|
FY 2007 HHS Annual PlanStrategic Goal 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance Measure Table |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Performance Measure: Expand actively participating sites in MedSun Network |
||
|
Year |
Target |
Result |
|
2007 |
Expand activily participating site in the MedSun Network to 76% |
01/2008 |
|
2006 |
Expand activily participating site in the MedSun Network to 71% |
01/2007 |
|
2005 |
Expand MedSun Network to 350 facilities |
354 facilities |
|
2004 |
Expand MedSun Network to 240 facilities |
299 facilities |
|
2003 |
Expand MedSun Network to 180 facilities |
206 facilities |
|
2002 |
Expand MedSun Network to 80 facilities |
80 facilities |
|
Data Source: CDRH Adverse Events Reports |
||
|
Data Validation: FDA's adverse event reporting system's newest component is the Medical Device Surveillance Network, MedSun program. MedSun is an initiative designed both to educate all health professionals about the critical importance of being aware of, monitoring for, and reporting adverse events, medical errors and other problems to FDA and/or the manufacturer and; to ensure that new safety information is rapidly communicated to the medical community thereby improving patient care. |
||
|
Performance Budget Reference: FDA FY 2007 CJ, Pg. 357. |
||
In FY 2005, FDA increased the number of facilities in the MedSun network to 354, thus completing the network. In FY 2006 and FY 2007, FDA will turn its focus to ensuring active participation (at least 1 report submitted a year by each site). In FY 2007, FDA will seek to expand the percentage of actively participating sites in the MedSun network to 76%. Active participation in the network will increase the number of reports and improve the likelihood that FDA will reduce device-related medical errors. Moreover, this will provide an advanced warning system among the facilities in the network and create a two-way communication channel between FDA and the user-facility community.
FDA plans to use the following strategies to accomplish this:
FDA will continue to recruit additional facilities to replace existing facilities that have decided to place a low priority on participating in this voluntary network. This will increase the overall effectiveness of the system while holding the total number of facilities to approximately 350, which FDA believes is the optimum size.
Some of the external factors that will influence the success of the MedSun program are awareness of hospital staff in recognizing medical device problems, fear that the hospitals might face legal action due to reporting an adverse event, and the burden of submitting reports. MedSun will minimize these factors by training hospital staff in the recognition and reporting of medical device problems, assuring reporting confidentiality, minimizing the burdens of participation, and providing timely feedback on device safety issues including monthly newsletters, clinical engineering audio-conferences, device safety exchanges, and surveys on high-profile safety concerns.
Performance Measure: Improve the timeliness and responsiveness of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to emerging needs in clinical prevention.
The Prevention Portfolio conducts comprehensive assessments of a wide range of preventive services including screening tests, counseling activities, immunizations, and preventive therapies. The United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a vital component of the Prevention Portfolio. The overall goal of the USPSTF is to provide evidence-based recommendations relevant to primary care providers. The Task Force works to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare delivery by promoting patient safety and by providing evidence-based recommendations for essential and non-essential clinical preventive services. One of the three overarching measures of success for the USPSTF is to improve the timeliness and responsiveness to emerging needs in clinical prevention. These needs include diseases that often are preventable, such as heart disease, diabetes, some cancers, and HIV/AIDS which result in premature deaths every year. By providing timely knowledge of clinical prevention, wider access and increase use of effective health care services is possible and thus could reduce health care costs.
|
Performance Measure Table |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Performance Measure: Improve the timeliness and responsiveness of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to emerging needs in clinical prevention. |
||
|
Year |
Target |
Result |
|
2007 |
Decrease by 10% the number of USPSTF recommendations that are five years or older. |
12/2007 |
|
2006 |
Increase the number of annual topics reviewed by the task force by 10%. |
12/2007 |
|
2005 |
Establish baseline measures for timeliness and responsiveness.* |
Released 9 recommendations 78% current within National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) standards 100% of guidelines related to IOM priority areas for preventive care current with NGC standards Developed new topic criteria, submission, review, and prioritization processes with new USPSTF topic prioritization workgroup |
|
Data Source: Two stakeholder meetings, an expert panel, and 4 clinician focus groups were conducted. The outcomes for these meetings identified what types of preventive services are being implemented and current barriers to further implementation. These qualitative sources of data assisted in determining best practices for delivering clinical preventive services as well as the quality of services being delivered. FY 2005 focused on the outcome measures to asses the quality and quantity of preventive services delivered. These measures focus on AHRQ's National Health Quality Report (NHQR) and Disparities Report (NHDR). These reports are composed of measures from multiple databases (i.e., Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Consumer Assessment of Health Plans. |
||
|
Data Validation: Qualitative data sources (Stakeholder meetings, expert panels and focus groups) were conducted and synthesized by outside contractors. Established methodology for interpreting qualitative data was used. Results were presented at peer-reviewed scientific meetings. As a result, the process and findings were validated by outside stakeholders. Qualitative data sources (NHQR and NHDR). AHRQ annually produces the NHQR and NHDR as legislated by Congress. These reports are comprised of multiple databases supported by AHRQ. Thus the data undergoes internal review processes associated with the individual database as well as a global review as an annual report. AHRQ staff along with external partners review the measures and the validity of measures periodically throughout the year. In addition, the final versions of the NHQR and NHDR undergo Federal partner review as well as Departmental review. |
||
|
Performance Budget Reference: AHRQ FY 2007 CJ. |
||
|
This is a new measure that was developed in FY 2005. Data is not applicable for FY 2002-2004. |
In FY 2007, AHRQ will begin to decrease by 10% the number of USPSTF recommendations that are five years or older to ensure that recommendations remain current within National Guidelines Clearinghouse standards. In FY 2005, AHRQ worked to establish baseline measures for timeliness and responsiveness to the emerging needs of clinicians. AHRQ held stakeholder meetings to identify which recommendations were effective and what tools were needed to improve their quality and usability.
The portfolio was directed to develop both print and electronic forms of the recommendations. As a result, AHRQ released a clinical pocket guide work and began working on the expansion of a PDA as a clinical decision-making tool.
In FY 2006, AHRQ is working to increase the number of annual topics reviewed by the task force by 10 percent. To date, the USPSTF has reviewed over 70 topics in the area of primary and secondary clinical prevention that address issues of screening, counseling, and chemoprophylaxis. Moreover, the Task Force has eliminated its backlog of topics, as evidenced by the release of 20 new recommendations. It continues to engage primary clinicians to address the situation where there is insufficient evidence for the Task Force to make a recommendation. AHRQ continues to collaborate with other Federal agencies to shape research agendas in the area of clinical prevention by facilitating the communication of these research gaps directly to funding agencies.
Last revised: February 20, 2006