals.
COST & SCHEDULE
- 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard 748?
- yes
- 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%?
- no
- 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?
- no





