Chairman Horn, Congressman Turner, distinguished Subcommittee members, I am pleased to
have this opportunity to discuss the findings of the fiscal 1998 Chief Financial Officer's (CFO) audit of the Health Care Financing
Administration by the Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General. This is
the third such comprehensive audit, which looks at our financial statements and whether we
pay claims properly. We are grateful for the valuable insights these audits provide and
are making substantial improvements because of them.
This year's audit shows that the Medicare
payment error rate is still too high. We are pleased that we have cut the error rate in
half in just two years, from 14 percent to 7 percent. However, that 7 percent represents
some $12.6 billion taxpayer dollars, which we all agree is simply unacceptable. We must be
diligent in sustaining and increasing the improvement. To do that, we have a number of
initiatives under way and have initiated a comprehensive program integrity plan. We look
forward to your continued support in these efforts.
We would not have come so far without the support of this Committee and Congress. We
are particularly grateful for the steady program integrity funding provided under the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) that allows us to plan and
maintain comprehensive program integrity efforts. The Balanced Budget Act also provided
essential tools to protect program integrity and fight fraud, waste, and abuse.
We are also pleased that this year's audit
found that only one remaining problem area, contractor accounts receivable, prevents us
from receiving an unqualified opinion. While we are working with the Inspector General's office to develop a short term solution to put in
place for next year's audit, a full remedy
involves systems changes that must be delayed until we have cleared the Year 2000 computer
The audit was conducted with our full cooperation and we welcome the Inspector General's findings. These audits provide a valuable roadmap
directing us to areas that need attention. The findings in the previous audits helped us
improve our accounting systems and highlighted areas in which our operations could be
strengthened. As a result, we have cleaned up our accounts payable and Social Security
Administration receivable problems and made other necessary corrections.
Since the Clinton Administration took office, the Department of Health and Human
Services has taken numerous steps to implement a "zero
tolerance" policy for waste, fraud and abuse. To
do this, we must assure that we pay the right amount, to a legitimate provider, for
covered, reasonable and necessary services for an eligible beneficiary. Achieving this
goal is one of our top priorities at HCFA. With help from Congress, providers,
beneficiaries, and our many other partners, we have achieved record success in assuring
proper payments. We have also made considerable progress in fighting fraud by increasing
investigations, indictments, convictions, fines, penalties, and restitutions.
In February, we released a Comprehensive Plan for Program Integrity. Its development
began one year ago when we sponsored an unprecedented national conference on fraud, waste,
and abuse in Washington, D.C., with broad representation from our many partners in this
effort. The bulk of the conference consisted of discussions on how we could build on the
highly successful Operation Restore Trust demonstration project, in which we increased
collaboration with law enforcement and other partners to target known problem areas.
Groups of experts from private insurers, consumer advocates, health care provider groups,
state health officials and law enforcement agencies were invited to share successful
techniques and explore new ideas. Their discussions were synthesized and analyzed to
determine the most effective strategies and practices already in place, and the new ideas
that deserve further exploration. The result is a Comprehensive Program Integrity Plan
with several clear objectives. These objectives include:
Increasing the Effectiveness of Medical Review and Benefit Integrity Activities.
Medical review activities, where physicians review medical records to ensure that claims
are correct, include all actions taken by contractors to determine whether a particular
service was medically necessary and was appropriately provided. Benefit integrity
activities, such as data analysis and complaint investigation, allow us to identify and
pursue improper billers. The first initiative under our Comprehensive Plan includes:
- Tightening the performance standards for, and evaluation of, contractor medical review
and benefit integrity units;
- Conducting training by the HHS Inspector General's
office for 500 HCFA and Medicare contractor staff to improve the quality of information
included in any referrals of cases of suspected fraud by HCFA
contractors to the Inspector General.
- Engaging independent contractors to evaluate key medical review processes.
Implementing the Medicare Integrity Program. This allows us to hire special
contractors who will focus solely on program integrity, as authorized under the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. We are now reviewing public comments on a
proposed regulation for how these contracts will work. Until now, only insurance companies
who process Medicare claims have been able to conduct audits, medical reviews, and other
program integrity activities. Under the new authority, we can contract with many more
firms who can bring new energy and ideas to this essential task. We expect to have four
new types of contractors:
- Payment Safeguard Contractors will focus on medical review, fraud case development, cost
report audits and related program safeguard functions as needed;
- a Coordination of Benefits Contractor will consolidate all activities associated with
making sure Medicare does not pay for claims when other insurers are liable;
- a Statistical Analysis Contractor will provide a comprehensive on-going analysis of
trends, utilization data and other information which helps detect fraud, waste, and abuse;
- Managed Care Integrity Contractor(s) will target the issues that are unique to health
We have already issued one Program Safeguard Contract solicitation to establish a
multiple awards contract for these activities, and expect to have a schedule of approved
contractors shortly. Once established, the multiple awards contract will allow us to issue
Task Orders for any or all program integrity activities. This way we can have a pool of
contractors available to undertake the work before we solicit proposals for specific
contractors' workloads. This lets us experiment
with various configurations of program integrity activities, and provides flexibility that
will help mitigate risk related to the Year 2000 issue and other challenges. We also will
be able to turn to these contractors when various situations arise, such as the appearance
of new scams or the departure of another contractor.
Proactively Addressing the Balanced Budget Act. This law created several new
programs, benefits, and payment systems which all create new vulnerabilities. We are
to address potential program integrity problems before they occur for:
- diabetes self-management, mammography screening, prostate cancer screening, and
osteoporosis screening benefits;
- reimbursement changes for physicians Assistants and nurse practitioners;
- the prospective payment system for skilled nursing facilities; and
- the Children's Health Insurance Program.
Promote Provider Integrity. We intend to make clear that we do not simply pay
bills, but enter into agreements to do business with providers. To do so, we will:
- step up efforts to educate providers on how to comply with program rules;
- increase the number of unannounced onsite visits; and
- publish a proposed regulation to establish clear enrollment
requirements, including conditions under which we will deny or revoke billing privileges.
Prepare for the Year 2000 Computer Issue. We have special work groups exploring
how the millennium problem could affect program integrity efforts. They are evaluating the
function, value, and Year 2000 risks for each of our efforts, and are developing a plan to
mitigate or circumvent any problems if they do arise.
Target Known Problem Areas. These include inpatient hospital care, managed
care, congregate care (delivered in settings such as assisted living facilities), nursing
homes, and community mental health centers.
- Inpatient Hospital Care. We will step up efforts to investigate, correct, and
prevent problems documented in audits of Medicare, such as providing unnecessary or
uncovered services, failing to properly document care, and coding claims incorrectly.
- Managed Care. As mentioned above, we will hire a special program integrity
contractor to focus on managed care, where fraud, waste, and abuse are more likely to
involve inadequate care, avoiding enrollment of high-cost patients, and misrepresenting
data on which payment rates are based. We expect such contractors to verify data, review
beneficiary appeals to ensure that access to care is not denied inappropriately, and
monitor plan compliance with Medicare rules.
- Congregate Care. Beneficiaries in nursing homes, assisted living centers or adult
day care facilities are easy targets because there is easy access to large numbers of
beneficiary billing numbers. Unscrupulous providers conduct Agang visits"
in which all beneficiaries receive a service or supply whether they need it or not, or
they submit bills for every beneficiary without furnishing anything at all. They also
submit duplicate bills to both Medicare and other payers for services that only one payer
should cover. We will mount Operation Restore Trust style projects to fight these types of
scams. We also will work to anticipate shifting incentives for congregate care fraud,
waste, and abuse as we move to more prospective payment systems.
- Nursing Homes. As one of our original Operation Restore Trust focus areas, much is
already underway to fight fraud, waste, and abuse and improve the quality of care. We will
continue our initiative, announced by the President this past summer. Last month, we
announced a number of steps that build on the President's
initiatives to promote quality care for 1.6 million elderly and disabled Americans in
nearly 17,000 nursing homes. These steps include a new regulation that subjects nursing
homes with problems to tougher fines; instructions to states to investigate complaints
about harm to nursing home residents more quickly; a national campaign to prevent neglect
and abuse of nursing home residents; and a website link at www.medicare.gov aimed at
getting comparative information about nursing homes to families. We will continue to
develop Operation Restore Trust style projects targeted on specific nursing home fraud,
waste, and abuse problems.
- Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs). As another of our earlier Operation Restore
Trust focus areas, much is already being done to stop abuses in this area, as well. We
have a 10-point action plan underway which first and foremost ensures that beneficiaries
who need intensive psychiatric services get them from qualified providers. We are doing so
through coordination with other agencies, providers, and advocacy groups. This beneficiary
protection is essential as we terminate the worst offenders and work aggressively to bring
others into compliance with all rules and regulations. We are increasing claims review and
developing a prospective payment system that will eliminate incentives for inappropriate,
unnecessary or inefficient care. We also are increasing scrutiny of new applicants and
requiring site visits nationwide to ensure that they meet all of Medicare=s core requirements. Already this year we have denied
Medicare participation to more than 100 applicants because they failed to provide all the
required services. President Clinton is seeking legislation to strengthen CMHC enforcement
activities by: authorizing fines for falsely certifying a beneficiary=s eligibility for partial hospitalization services;
prohibiting partial hospitalization services from being provided in a beneficiary=s home or other residential setting; and authorizing
the Secretary to set additional requirements for CMHCs to participate in the Medicare
In conducting the CFO audit, the Inspector General found that our contractors paid the
vast majority of claims correctly based on the information submitted by providers on
claims. The estimated error rate was determined by visiting HCFA contractors, requesting
supporting documentation from providers, and reviewing the medical records of 5,540
fee-for-service claims paid in fiscal 1998 for 600 beneficiaries. Of these, 915 should not
have been paid. The error rate identified in the audit could only be found by manually
reviewing supporting documentation and medical records from providers. This is a very
expensive, labor intensive process, and we do not have resources for such extensive
investigation of every claim.
In the case of the 915 erroneous claims, the auditors found that the providers had not
demonstrated that the claim was in accordance with Medicare laws and regulations. By
projecting these results to the entire universe of Medicare claims, the Inspector General
arrived at a midpoint estimate of $12.6 billion in improper payments nationwide or about
7.1 percent of the total Medicare fee-for-service benefit payments. Due to the limited
size and variance of the sample, however, the true level of improper payments could range
from 4.4 to 9.9 percent.
Documentation Errors represented the most dramatic improvement in this year's audit. They had been the single largest factor in
our error rate in past audits, and have declined by almost 80 percent from fiscal 1996 to
fiscal 1998. They now account for approximately 17 percent of the claim errors.
Documentation errors occur when the records are not sufficient to justify a claim. The
drop is primarily attributed to HCFA's enhanced
claims review activities; and HCFA and Inspector General outreach efforts. As part of
that, I would especially like to thank the provider groups with whom we have worked to
educate their members on the importance of documenting and filing claims correctly.
Lack of Medical Necessity is the largest factor identified as resulting in improper
payments in fiscal 1998. Over one-half of the erroneous claims fell into this category,
which covers situations in which the medical records contained sufficient documentation to
allow professional medical review staff to determine that the services were, in fact, not
medically necessary. Even here, however, we have shown improvement - a nearly 20 percent
decline in erroneous payments due to medical necessity between fiscal 1996 and fiscal
Incorrect Coding is another problem identified by the CFO audit. These types of
errors accounted for approximately 18 percent of the claim errors. Incorrect coding errors
occur when the documentation provided supports a lower level of service than is billed.
Medical professionals who reviewed the documentation determined that the service was not
as complex as the provider claimed, and that Medicare had therefore paid too much. These
errors have decreased by 24 percent since last year.
Noncovered Services is another payment error problem. The Inspector General noted
that a small percentage of improper payments were for services not covered by Medicare.
Such claims were for services that fee-for-service Medicare by law does not cover, such as
routine physical examinations, routine ear and eye examinations and most routine foot
care. This type of improper payment has declined by 50 percent since fiscal 1996.
Almost 80 percent of the incorrect payments found in the fiscal 1998 audit occurred in
five areas: inpatient hospital services (26 percent), physician services (25 percent),
home health agencies (13 percent), and outpatient hospital services (13 percent). The
remaining 20 percent were made in other categories. Several initiatives in our
Comprehensive Plan for Program Integrity address these specific findings and we are
zeroing in on these key areas.
Bolstering Provider Education. First and foremost, we want to ensure that
providers understand our coding and documentation rules. Most providers who make billing
errors have no intent to do anything wrong, but simply make mistakes. Still, these
mistakes are costly both to the provider and to the taxpayer, and they must be stopped. We
are bolstering our provider education efforts to make sure that happens.
Last year we piloted, in thirteen states, a multi-faceted provider education project
developed by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Florida. We will be expanding the project this
year. Its first component is a seminar on proper documentation and coding under Medicare.
The seminar is aimed at hospital billing agents and other providers and their employees
responsible for billing Medicare. We broadcast the seminar via satellite, and in one
broadcast alone, we reached over 10,000 people at hundreds of sites in hospitals and other
providers across the Southeast. Combined with 44 live seminars that we also conducted, our
seminars reached more than 19,000 people this year alone. And we know that they work. We
tested participants' knowledge of Medicare rules
both before and after the seminars, and found a big improvement in test scores.
We have also targeted medical schools, to reach medical residents just as they are
about to start their own practices. Last year, we taught over 6,000 residents, almost
one-quarter of all of the residents that graduated nationally, about setting up their
practices to bill Medicare correctly.
And, we have turned to the Internet to advance our cause. We now have training modules
on the web that can be used by any physician, office clerk, hospital employee, or anyone
else with Medicare billing responsibilities. The site is www.medicaretraining.com, and I
invite any of you to log on and take one of our online courses. I must warn you that there
is a pre-test and a post-test, so we can see how you do, but you will have plenty of
company. In 1998, over 15,000 of these courses were completed.
The last component of our provider education effort is a special duplicate claims
reduction program. It has two components: an edit for electronic claims that rejects
duplicates and a set of provider training materials. This program was particularly
popular with doctors, who often pay billing agencies by the number of claims they file,
and thus save money themselves by reducing duplicates. We piloted the program last year at
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, implementing the edit and sending the training materials
to the 250 providers who filed the most duplicate claims. The result was a reduction in
duplicate claim volume of 170,000 claims, resulting in an estimated savings of $7.40 for
each dollar spent. We expect that the program will save the Texas contractor over $1
million in administrative costs next year.
Improving Medical Review. While trying to reduce the number of errors made by
providers, we are engaging in a variety of efforts to catch errors that are made by
improving our contractor's medical review
processes. We have tested a protocol for an outside contractor to verify and validate all
contractor medical review practices and to recommend necessary corrective action. We will
also be hiring an outside contractor to evaluate local medical review policies to identify
policy similarities, differences, and gaps, and to assure compliance with national
Inpatient hospital claims are especially important since they are the most expensive
claims we pay, and we will be implementing an aggressive plan to lower the error rate in
inpatient claims. Among the types of analyses we may use are changes in patterns of DRG
coding, prevalence of readmission of the same patient to the same facility on the same day
as discharge, and changes in patterns of very short stay admissions. We are also working
with our Peer Review Organizations to develop and test new ways to ensure the medical
necessity of inpatient hospital claims.
With respect to physician payments, we are conducting thorough prepayment reviews of
documentation on a random sample of physician office visit claims and are developing a
testing process. That process will help us determine whether services are actually
rendered and medically necessary, allow for projection of a national claims error rate,
and help to spot areas for improvement.
Enhancing Contractor Evaluation. A key component of these efforts is managing
our contractors. We are improving our assessment process to better gauge the effectiveness
of contractor medical review and benefit integrity activities. This will ensure that we
obtain the most from our contractors and will give the contractors solid guidance as to
where improvements are needed.
Using Technology. We are always looking for ways to use technology to help us "pay it right."To assure we are taking advantage of the latest in
anti-fraud technology, we have begun cataloging and evaluating fraud detection
technologies for use by Medicare contractors. This is an ongoing process allowing us to
keep abreast of developments in the field.
An example of our successful use of technology is the Correct Coding Initiative, a
package of more than 93,000 automated edits we have required contractors to use since
1996. This initiative has saved hundreds of millions of dollars since its inception, and
we continue to improve on it with new edits being tested and added regularly. Similarly,
the HCFA Customer Information System enables us to view provider or service utilization
data at the national, State, contractor, provider type, or individual provider level. As a
result, audits or reviews can be focused, rapidly and inexpensively, on a particular
Implementing the Medicare Integrity Program. As discussed earlier, HIPAA gave
us new authority to hire specialized contractors to perform program integrity functions.
This will be a key part of our efforts to reduce the payment error rate in the future.
There will be at least three types of program integrity contractors. Program Safeguard
Contractors will perform the standard program integrity functions that are currently part
of the claims processing handled by carriers and intermediaries. This new contrActing
authority allows us to contract with different entities to perform these tasks, and will
give us new flexibility in managing and evaluating these functions. We expect to begin
hiring these types of contractors shortly.
Collecting Overpayments Identified by the Inspector General. We have already
recovered almost all of the overpayments identified in this year's CFO audit, and we have intensified payment recovery
efforts overall. In addition, we have instructed our contractors to evaluate providers
identified in the CFO audit report for more extensive oversight.
RECENT LAWS AND LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS
Thanks to the work of your Committee and this Congress, we now have more tools we need
to fight fraud and abuse. These tools from the Balanced Budget Act let us:
- exclude providers convicted of felonies or health related crimes;
- levy new civil monetary penalties on hospitals who contract with providers who have been
excluded from Medicare;
- levy civil monetary penalties on providers who take kickbacks;
- require provider applicants to provide Social Security numbers and employer
identification numbers so we can check the applicant histories; and
- tighten eligibility and close loopholes for home health services.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act also for the first time created
a stable source of funding for program integrity activities -- in fiscal 1999, $560
million. It also gave us authority to contract with special program integrity contractors.
Under HIPAA, $630 million will be available for program integrity functions in fiscal
President Clinton's fiscal 2000 budget also
includes several new proposals to continue our success in fighting health care fraud,
waste, and abuse. These measures would save an additional $2 billion in Medicare
expenditures over five years and preserve the Medicare Trust Funds. The proposals include:
- eliminating excessive Medicare reimbursement for drugs;
- ending overpayments for Epogen, a drug used to treat anemia related to chronic renal
- preventing abuse of Medicare's partial
- ensuring Medicare does not pay for claims owed by private insurers;
- empowering Medicare to purchase cost-effective high-quality health care; and
- requesting new authority to enhance contractor performance.
We look forward to working with you to secure passage of these important provisions.
Through additional tools provided in the BBA and HIPAA, our Comprehensive Program
Integrity Plan, our corrective action plan, the President's new proposals, and your continued support, I am
confident that we will continue to make progress in reducing the payment error rate.
A second function of the CFO Audit is to determine whether HCFA's internal accounting
mechanisms are in order. In public accounting terms, the purpose of an audit is to permit
the auditors to render an opinion as to whether the financial statements are presented
fairly and in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
There are four types of audit opinions: 1) an unqualified opinion, which means the
financial statements are fairly presented; 2) a qualified opinion, which means the
financial statements are fairly presented except for the effects of specific matters as
described in the auditor's report; 3) an adverse
opinion, which means the financial statements are not presented fairly; and, 4) a
disclaimer of opinion, which states that the auditor does not express an opinion on the
financial statements and gives all the substantive reasons for the disclaimer. We received
a qualified opinion, which is a significant step above an adverse or disclaimer of opinion
but represents that we still have work to do to achieve an unqualified opinion.
I am also very pleased to say that since fiscal 1996 we have resolved two major
financial statement shortcomings, we have worked with the auditors to satisfy their
concerns with two other shortcomings, and we are making progress on remaining areas of
In response to the fiscal 1996 audit, we responded to concerns regarding Medicare
accounts payable ledgers to the satisfaction of the external auditors. In addition, we
funded an audit of the Social Security Administration process for withholding Supplemental
Medical Insurance premiums that did not disclose any material weaknesses. In response to
the fiscal 1997 audit, we were able to clarify our handling of cost reports and the
Medicaid payables and receivables to the auditors'
satisfaction, and we have made progress in each of the remaining areas of concern to the
The one remaining issue that prevents us from obtaining a clean audit is accounts
receivable. The auditors could not be sure the receivable number was correct due to the
lack of general ledgers and other documentation at most Medicare contractors. Concerns
were also expressed about internal controls. Finally, because States use different
accounting systems, their reporting of Medicaid receivables is inconsistent.
Our goal for the long run is to standardize contractors' claims processing systems so we can have an
integrated accounting system. However, this will require extensive system changes which
will not be possible given the priority that we and our contractors must place on ensuring
all systems are Year 2000 compliant. In the meantime we will focus on using the
contractors' existing subsidiary systems to
improve the quality of data, and to identify and document the audit trails necessary to
support and validate the data reported to HCFA.
We also have two efforts underway in 1999 toward resolving the accounts receivable
qualification. First, we are currently reviewing our policies for determining the Medicare
Secondary Payer (MSP) receivables at 15 Medicare contractors that comprise 80 percent of
all Medicare contractor receivable activity to improve procedures to ensure that FY 1999
accounts receivable data are adequately processed and documented. This determination may
enable us to significantly reduce the amount of accounts receivable that remain on the
books and to obtain a clean opinion for next year's
We intend to improve our internal controls for assuring that transactions are properly
recorded and accounted for, safeguarded against loss, and in compliance with laws and
regulations. For example, we are updating financial reporting instructions and requiring
components to clearly identify controls.
We are also working to improve security in electronic data processing. We have
introduced a systems security initiative to aggressively address vulnerabilities found
through the Inspector General's and our own
reviews. Our goal is to be able to maintain the tightest security as the business
environment in which we operate changes, and to integrate security into every aspect of
our information technology management activities.
While we have work to do to improve the results of the CFO audit, we are pleased with
the pace of the progress we have made in reducing the estimate of improper payments and
getting our financial statements in order. With your help and support, we will continue to
do everything in our power to fight fraud, waste, and abuse; to ensure that the Medicare
program "pays it right;"and to ensure that our financial reporting is sound
and the Medicare Trust Funds are well managed.