This is an archive page. The links are no longer being updated.
April 9, 2002
Mr. Chairman, Mr. Miller, and members of the Committee, I am honored to appear before you today to discuss the next phase of welfare reform in the areas of work and child care. Together our work has had a profound impact on our nation's most vulnerable families. We have exceeded the most optimistic expectations by assisting millions of families in moving from dependence on welfare to the independence of work; and we have provided a strong commitment to child care to ensure parents can go to work without worrying about the safety and well-being of their children. I am confident that together our work in reauthorizing the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program and the Child Care and Development Block Grant and Child Care Entitlement programs will lead to even greater achievements in the future.
President Bush has laid out a clear path for reviewing all of the programs impacted by the historic, comprehensive Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). The President made a commitment to pursue four important goals to continue transforming welfare in the lives of those that it helped: strengthen work, promote strong families, give States more flexibility and show compassion to those in need. These goals formed the guideposts in shaping the Administration's proposals for TANF and child care.
I would like to spend my time today sharing with you the important progress we have made in strengthening families under these two critical programs and the President's agenda for reauthorization. I will begin with TANF, the cornerstone of our welfare reform efforts.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
As a former governor, I can tell you that the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program B or TANF B has been a remarkable example of a successful Federal-State partnership. States were given tremendous flexibility to reform their welfare programs and as a result, millions of families have been able to end their dependency on welfare and achieve self-sufficiency.
Since August 1996, welfare dependence has plummeted. As of September 2001, the number of families receiving assistance, which represents the welfare caseload, was 2,103,000 and the number of individuals receiving assistance was 5,343,000. This means the welfare caseload and the number of individuals receiving cash assistance declined 52 percent and 56 percent, respectively, since the enactment of TANF. Between January and September of last year national caseloads actually declined about two percent, and while the July to September statistics indicate a slight increase, the figures are still well below the previous year's caseload levels. The general trend suggests the national caseloads are not rising but, instead, have stabilized.
In New York City, where we are understandably most concerned about job opportunities, the city achieved more than 53,000 job placements for welfare recipients from September through December 2001. While the number of TANF recipients increased briefly as a direct result of the tragedy of September 11, by January there were about 18,000 fewer TANF recipients on the rolls than there were in August. Indeed, in December New York City had its lowest number of persons on welfare since 1965.
Some other positive outcomes we have seen since the law's passage include:
But even with this notable progress, much remains to be done, and States still face many challenges. Last year, my Department held eight listening sessions throughout the country to discuss the TANF program and understand the new challenges ahead. The States overwhelmingly support this program. States, administrators, recipients, employers, and advocates have provided valuable insight into how we could make the program even more responsive to the needs of families, while keeping the basic structure and purpose of the program.
The Administration's proposal to reauthorize TANF would build upon our stunning success by:
I would like to offer some detail on each of these elements.
Our proposal seeks to strengthen the Federal-State partnership by maintaining the Federal financial commitment to the program and by making some key policy changes to increase State flexibility. We provide $16.5 billion each year for block grants to States and Tribes and an additional $319 million for annual Supplemental Grants to States that have experienced high population growth and had historically low funding levels. We will also reauthorize and improve the $2 billion Contingency Fund. Authorization for both the Supplemental Grant program and the Contingency Fund expired in 2001, but one year extensions for both were recently enacted into law as part of the economic stimulus package signed by President Bush last month. We continue the current maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement to retain States= contribution to assistance for children and families. Finally, we will restore over five years the policy permitting the transfer of up to 10 percent of TANF funds to the Social Services Block Grant.
In addition to these basic funding provisions, we propose a number of policy changes on the use of funds that will provide States increased flexibility in managing their programs.
The second element of our reauthorization proposal is to maximize self-sufficiency through work. States would be required to engage all TANF families with an adult in self-sufficiency activities. States must approve activities as part of self-sufficiency plans and regularly review case progress.
And in addition to the requirement for universal engagement, we will increase the direct work requirement. In order for a case to be counted as participating, our proposal requires welfare recipients to participate for a full 40 hours per week in monitored activities to simulate a full work week. Cases counted as participating would be required to average at least 24 hours per week (of their total required 40 hours) in direct work, including employment, on the job training, and/or supervised work experience. States will have the flexibility to decide which activities should make up the remaining 16 hours. These could include a variety of services the States determine are needed by the family.
On a temporary basis, certain cases could be counted as participating even if they did not average 24 hours per week in direct work. These cases would still be fully participating B defined as 40 hours per week B but could be in work-related training, short term substance abuse treatment, or rehabilitation for up to three months within any 24-month period. When calculating participation rates States will be allowed to exclude parents with children under 12 months of age. As in current law, teen parents who are heads of households and maintain satisfactory school attendance will be deemed as meeting all participation requirements.
We will also gradually increase minimum participation rate requirements. In FY 2003, at least 50 percent of all TANF cases headed by a parent will be required to participate in combined work and other activities designed to help them achieve self-sufficiency. This percentage will increase five percentage points each year until reaching 70 percent in 2007. Calculation methods will be improved to recognize practical challenges States face in keeping recipients involved and participating in the program. There will be no separate standard for work participation for two-parent cases.
The current penalty structure will apply when a State fails to meet either, or both, of the universal engagement or participation rate requirements. Potential penalties will be limited to a maximum of five percent of a State's TANF grant, as under current law. States subject to a penalty will have the opportunity to develop a corrective compliance plan and no penalty will be assessed as long as they are making progress toward meeting the requirements. The current caseload reduction credit will be phased out so that States still receive full credit against participation targets in the first year, 50 percent of credit in the second year and no credit thereafter. The five-year cumulative lifetime limit for TANF cash assistance will be retained. States may also continue to exempt up to 20 percent of their cases from this limit.
Finally, understanding the significant barriers that tribes face to self-sufficiency, HHS will undertake a major new technical assistance effort for tribal organizations to help them build and administer effective Tribal TANF programs.
Our proposal embraces the needs of families by promoting child well-being and healthy marriages. To this end, we establish improving the well-being of children as the overarching purpose of TANF. This change recognizes that the four current goals of TANF are important strategies for achieving this purpose. Similarly, we clarify and underscore that the fourth goal of TANF is to encourage the formation and maintenance of healthy, two-parent, married families and responsible fatherhood.
In addition, we will target $100 million from the discontinued Illegitimacy Reduction Bonus for broad research, evaluation, demonstration and technical assistance, focused primarily on healthy marriage and family formation activities. Funds previously used for the Illegitimacy Reduction Bonus could be spent far more effectively on developing innovative approaches to support family formation and healthy marriages. Strong and stable families are good for children and must be a central goal of our next steps in welfare reform.
Research shows that both adults and children are better off in two-parent families. It is no criticism of single parents to acknowledge the better outcomes for children of married-couple families. Rather the research findings support the underlying principles that impel us to redirect our policies so as to encourage healthy marriages, especially when children are involved. Our approach to promoting healthy marriage is to provide financial incentives for States, often working together with private and faith-based organizations, to develop and implement innovative programs to support family formation and healthy marriages. Those demonstration programs will be carefully evaluated and information about successful programs will be broadly disseminated.
Along those lines, we also redirect $100 million from the current-law High Performance Bonus to establish a competitive matching grant program for States and Tribes to develop innovative approaches to promoting healthy marriages and reducing out-of-wedlock births. State expenditures will be matched dollar for dollar and TANF funds may be used by States to meet their matching requirement.
We require States to discuss in their State plans the efforts they will make to accomplish the family formation goals of the TANF program, including the promotion of healthy marriages, and their efforts to provide equitable treatment for two-parent married families.
And finally within the context of our goals to strengthen family formation and reduce illegitimacy, we will reauthorize the Abstinence Education grant program to States and territories at $50 million per year.
Our fourth reauthorization element focuses on improving program performance. We will replace the current High Performance Bonus with a $100 million Bonus to Reward Employment Achievement for meeting the employment goals of TANF. We also will require States to establish and report on performance goals related to each of the four major goals of TANF and to describe in their State plans how they are addressing each. Likewise, States will be required to describe particular strategies and programs they are employing to address critical TANF challenges. We will research the best ways to construct performance measures that relate to the TANF goals, collaborate with States to identify key performance measures, and build uniform data support and reporting methodologies.
For any organization to succeed, it must never stop asking how it can do things better. Using the flexibility under programs such as TANF and the One-Stop Career Center system, States have made great strides towards transforming and integrating their public assistance programs into innovative and comprehensive workforce assistance programs. But, with greater flexibility even more can be accomplished.
In the final key element of our proposal, we establish new State program integration waiver authority to permit States to further integrate a broad range of public assistance and workforce development programs in order to improve the effectiveness of these programs. Broad flexibility to develop new strategies and approaches will be provided, enabling States to design fully integrated welfare and workforce development systems that could revolutionize service delivery. Of course, the purposes of these programs must continue to be met. States will be required to identify the programs and activities for which waivers are requested, describe how the program purposes will be achieved, and show how the proposal will improve or enhance the achievement of such goals.
I would like to turn now to another program that offers a vital connection to a family's ability to work and achieve self-sufficiency -- child care.
In 1999, 20 million families in the United States had one or more children under the age of 13 with an employed mother. Thirty-two percent of these families were low-income. For a number of reasons, including the high cost of child care, many of these families have difficulty finding care arrangements that they can afford. I can tell you from my experience as Governor of Wisconsin, access to child care assistance can make a critical difference in helping low income families find and retain jobs.
Further, studies measuring the impact of child care subsidies on employment in several communities and States across the country show that receipt of subsidies substantially increases the likelihood of employment. Eighty-three percent of all families who received child care subsidies in 1999 did so because the parents were employed (with most of the other parents receiving subsidies while in training or education).
As we approach reauthorization of our child care authorities, the Administration is committed to preserving the key aspects of the program: parental choice; administrative flexibility for States and Tribes; support for work and job training; inclusion of faith-based and community-based organizations; and healthy development and literacy skills for children in care. The major restructuring of the Federally funded child care programs under PRWORA remains an effective and efficient method for distributing child care funds to States. States were given flexibility to determine the best use of those funds to meet the varying needs of their low-income populations. Therefore, our proposed reauthorization of the discretionary Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) and mandatory Child Care Entitlement programs, does not seek any changes to the underlying structure and financing of these essential programs. Rather, we enthusiastically support maintaining the historically high level of funding for child care.
Our proposal includes $2.1 billion for the Child Care and Development Block Grant and $2.7 billion for Child Care Entitlement -- a total of $4.8 billion for what is referred to as the Child Care and Development Fund or CCDF. But these funds are only part of the picture. Funding for child care also is available through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, or TANF block grant, the Social Services Block Grant, or SSBG, and other sources. Looking at recently available historical data on State and Federal dollars associated with CCDF, TANF and SSBG, we estimate that about $11 billion will be invested in child care through these three block grants alone. The Head Start program provides another $6.5 billion for early childhood education in FY 2002.
Under our proposal, States continue to have flexibility to use Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds for child care both by transferring up to 30 percent of TANF funds to CCDF and by spending additional TANF money directly for child care. In recent years, States have used significant amounts of TANF funds for child care, including $2.3 billion for transfers to CCDF and $1.4 billion in direct spending in FY 2000. In addition to CCDF and TANF, other programs in my Department also fund early childhood care and education, including the Social Services Block Grant and Head Start. And the Administration's education bill, recently passed by the Congress and signed by President Bush, includes additional flexibility and funding for school age care and literacy programs. Taken together, all of these funding opportunities have substantially increased the amount of resources available for quality child care and related programs.
Funding available through our child care programs and TANF transfers alone will provide child care assistance to an estimated 2.2 million children in FY 2003. This is a significant increase over the number served just a few years ago (in 1998 about 1.5 million children received subsidized care) and does not take into account additional children who will be served by the Social Services Block Grant and TANF direct spending for child care. When children by the Social Services Block Grant and TANF direct spending for child care are considered, it is estimated that approximately one-half million additional children will be served in 2003.
The overall goal of TANF reauthorization is child well-being. Child care supports this goal as well as being a vital work support. Our child care reauthorization proposals complement our expectation that all families will be fully engaged in work and other meaningful activities by ensuring that resources are available to support safe, affordable child care when necessary.
In addition to supporting working parents, quality child care promotes early childhood development and literacy skills. To improve quality and support the child development component of child care, States support a range of strategies and the Department manages a broad portfolio of training and technical assistance activities to support their efforts. According to the latest plans submitted by States, the most common approaches include grants and loans to providers for specific quality improvements, training and technical assistance for providers and staff, monitoring of compliance with regulatory requirements, strategies to improve retention and compensation of child care providers, and a special focus on improving the quality of care for infants and toddlers.
The President's budget maintains funding for quality child care. A minimum of four percent of the CCDF must be spent on activities to promote quality. In addition, the budget proposes to retain set-asides for infant and toddler care, school-age care and resource and referral services, additional quality expenditures, and ongoing research to identify and promote effective child care practices. My Department is providing technical assistance to equip States to make the best use of their quality funds, including activities that promote literacy. At the same time, we are promoting systemic partnerships between child care, Head Start, family literacy, and other school readiness and reading programs. In addition, last week the President announced his Good Start Grow Smart Initiative which will have a very positive impact on strengthening the early literacy component of child care and Head Start.
States have significant flexibility to decide how child care funds will be used and what will be emphasized in achieving the overall goals of improving access to care and the quality of care. For example, within basic Federal requirements, States determine eligibility criteria and co-payments for families as well as provider reimbursement rates. The Department convenes State child care officials and other experts to assess needs within the child care system and to plan remedies where they are needed and improvements where they are possible. Further, to add to this dialog, this year we are funding the first federally sponsored child care policy demonstrations that will be rigorously evaluated.
Along with State flexibility, parental choice is a key element of a successful child care program. Families must be allowed to choose the care that best meets their needs, whether with a relative, neighbor, child care center, faith-based program, or after-school program. In FY 2000, over 78 percent of CCDF subsidy payments were made using certificates or vouchers. Using these vouchers and other child care payments, 56 percent of children were cared for in a child care center, while 31 percent were in family child care homes, four percent were in group homes, and nine percent were in the child's home. To help parents make these critical child care decisions, CCDF funds parent education and outreach. Nationally, my Department funds the Child Care Aware web-site and toll-free hotline to link parents to information about child care in their local communities.
We are on the right track with CCDF and we must maintain a high level of Federal funding commitment to ensure our child care resources continue to meet the needs of working families.
Mr. Chairman, the proposal I bring before you today contains many different elements. What binds these fundamental elements together is the desire to improve the lives of the people and families protected by America's social safety net. As noted by the President, "We've made progress, there's no question the doors of opportunity that were shut and sealed have now been opened.... Yet there is no acceptable level of despair and hopelessness in America. We will not leave people in need to their own struggle, and we will not leave them to their own fate." The President has publicly stated his commitment to the next phase of welfare reform; and this committee demonstrated its desire to succeed when you made the hard choices on the original precedent-setting PRWORA legislation and in your on-going interest in the impact of these changes. It is time to take the next steps in welfare reform and the President and I stand ready to work with you to achieve even greater successes for America's neediest families.
I would be happy to answer any questions you have.
HHS Home (www.hhs.gov) | ASL Home (www.hhs.gov/asl/) | Disclaimers (www.hhs.gov/Disclaimer.html) | Privacy Notice (www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html) | FOIA (www.hhs.gov/foia/) | Accessibility (www.hhs.gov/Accessibility.html) | Contact Us (www.hhs.gov/ContactUs.html)
Last revised: April 9, 2002