 |
|



|
 |

This is an archive page. The links are no longer being updated.
Statement of
Josefina G. Carbonell
Assistant Secretary for Aging
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Before the
Special Committee on Aging
United States Senate
Field Hearing
New York City, New York
February 11, 2002
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:
Thank you for this opportunity to discuss the Administration
on Aging's (AoA) perspectives on emergency preparedness
for the elderly and those with disabilities. We appreciate
your leadership in convening this hearing on responding
to the needs of at-risk populations during and following
a local or national state of emergency.
Mr. Chairman, the past six months have been emotional ones
for all of us. Being in New York City today -- so close
to one of the worst human tragedies in American history
-- brings once again into focus all the vivid pictures that
many Americans only watched in horror from their living
room televisions.
We have learned many lessons from September 11. First and
foremost, we have proven again that Americans are the most
patriotic and resilient people in the world. Second, we
have learned that we are not immune to terrorist attacks,
and we must do all we can to support the President's efforts
to protect the freedom we enjoy as Americans. Third, we
have learned that we must be better prepared to deal with
the possibility of future attacks on our way of life or
other such disasters that impact our citizens and our families.
The Administration on Aging is charged with providing essential
home and community-based services to those most in need
older persons, those who are frail and who have disabilities,
as well as their caregivers. Through the Older Americans
Act, the AoA works in partnership with our national aging
network of State and area agencies on aging, tribal organizations,
service providers and hundreds of thousands of family caregivers
and volunteers. AoA's programs touch people's lives where
they live in their homes and communities. We provide
meals in senior centers, and to those who are homebound.
We also provide transportation to and from medical appointments
or perhaps shopping or pharmacies as well as preventive
health services, such as screening for diabetes, and many
other important supportive services that enable older citizens
to remain at home. Thanks to your leadership, we are also
able to provide assistance for the first time to family
caregivers who struggle on a daily basis to care for their
older loved ones.
Today, there are approximately 45.7 million people 60 years
of age or older. Many of these individuals have chronic
health problems, and many are homebound. These individuals
are dependent upon community service systems for their day-to-day
existence. And that number is growing. Estimates show that
by 2003, there will be 4.7 million frail, elderly persons
85 and older which indicates that the need
for services for the aging population will only increase
with time. In an emergency, these individuals represent
the most vulnerable sector of our population.
Perspectives on What We Have Learned from September
11.
The events in New York, Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon
on September 11 heightened our awareness of the importance
of good communication. As we all now know, communication
was one of the most critical challenges experienced in the
hours and days following the attacks. It was difficult assessing
what areas were safe and how to communicate with others
to plan the next steps to protect ourselves or those we
are entrusted to serve. Telephone service, something we
all take for granted, was not available. You will remember
that in Washington, D.C. communication was impaired due
to system overloads. Here in New York this was further compounded
by power outages, especially in the areas surrounding the
World Trade Center. The fact that we did not have an alternative
communication system made it very difficult for us to determine
the immediate needs of our seniors.
Immediately after the attacks, I was in touch with the
New York State Office on Aging to assess the situation.
Because the New York City Department for the Aging had lost
phone service, this was a challenge. As was the case with
many of my colleagues, staff were impacted due to the proximity
of our offices to the World Trade Center. Upon evacuation
of 26 Federal Plaza in the hours after the attack, our Regional
Administrator first ensured that all staff were evacuated
safely. Later, offices were reopened in temporary quarters
in New York City in order to continue to serve our customers.
Then, only by using a handheld personal pager system with
satellite linkages was he able to communicate with us in
Washington during the first few hours and days following
the attacks. This connection was incredibly valuable until
emergency phone systems and other communications could be
arranged. Portable cell phones, battery radios, and laptop
computers were essential in the early days following the
attacks.
Our heavy reliance on computer data systems, which hold
client data about hard-to-reach older persons who rely on
our services, was also at risk. Some of the material could
not be retrieved and concerns were raised about confidentiality
and information security. Just as we did after Hurricane
Andrew in South Florida, our network had to find out who
needed help the old-fashioned way through neighborhood
teams who went door to door identifying the needs of those
who were homebound. Sometimes extraordinary events call
for extraordinary measures.
Many elderly people were stranded in their apartments.
Others were either physically unable or afraid to leave
their own residences. For example, the work of the Visiting
Nurse Service of New York (VNS) was invaluable, as we will
hear later in today's hearing. Following September 11, VNS
was tasked with locating and assisting their frail and isolated
homebound clients confined in the areas around the World
Trade Center. Individuals were cut off from their doctors,
grocers, and pharmacies. AoA was proud to work in partnership
with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
to assist the VNS in their efforts to reach those in need
of food and water. AoA worked with the New York State Office
on Aging and the New York City Department for the Aging
to help facilitate access for the VNS.
AoA also joined with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services in the establishment of a 24-hour, rapid response,
multilingual hotline for older New Yorkers living in lower
Manhattan. This allowed seniors to quickly access help in
filling prescriptions, receiving personal services, therapies,
transportation to health care professionals, or other important
daily living needs. In addition, the New York aging network
was able to establish a telephone system staffed by older,
visually impaired adults who provided information and assistance
to other visually impaired, older New Yorkers. In response
to the need for continued, seamless availability of Medicare
and Medicaid services, CMS ensured that medical and benefit
payments flowed despite dislocation of staff and/or the
destruction of offices and systems and coordinated certain
emergency help for New York City below the 14th Street disaster
area.
For some, reliable caregiving systems completely disintegrated
as a result of family and friends who were affected by the
event. In Washington, D, C, a caregiver dropped his mother
off at an adult day care center on his way to work at the
Pentagon and never returned. I am deeply grateful that funds
from our National Family Caregiver Support Program were
able to provide the family with one week of respite for
the mother at a group home so they could attend to the funeral
of her son. We know that there must be many similar stories
here in New York.
Mr. Chairman, the importance of providing funding as quickly
as possible to aid in recovery and relief efforts for older
persons is paramount during these types of situations. The
Administration on Aging was able to immediately provide
almost $1.8 million in emergency funding to the State of
New York following the September 11 attacks. These funds
were provided to ensure that services would continue to
be provided to those who needed them the most. Additionally,
we were able to provide $25,000 to Virginia to assist seniors
and caregivers who were impacted by the Pentagon attack.
Recommendations for Emergency Preparedness Plans - Where
Do We Go From Here?
In the mid-1990's, AoA developed detailed
technical assistance materials and provided training to
key persons in the aging network in the event of a disaster.
As a result of the events of September 11, we are currently
in the process of updating these materials and plan to conduct
more intensive training. One of my priorities is to ensure
that our State and area agencies and tribal organizations
have emergency and back-up plans for natural or man-made
disasters in place, timetables for updating and revising
plans, and training programs on an ongoing and regular basis.
It is important too for plans at all levels to be available
for use on short notice when the unexpected occurs. In addition
to these plans, I recommend the following:
First, as I have stated, the need for alternative and back
up communication systems is paramount at all levels of government.
Battery-powered radios and other such devices need to be
made available in the event of land line and cell phone
failure;
Second, up-to-date information needs to be available about
who and how to contact key aging officials when a disaster
occurs and how to reach these individuals after hours and
on weekends. State agencies need to have contacts for all
of the area agencies which, in turn, need contacts for each
service provider. Consistent emergency protocols must be
available;
Third, up-to-date knowledge about who needs special assistance
should be readily available. For example, information about
clients is currently kept almost entirely at the community
level and is likely to be inaccessible in or immediately
following a disaster, which hampers the network and others'
ability to locate seniors who may need immediate assistance
or have special needs. We should develop a special needs
client data base accessible to States, area agencies on
aging and network providers. The aging network must develop
a strong working partnership with State and local emergency
management agencies to make sure that the names of frail
and at-risk older persons are on their list of individuals
with special needs. In times of disasters, elders with special
needs, such as those who have disabilities, those who are
electricity-dependent on ventilators or oxygen, those
with limited ability to speak English, and those who are
afraid must have their needs immediately addressed.
Fourth, aging network resources need to be coordinated and
integrated with and among larger Federal, State, and local
emergency management operations so as to avoid duplication
of efforts, and most importantly, to ensure that the special
needs of elders are incorporated into overall community
preparedness response action plans. We will be working with
the State and area agencies on aging to determine how the
current program can be shape to respond to these new challenges.
Additionally, it is important for everyone who is involved
in an emergency to be sensitive to the fact that some older
persons and individuals with disabilities may become disoriented,
may take longer to evacuate, may need special equipment
or may depend on others to help them evacuate.
Mr. Chairman, I also want to call to your attention the
need for mental health counseling to provide individuals
impacted by disasters an opportunity to react to and talk
about what they have experienced. Shortly following September
11, the Department of Health and Human Services held a Mental
Health and Substance Abuse Summit here in New York City.
While it did not address concerns specific to the elderly,
it did raise some key points that warrant attention. We
know the elderly experience the same grief, anger, fear
and sense of loss as others, but the disruption to their
daily routine can be overwhelming. For younger persons,
the possibility of recovering to a point they experienced
before the disaster has greater probability. For older persons,
their losses are more likely to be permanent losses, be
it their home, possessions, their caregivers, or other important
aspects of their daily life.
The most important item to note in terms of post-traumatic
recovery is that for older persons, their day-to-day existence
is often more fragile; meaning that even the most modest
changes such as a neighbor moving or a meal site closing,
such as was experienced in Chinatown at the City Hall Senior
Center, may trigger a series of events that threaten or
even destroy their ability to continue independent living.
The need to make new living arrangements is much more complicated,
and the ability to recover from various losses can be very
difficult. We cannot let these frail individuals live in
isolation or in fear. We must do our best to provide continuity
and normalcy to their already fragile existence.
Preparing our workforce to respond
If we have learned anything from September 11, it is that
we cannot predict the future. We can, however, be better
prepared. As an agency, and certainly within the Department,
we are now taking action to update our own disaster assistance
and training efforts rather than talking about it as a "future"
event.
One of the first steps we took was to update our employee
roster for both central and regional office staff with more
detailed information about ways to contact staff and their
families. We implemented some back-up communication arrangements
with hand-held communication and other portable devices.
A second step was to greatly tighten up our in-house emergency
plans. These events have heightened our awareness for the
need to educate our staff and to improve employee evacuation
and safety concerns. We have had training sessions on fire
safety and CPR. More training is planned.
Finally, in order to better prepare our own network to
address unexpected disasters, such as bio- terrorism, the
Administration on Aging is revising our Disaster Preparedness
Training Manual utilizing the experience gained from this
incident and other disasters. We are working with States,
area agencies on aging and local communities to use this
material to train staff at all levels for the development
of preparedness plans. In these uncertain times, everyone
should know what to do if a disaster occurs.
In closing, we are very proud of the continued commitment
of Secretary Thompson to help our seniors and their families.
His philosophy that the Department of Health and Human Services
is "one department" increased the capacity of
all agencies to provide much needed assistance during this
crisis. We applaud the dedication of so many of our Federal
partners, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and others who answered
the call that day and in the weeks and months to follow.
And again, we are very proud of the heroic work of the New
York aging network. I would like to give special acknowledgment
to Igal Jellinek, the Executive Director of the Council
on Senior Centers and Services of New York, which has focused
much of its energy on emergency preparedness at the local
level.
I want to again commend you for calling today's hearing.
As responsible public officials, we must do everything in
our power to help our communities to be prepared. Most areas
around the country have emergency plans in place. However,
I cannot speak with confidence that these plans cover all
the needs of the elderly. Today's hearing is a very important
step. Mr. Chairman, thank you for this opportunity and for
your continued concern for our nation's older Americans
and their caregivers. I would be happy to respond to any
questions.
HHS Home (www.hhs.gov) |
Topics (www.hhs.gov/SiteMap.html) |
What's New (www.hhs.gov/about/index.html#topiclist) |
For Kids (www.hhs.gov/kids/) |
FAQs (answers.hhs.gov) |
Disclaimers (www.hhs.gov/Disclaimer.html) |
Privacy Notice (www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html) |
FOIA (www.hhs.gov/foia/) |
Accessibility (www.hhs.gov/Accessibility.html) |
Contact Us (www.hhs.gov/ContactUs.html)
Last
revised: February 11, 2002
| | |