I am pleased to be here today to describe our plans to inform Medicare beneficiaries of their
health plan options under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) and to assist them in making
the right choice for their needs. Ensuring that beneficiaries are adequately informed of their
options has been a major focus of this committee. You played a leadership role not only in
defining the scope of the information campaign in the BBA but also in ensuring that it is
adequately funded. Without adequate funding, beneficiaries will not have the tools they need to
make the right choices.
We testified before your committee last year on this same issue. At that time, we described our
various initiatives and I am pleased to report that we have made significant progress since then.
- We are in the process of gathering our first comprehensive picture of enrollee satisfaction
through the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. It is
designed to provide a consumers-eye view of how health plans really work, and allow
beneficiaries to make apples-to-apples comparisons between plans. Results will be
available to Medicare beneficiaries by November 1998.
- We are finalizing plans for our first nationwide mailing of basic and comparative
information on Medicare+Choice options, original fee-for-service Medicare, and private
supplemental coverage "Medigap" policies available to beneficiaries.
- We are also finalizing plans for toll-free telephone service and local counseling services
to assist beneficiaries in making informed choices.
- We will this fall release, via the Internet, comparative information on the Health Plan
Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures for 1996 which were adapted for
Medicare and include information on plan performance, such as mammography screening
rates. Our new Internet site, Medicare.gov, will provide basic comparison information on
Medicare plan options by zip-code through Medicare Compare.
As you know, the BBA expands health care options available to Medicare beneficiaries through
the creation of the Medicare+Choice program. Under this program, Medicare beneficiaries will
be able to choose to receive their Medicare benefits either through original Medicare, as the
current Federally-administered fee-for-service program is now called, or from an array of
Medicare+Choice private options such as Health Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider
Organizations, Provider Sponsored Organizations, as well as Private Fee-for-Service Plans and
Medical Savings Account Plans. These choices are designed to offer Medicare beneficiaries
options similar to those available in the private sector to people with employment-based health
insurance. Medicare+Choice also is designed to expand access to managed care options for
Medicare beneficiaries in rural and other areas where these options have been lacking.
The BBA added new challenges to making sure Medicare beneficiaries have what they need to
make informed choices.
- Phased lock-in: To date, beneficiaries could enter and drop out of managed care plans on
a monthly basis. Under BBA, beginning in 2002 beneficiaries will be locked into most
Medicare+Choice options for six months. Starting in 2003, the lock-in period will be nine
months. And beneficiaries enrolling in Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs) will be locked
in for one year starting in 1999.
- Changes in enrollee costs: Some new options involve changes in enrollee costs.
Medicare provides protections to limit beneficiaries out of pocket health care costs.
However, under BBA, beneficiaries will be offered options which alter these protections.
Private fee-for-service plans under BBA have no limits on premiums that can be charged
to beneficiaries. Plans are free to negotiate their own payment rates, and providers can
bill up to 15% beyond the plan's rates. With MSAs, beneficiaries must negotiate their
own payment rates, and there are no limits on what providers can charge.
- Benefits not standardized: The BBA did not include provisions that would have made it
easier to explain options to beneficiaries. It did not standardize commonly offered
additional benefits, which would have made it easier for beneficiaries to compare
Medicare+Choice and Medigap options. The BBA also did not include provisions to limit
preexisting condition exclusions and expand open access for Medigap options for both
disabled and elderly beneficiaries so that they can more freely move back into traditional
fee-for-service Medicare. Without these provisions, it will be more of a challenge to help
beneficiaries understand the consequences of some choices and whether specific options
will meet their specific needs and desires.
We are doing our best to meet the challenges posed by the BBA within the limited discretion we
have under the law, and I would like to summarize for you today our plans and the challenges
that we face.
The National Medicare Education Program
While the Medicare+Choice program expands choice, as indicated above, the context for this
choice will be significantly different than under Medicare's previous risk-contracting program.
Besides weighing the value of additional benefits such as prescription drugs and low copayments
that plans may offer, beneficiaries will also have to be aware of the potential for higher
out-of-pocket expenses, variable supplemental benefits, and the implications of lock-in. The
complexities added by the scope of options in the BBA are a concern because our research has
shown us that, even before the BBA changes, many beneficiaries were confused about their basic
Medicare benefits and, therefore, did not use the program to their full advantage.
Many beneficiaries do not understand the basics of the original Medicare fee-for-service program
or their current HMO options, according to surveys by us and the HHS Inspector General. And
beneficiaries with some understanding often have only superficial knowledge.
- For example, one third of beneficiaries reported knowing little or nothing about original
Medicare benefits or out-of-pocket payment for services.
- Over 40 percent indicate that they know little or nothing about private supplemental
- About one-third of beneficiaries do not understand that if they disagree with a payment or
coverage decision, they have the right to appeal it.
- Perhaps most critically, 6 out of every 10 beneficiaries report knowing little or nothing
about managed care.
In recent focus group testing of Medicare+Choice materials, we found that few beneficiaries
have any knowledge of the Balanced Budget Act or the Medicare+Choice initiative. When we
have shown beneficiaries the options they will have under Medicare+Choice, many become
overwhelmed by the number of choices, and even well educated beneficiaries have difficulty
understanding them all.
Clearly, beneficiaries will need assistance to understand the implications of the expanded
Medicare choices under the BBA and how to use the HCFA-developed information tools that
will be available annually through the Medicare Handbook and via the World Wide Web. We
also need to make sure beneficiaries understand that they can choose to do nothing and continue
to receive care through original fee-for-service Medicare or their current managed care plan.
To respond to this need, HCFA is embarking on a National Medicare Education Program, the
purpose of which is to ensure that our beneficiaries receive accurate, easily understandable
information about their benefits, rights, and health plan options to assist them in becoming more
active participants in their health care decisions.
We are establishing extensive partnerships in this effort. We have 23 partners on our
coordinating committee. They includes the American Association of Health Plans, the American
Association of Retired Persons, the federal Administration on Aging, the American Society on
Aging, the AFL-CIO, the Consumer Coalition for Quality Health care, the Department of
Defense TRICARE Marketing Office, Families USA Foundation, the Health Insurance
Association of America, the Health Resources and Services Administration, the International
Longevity Center, the Medicare Rights Center, the National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, the
National Association of Area Agencies on Aging, the National Association of Community
Health Centers, the National Association of State Units on Aging, the National Council of Senior
Citizens, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute on Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Disease, the National Organization for Rare Disorders, the U.S. Office of Personnel
Management Office of Insurance Programs, the Visiting Nurses Association of America, and
Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
We have 15 organizations participating on task forces. They include the American Academy of
Family Physicians, the American Hospital Association, the American Music Therapy
Association, the American Nurses Association, the Employers' Managed Health Care
Association, the General Services Administration Consumer Information center, the Georgetown
Institute for Health Care Research and Policy, Hewitt Associates, Indian Health Services, the
National Alliance for Caregiving, the National Osteoporosis Foundation, the People's Medical
Society, Resource Connectors Ltd, the Spry Foundation, and Towers Perrin.
We have 28 organizations helping us as educational affiliates. They include the 60 Plus
Association, Aging Services Inc., the Alliance for Aging Research, the American Academy of
Family Physicians, the American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association, the Association
of Jewish Aging Services, the Ball State University Center for Gerontology, the Eastman Kodak
Co., Iona Senior Services, the National Agricultural Library, the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners, the National Association of People with AIDS, the National
Association of Retired Federal Employees, the National Association of Social Workers, the
National Coalition for the Homeless, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and
Medicare, the National Consumers League, the National Library of Medicine, the National Rural
Health Association, the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, the Office of
Minority Health Resource Center, the Partnership for Prevention, the Department of Labor
President's Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Office of Managed Care, the Summit Health coalition, the United Auto
Workers, the United Cerebral Palsy Institute on Disability and Managed Care, and the United
Senior Health Cooperative.
We also intend to work closely with Health Insurance Advisory programs (formerly known as
Health Insurance Information Counseling and Assistance programs), and hope to coordinate
efforts with local agencies on aging.
Through this program, we want to educate Medicare beneficiaries so that they can make
informed health plan decisions rather than making decisions based on inaccurate, misleading, or
The National Medicare Education Program will employ a number of strategies to educate
- Medicare program benefits
- health plan choices
- their rights, responsibilities, and protections
- health behaviors and health promotion
As part of this program, HCFA will provide access -- via the Web, a toll-free call center, and in
print materials -- to general program information and specific comparative information about
Medicare+Choice options. The information comparing plan options is crucial to empowering
beneficiaries with the knowledge that will help them evaluate Medicare+Choice options along
with the original Medicare program and make informed decisions based on their individual
needs. Equally important is the need to make clear that HCFA's provision of local comparative
data is intended neither to encourage or discourage beneficiaries from choosing one health care
plan over another nor to favor a choice of a Medicare+Choice plan over original fee-for-service
The National Medicare Education Program will use a phased educational approach moving from
awareness to understanding to use of information by beneficiaries to make personal decisions
about the best value health plan option for them.
In 1998 and 1999 we will begin the initial phases of the program during which we will: make
beneficiaries aware that new health plan options are coming; prepare them for making an
informed choice; and help them understand HCFA's role and mandate as it relates to Medicare.
In all, we want to emphasize that the choice is theirs -- that is, they do not have to change if they
are satisfied with the benefits and care that they are currently receiving.
During the next phase of the program (in 2000 and beyond), we want to help beneficiaries
understand the importance of both making an informed choice and assessing the quality of
services received under Medicare. We also want to emphasize to beneficiaries that they should
make their choices based on their individual needs. For beneficiaries, their families, and others
working on their behalf, we want to strive to assure that they: are aware of the resources and
tools to use to help in the choice-making process; understand that Medicare cares about quality;
and perceive that the Medicare program is a reliable and credible information broker about health
care plans and coverage.
Through the program, we want to assure that our beneficiaries develop skills and acquire
knowledge to make informed choices, including making use of comparative quality measures
and assessing the appropriateness of available options given their individual medical needs. This
activity is part of a larger effort to educate Medicare beneficiaries about ways to improve their
health through healthy living and appropriate use of benefits.
The National Medicare Education Program is a five-year effort. We will be constantly learning
from our efforts. A program assessment will be integrated into the design and implementation of
the program. The assessment will provide information to: 1) improve practices and procedures,
2) add or drop specific program strategies and techniques, and 3) replicate successful aspects of
the program elsewhere. The focus of the program assessment will be whether the "right" actions
are being taken in the "right" way, and whether the desired outcomes are being achieved.
HCFA's objectives for the National Medicare Education Program in 1998 include:
- Building alliances with other consumer centered organizations to work with HCFA in
disseminating information and educating our beneficiaries and our other partners who
work on beneficiaries' behalf. HCFA has invited a broad array of public and private
sector organizations to join an Alliance Network to foster cooperation among these
groups nationally and at the local level to enable Medicare beneficiaries to make
informed health care decisions. These groups can choose to participate at three different
increasingly active levels of involvement and leadership ranging from supporters in
information dissemination to national leadership partners.
- Test-marketing alternative information broadcast approaches focusing on various
Medicare managed care markets. We are formally testing information which will be
presented in print and over the Internet with groups of beneficiaries to assess their
understanding of the intent of the information and the usefulness of the style of the
- Developing a national community-based customer service strategy that leverages the
existing community-based organization network and lays the foundation for future
support from a broad base of public, private, and volunteer community-level support.
While Medicare is a national program, beneficiaries interact with the health system
locally. A sustainable community-based infrastructure is essential to support the
counseling needs of beneficiaries. We are seeking approaches to develop and leverage
existing networks of community-based organizations that can be used to assist
beneficiaries. HCFA Regional Offices will take the lead in this effort beginning with
developing local strategies for the special information campaign in 1998. We are also
working with foundations to identify opportunities to fund development of innovative
- Educating and training principal information intermediaries, such as Health Insurance
Advisory programs, advocacy groups, and community-based organizations. We are
planning an intensive training program targeted to our contractors and our partners who
will be actively involved in providing information and counseling to beneficiaries and
those who work on their behalf. We will provide training regarding the program changes
resulting from the Balanced Budget Act and the tools and resources that will be available
to them in working with beneficiaries.
Spending Plan for the National Medicare Education Program
For the 1998 fiscal year, HCFA plans to spend about $114 million on the National Medicare
Education Program. This includes $95 million collected in user fees, provided for in the BBA,
and about $19 million from our program management and peer review organization (PRO)
accounts, which will fund activities that would have been funded without the BBA but which
will be folded into the comprehensive National Medicare Education Program. The lion's share of
the money is devoted to the beneficiary handbook/plan comparisons and the 1-800 toll-free
information line. Let me briefly outline our spending plan.
Medicare Handbook/Medicare+Choice Comparisons - In FY 1998, we estimate that the costs
to design, print and mail the combined Medicare Handbook/Medicare+Choice Plan Comparisons
will be about $35 million, or just under $1.00 per beneficiary. An additional $10 million will be
spent on related Medicare+Choice program printing needs, including the costs for printing and
mailing the initial enrollment package to individuals who will soon be eligible for Medicare.
Only one handbook will be mailed per household. The per person cost for the handbook is higher
than in previous years because the health plan comparative information is being provided. We
are currently estimating that there will be over 500 different versions of the plan comparison
section of the handbook. Each version will be tailored to the options available in the market in
which the beneficiary resides. The 1999 version of the book will be mailed to beneficiaries in the
fall so it can be used during the November open enrollment period. The information included in
plan comparisons will be expanded over time to include HEDIS performance measures, enrollee
satisfaction results and disenrollment rate information.
1-800-MEDICARE - We estimate that the cost for the 1-800-MEDICARE toll-free call center
will be just under $45 million in FY 1998. Needless to say, we are not as confident of this
estimate because of the tremendous uncertainty regarding how many beneficiaries will utilize
this service and how long the average call will last. Callers to the service will first reach an
automated response unit that could be either touch-tone or voice activated. Spanish language and
hearing impaired service will be provided. This service will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week and will allow callers to order Medicare publications, request a disenrollment form or hear
recorded answers to frequently asked Medicare+Choice questions. Callers also will be able to
talk to customer service representatives from 8:00 a.m. through 4:30 p.m. local time, Monday
through Friday, about more complex questions and to obtain comparative information about local
health plan options. Once the service is operational nationwide, we estimate that over 2,000
service reps will be needed during peak call times.
Community Support/Information Infrastructure - The remaining $24 million will fund a host
of other activities, including (1) the Internet site, which will provide comparative information to
beneficiaries and those who counsel with them, (2) the Health Insurance Advisory Program
activities, (3) surveys of enrollee satisfaction, (4) a national publicity campaign which will
feature health fairs, (5) development of information materials to be used by beneficiary
counselors, and (6) evaluations and other projects to monitor and improve how we communicate
this important information to our beneficiaries.
FY 1999 Request - For fiscal year 1999, we are estimating that we need about $173 million --the
full amount of user fees authorized in the BBA ($150 million) and $23 million from our
program administration and PRO accounts, which will fund activities that would have been
funded without the BBA but which will be folded into the comprehensive National Medicare
Education Program. Most of the increase is devoted to a much larger projected cost for the
1-800-MEDICARE toll-free line. In both FY 1998 and FY 1999, some of the funds are needed
for start-up costs, such as training and management information systems. We anticipate that in FY
2000 when start-up activities are completed, the line item for this activity will be less than it is in FY 1999.
Specifically, for FY 1999 we are again projecting about $45 million for the handbook and other
printing needs. We estimate $80 million for the toll-free service; about $33 million for HIA,
beneficiary satisfaction surveys, a national publicity campaign featuring health fairs, the Internet
site, and evaluation of the consumer information activities; and reserving about $15 million in a
contingency fund, given the uncertainty of the demand for toll-free call center services.
We appreciate the support of this Committee for the appropriation of the full amount authorized
for the 1999 user fees. We should point out that since $23 million in funding is coming from
other sources, it is imperative that both HCFA's full FY 1999 appropriation request and our
request for authority for user fees for other parts of the program be approved. We also want to
call to your attention to the fact that the BBA authorizes $100 million in user fees for consumer
education and information activities in fiscal years 2000 and beyond. Given the current
uncertainty over beneficiary demand for Medicare+Choice options, we may need to revisit the
adequacy of this funding level once we have a better understanding of the type of information
beneficiaries find useful.
While we support broader choices for Medicare beneficiaries, implementing the
Medicare+Choice program presents HCFA with many new challenges. Key among them is to
ensure that Medicare beneficiaries receive accurate, easily understandable information about
their benefits, rights, and health plan options so that they can make informed health plan
decisions. We are committed to giving beneficiaries accessible information so that they can avoid
making decisions based on inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete information. This is an
extremely important task, and we know that we cannot succeed without adequate resources. We
trust that this Committee will continue to play a leadership role in trying to ensure that
beneficiaries have the tools that they need to make informed choices.